Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy (EVE)

Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy : a Comparative Study of Macintosh and GLIDESCOPE Ranger®

The objective of this work is to compare standard intubation with video laryngoscope (Glide scope Ranger ) in French pre hospital multicentric study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: In France, patients in critical status brought to hospital by emergency physicians and nurses experimented in tracheal intubation. It is an invasive act allowing a protection of airways and an optimal oxygenation of the patients in distress. The reference technique is the direct laryngoscopy by Macintosh . Corresponding data shows that a video laryngoscope - GLIDESCOPE laryngoscope - improve the conditions of intubation in the surgical unit thanks to a better display(visualization) of the opening. A derived device for pre hospital emergency units (GLIDESCOPE Ranger®) deserves to be compared with the classic laryngoscopy in emergency conditions.

Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method

Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients of more than 18 years old
  • requiring an intubation
  • by medical out of hospital emergency operators
  • medical insurance
  • Consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18, pregnant women
  • Refusal of consent or inability for understanding study
  • small mouth opening makes it impossible intubate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1: Classical intubation
Classical intubation
Experimental: 2: Glidescope intubation
GLIDESCOPE intubation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
IDS score in each group
Time Frame: during the intubation
during the intubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Vomit / regurgitation or inhalation per-procedure
Time Frame: during the intubation
during the intubation
Dental or throat traumatism
Time Frame: during the intubation
during the intubation
Broncho/laryngospasm
Time Frame: during the intubation
during the intubation
Hypoxia
Time Frame: per intubation
per intubation
Hemodynamic instability
Time Frame: per intubation
per intubation
Inhalation pneumonia
Time Frame: within 24 hours following the inclusion
within 24 hours following the inclusion
Failure of intubate
Time Frame: during the intubation
during the intubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Patrick PLAISANCE, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Principal Investigator: Sébastien GALLULA, Ph, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Clinical Trials on Classical intubation

3
Subscribe