Evaluation of the CardioSond Electronic Stethoscope in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

April 16, 2018 updated by: SonoMedica, Inc.

Validation of the CardioSond Sonospectrographic Digital Electronic Stethoscope in Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease Versus CT Angiography

The study is designed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the CardioSond digital electronic stethoscope in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with and without known disease who are referred to cardiac computed tomography angiography (CT scans).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

The CardioSond is a noninvasive medical device which detects heart sounds using ultrasensitive acoustic technology. The CardioSond produces a flow micro bruit score which is used to determine the likelihood of coronary artery disease.

The CardioSond exam will be given to patients two times: once prior to administration of vasodilators and potential beta blockade agents as part of the normal cardiac CT angiography protocol and again immediately post CT angiography. No other data will be taken on the patient and the patients involvement in the study will cease after data collection.

CT angiography data will be analyzed at a core lab at Medstar Research Institute and withheld from SonoMedica until all CardioSond acoustic data is analyzed and flow micro bruit scores are determined.

A data review panel lead by the principal investigator will examine the results of both the CardioSond and CT angiography data to determine the comparative accuracy of the CardioSond in detecting CAD in the study population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

107

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010-2975
        • Washington Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be sourced from patients presenting for cardiac CT angiography who meet inclusion / exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness to sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • History of prior myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (i.e. stents) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Heart rate over 70 beats per minute post beta blockade
  • Artery calcification resulting in non-diagnostic CT angiographic images
  • Supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias that would be expected to affect CT angiography image quality (e.g. atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia, bigeminy and trigeminy). Patients with isolated premature atrial contraction and premature ventricular contractions may enroll
  • Any pulmonary condition that would create abnormal physical findings that would interfere with the fidelity of the cardiac sound recordings (e.g. obstructive pulmonary disease, such as asthma or COPD, with audible wheezing)
  • Presence of audible aortic or pulmonic diastolic murmurs, tricuspid or mitral flow diastolic murmurs or continuous murmurs
  • Any chest wall configuration preventing adequate contact between the CardioSond acoustic recording sensor and precordium
  • Any medical condition that would be expected to affect CT angiography image quality

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the comparative diagnostic accuracy of the CardioSond digital electronic stethoscope versus CT angiography in detecting CAD, as defined as a stenosis of a major epicardial coronary artery of 50% or greater.
Time Frame: Patient participation will be limited to the day of their CT angiography exam (day 1). Patients will receive two seperate CardioSond examinations which on average takes approximately 20 minutes.
The CardioSond digital electronic stethoscope's flow micro bruit score will be used as an indication of probability of disease in patients with and without known disease and compared to the results of CT angiography.
Patient participation will be limited to the day of their CT angiography exam (day 1). Patients will receive two seperate CardioSond examinations which on average takes approximately 20 minutes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the effects of vasodilators and beta blockade on CardioSond digital electronic stethoscope data results on data taken post CT angiography.
Time Frame: Patient participation will be limited to the day of their CT angiography exam (day 1). Patients will receive two seperate CardioSond examinations which on averages takes approximately 20 minutes.
The patient's flow micro bruit scores from each CardioSond examination (one pre CT angiography and one post CT angiography) will be compared to each other to assess the effects on the score of vasodilators administered as part of the CT angiography exam.
Patient participation will be limited to the day of their CT angiography exam (day 1). Patients will receive two seperate CardioSond examinations which on averages takes approximately 20 minutes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allen J. Taylor, M.D., MedStar Health Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SM-C103
  • 2010-153 (Other Identifier: Medstar Research Institute)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

3
Subscribe