Trial Comparing Electric and Harmonic Scalpel in Mastectomy (Harmonic)

March 6, 2014 updated by: Barretos Cancer Hospital

Prospective Trial Comparing the Use of Conventional Electric Scalpel and Harmonic Scalpel in Mastectomy

Prospective trial comparing post-operative complications and seroma formation after mastectomy in patients with breast cancer, using conventional electric scalpel and harmonic scalpel.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The population of this study was formed by women aged older than 18 years old, with breast carcinoma (ductal ou lobular) at any stage, form whom modified radical mastectomy is proposed. Patients were excluded if the present blood dyscrasia, collagen diseases, known uncontrolled chronic disease, infections (mammary or axillary, ulcerated tumors and pregnancy. The women were submitted to modified radical mastectomy consecutive allocated in electric scalpel group and the other group with harmonic scalpel.

Electric scalpels were calibrated at 40 watts of cutting and coagulation power and harmonic scalpel with a GEN04 generator calibrated at power levels 3 and 5, using the HP054 handpiece and HF105 curved blade.

Local postoperative complications analysed were seroma, hematoma, skin necrosis and infection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil, 14.784.400
        • Hospital de Câncer de Barretos.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Women with breast cancer candidate to a radical mastectomy during the year of 2008.

Prospective trial with women stratified consecutive.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Breast carcinoma (ductal or lobular)
  • Modified radical mastectomy was the surgery to be realized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not inclusion criteria
  • Blood dyscrasia, collagen diseases, known uncontrolled chronic diseases, infections (mammary or axillary), ulcerated tumors and pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Electric Scalpel Mastectomy
Radical mastectomy with electric scalpel
Radical mastectomy with electric scalpel. Electric scalpels were calibrated at 40 watts of cutting and coagulation power.
Experimental: Harmonic scalpel mastectomy
Radical Mastectomy with harmonic scalpel
Radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel. Harmonic GEN04 generator calibrated at power leve 3 and 5, using the HP054 handpiece and HF 105 curved blade

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in operative conditions and first week seroma drainage
Time Frame: 1 week.
Time of the surgery and blood loss volume during surgery. Drain volume postoperative in the first week
1 week.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in local complication
Time Frame: day 7 and day 14
Number of participants with adverse events as seroma, hematoma, skin necrosis and infection
day 7 and day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Edmundo C Mauad, MD, PhD, Director from Barretos Cancer Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 133/2008 HCB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complication, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Electric scalpel

3
Subscribe