Intensive Management of Pressure and Volume Expansion in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (IMPROVES)

June 18, 2013 updated by: Miriam Treggiari, University of Washington
The purpose of our study is to determine how well Triple-H works and how safe it is. The investigators are hoping to determine the effects of starting the therapy early and to explore if hypervolemia and/or hypertension are beneficial, and what the optimal target ranges are.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Efficacy of Triple-H therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age more than or equal to 18 years
  2. Aneurysmal SAH of any clinical grade
  3. Head computed tomography demonstrating SAH
  4. Cerebral angiography revealing the presence of cerebral aneurysm(s) in a location that explains the SAH
  5. Treatment of aneurysm with clipping or coiling must be carried out prior to randomization and within 72 hours of bleeding
  6. Signed consent by study participant or applicable legal representative within 72 hours after SAH

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of traumatic SAH
  2. Non-aneurysmal SAH as indicated by no demonstrable aneurysm by cerebral angiography
  3. Presence of an unsecured intracranial aneurysm(s) at risk of rupture that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data
  4. Delayed referral with clipping/coiling greater than 72 hours after the initial bleeding
  5. Time of symptom onset cannot be reliably determined
  6. Intracranial hypertension (ICP >25 mm Hg) at the time of screening
  7. History within the past six months and/or physical findings on admission of decompensated congestive heart failure (NYHA functional class III or IV, or objective class C or D)
  8. Acute, evolving or recent myocardial infarction
  9. Cardiac arrhythmia or second and third degree atrio-ventricular block causing hemodynamic instability
  10. Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis
  11. Suspected or confirmed pregnancy
  12. Non English speaking
  13. A condition that would preclude the performance of the neurobehavioral test battery due to a prior diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, stroke, degenerative condition, cerebral tumor, or mental retardation
  14. Severe terminal disease with life expectancy less than 6 months
  15. Refusal of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Normal Fluids & Normal Blood Pressure
Patients are treated with conventional fluid replacement (Normovolemia) and maintenance of blood pressure in a normal range (Conventional Blood Pressure).
Patients are treated with conventional fluid replacement (Normovolemia) or increased the fluid replacement (Hypervolemia) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Hypervolemia
  • Normovolemia
Patients are treated with maintenance of blood pressure in a normal range (Conventional Blood Pressure) or increased the blood pressure (Augmented Blood Pressure) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Blood Pressure
  • Augmented Blood Pressure
Active Comparator: Increased Fluids & Normal Blood Pressure
Patients are treated with fluids to achieve higher volume expansion (Hypervolemia) and maintenance of blood pressure in a normal range (Conventional Blood Pressure)
Patients are treated with conventional fluid replacement (Normovolemia) or increased the fluid replacement (Hypervolemia) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Hypervolemia
  • Normovolemia
Patients are treated with maintenance of blood pressure in a normal range (Conventional Blood Pressure) or increased the blood pressure (Augmented Blood Pressure) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Blood Pressure
  • Augmented Blood Pressure
Active Comparator: Normal Fluids & Higher Blood Pressure
Patients are treated with conventional fluid replacement (Normovolemia) and maintenance of blood pressure in a higher range (Augmented Blood Pressure).
Patients are treated with conventional fluid replacement (Normovolemia) or increased the fluid replacement (Hypervolemia) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Hypervolemia
  • Normovolemia
Patients are treated with maintenance of blood pressure in a normal range (Conventional Blood Pressure) or increased the blood pressure (Augmented Blood Pressure) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Blood Pressure
  • Augmented Blood Pressure
Active Comparator: Increased Fluids & Higher Blood Pressure
Patients are treated with fluids to achieve higher volume expansion (Hypervolemia) and maintenance of blood pressure in a higher range (Augmented Blood Pressure).
Patients are treated with conventional fluid replacement (Normovolemia) or increased the fluid replacement (Hypervolemia) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Hypervolemia
  • Normovolemia
Patients are treated with maintenance of blood pressure in a normal range (Conventional Blood Pressure) or increased the blood pressure (Augmented Blood Pressure) for 10 days.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Blood Pressure
  • Augmented Blood Pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Our primary endpoint is to determine the feasibility of the pilot study within the ICU setting and collect preliminary estimates for sample size calculations.
Time Frame: 6 months
1. Estimation of the eligible population once specific study inclusion & exclusion criteria are applied 2. Estimation of enrollment projections, retention, attrition & losses to follow up; 3. Assessment of compliance with protocol instructions; 4. Evaluation of protocol violations; 5. Achievement of pre-determined hemodynamic goals in each study group.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miriam Treggiari, MD, PhH, MPH, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2013

Last Verified

June 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Fluid manipulation

3
Subscribe