Open-Label Study of Deoxycholic Acid for the Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat in the Submental Area

December 8, 2015 updated by: Kythera Biopharmaceuticals

Multicenter, Open-label Study of ATX-101 (Sodium Deoxycholate Injection) for the Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat in the Submental Area

To evaluate the safety of deoxycholic acid subcutaneous injections in the submental area (below the chin).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90212
        • Mark Rubin
      • LaJolla, California, United States, 92121
        • Mitchel Goldman
      • San Juan Capistrano, California, United States, 92675
        • Jeffrey Klein
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Steven Teitelbaum
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Ava Shamban
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
        • Susan Weinkle
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
        • Palm Beach Cosmetic
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Steven Dayan
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70124
        • Lupo Center for Aesthetic and General Dermatology
    • Michigan
      • Warren, Michigan, United States, 48088
        • Grekin Skin Institute
    • New Jersey
      • Hillsborough, New Jersey, United States, 08844
        • David Goldberg, MD
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Roy Geronemus, MD
      • New York, New York, United States, 10028
        • Macrene Alexiades-Armenakas
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
        • Sue Ellen Cox
    • Pennsylvania
      • Yardley, Pennsylvania, United States, 19067
        • Richard Fried
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37215
        • Michael Gold
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77056
        • Suzanne Bruce
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • Jeffrey Adelglass

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Submental fat graded by the investigator as 2, 3, or 4 using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) and graded by the subject as 2, 3, or 4 using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS) as determined on visit 1 (within 28 days before the subject's first dosing session)
  • Dissatisfaction with the submental area rated by the subject as 0, 1, or 2 using the Subject Self-rating Scale (SSRS) as determined on visit 1 (within 28 days before the subject's first dosing session)
  • Males and nonpregnant, nonlactating females 18 years of age or greater, on the day of the subject's first dosing session (visit 2). Females of childbearing potential must have a negative human chorionic gonadotropin (serum) test result within 28 days before visit 2 and agree to practice adequate contraception, in the judgment of the investigator, during the course of the study
  • A normal result on coagulation tests (prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT)) obtained within 28 days before subject's first dosing session
  • History of stable body weight, in the judgment of the investigator, for at least 6 months before subject's first dosing session
  • Expected to understand and comply with the visit schedule and all protocol-specified tests and procedures and agreement by the subject to refrain from making significant changes, in the judgment of the investigator, to his or her dietary or exercise habits during the course of the subject's participation
  • Medically able to undergo the administration of study drug determined by clinical and laboratory tests obtained within 28 days before subject's first dosing session for which the investigator identifies no clinically significant abnormality
  • Signed informed consent obtained before any study-specific procedure is performed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any intervention to treat submental fat (eg, liposuction, surgery, or lipolytic agents)
  • History of trauma associated with the chin or neck areas, which in the judgment of the investigator may affect evaluation of safety or efficacy of treatment
  • A grade of 4 on the Submental Skin Laxity Grading scale (SMSLG) or any other anatomical feature (eg, predominant subplatysmal fat, loose skin in the neck or chin area, prominent platysmal bands) for which reduction in submental fat may, in the judgment of the investigator, result in an aesthetically unacceptable outcome
  • Evidence of any cause of enlargement in the submental area (eg, thyroid enlargement, cervical adenopathy) other than localized submental fat
  • Body mass index of ≥ 40 kg/m² as determined on visit 1 (week 0)
  • History or current symptoms of dysphagia
  • Any medical condition that would interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy or compromise the subject's ability to undergo study procedures or give informed consent
  • Treatment with radio frequency, laser procedures, chemical peels, or dermal fillers in the neck or chin area within 12 months before the first treatment session, or botulinum toxin injections in the neck or chin area within 6 months before the first treatment session
  • History of sensitivity to any components of the study drug or to topical or local anesthetics (eg, lidocaine, benzocaine, novocaine)
  • Previous treatment in this study or previous participation in a Kythera-sponsored ATX-101 study
  • Treatment with an investigational device or agent within 30 days before the subject's first treatment session

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Deoxycholic Acid 2 mg/cm²
Participants received deoxycholic acid 2 mg/cm² administered in 0.2 mL injections, up to 10 mL per treatment session at intervals of approximately 1 month for up to a maximum of 6 treatments.
Formulated as an injectable solution containing deoxycholic acid at a concentration of 10 mg/mL.
Other Names:
  • Kybella
  • ATX-101

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after last treatment (maximum of 18 months from first treatment)

Serious AEs include any event that met one or more of the following criteria: was fatal or life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged a hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or a significant medical hazard.

The severity of each AE was defined as either:

Mild: The participant was aware of the sign or symptom, but it was easily tolerated.

Moderate: The sign or symptom caused discomfort and interfered with usual activity.

Severe: The sign or symptom was incapacitating, and the participant was unable to engage in usual activity.

The investigator determined the relationship of each AE to the study drug using the question: "Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by treatment with the study drug?"

Up to 12 months after last treatment (maximum of 18 months from first treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale Scores (CR-SMFRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after last treatment
The CR-SMFRS score is based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant, where submental fullness is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after last treatment
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Scale Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question "How much fat do you have under your chin right now?" and answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Composite 1-grade Response
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment

A composite 1-grade response is defined as at least a 1-grade improvement from baseline on both the CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS.

The CR-SMFRS score is based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant, where submental fullness is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme).

The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question "How much fat do you have under your chin right now?" and answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat).

Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Composite 2-grade Response
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment

A composite 2-grade response is defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline on both the CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS.

The CR-SMFRS score is based on the investigator's clinical evaluation of the participant, where submental fullness is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme).

The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question "How much fat do you have under your chin right now?" and answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat).

Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale (PR-SMFIS)
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
The PR-SMFIS assesses the impact of submental fat on self-perception of 6 emotional and visual characteristics (unhappy, bothered, self-conscious, embarrassed, look older, and look overweight) related to the appearance of submental fullness as evaluated by the participant. Each item is rated on an 11-point numeric scale from 0 to 10. Scores for the 6 items were averaged to generate a PR-SMFIS total scale score ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is a positive outcome and 10 is a negative outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Self Rating Scale (SSRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
The SSRS assesses participants' satisfaction with their appearance in association with the face and chin on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6 (0 = extremely dissatisfied, 1 = dissatisfied, 2 = slightly dissatisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = slightly satisfied, 5 = satisfied and 6 = extremely satisfied). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Mean Change From Baseline in Self-rating of Attractiveness
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Self-rating of Attractiveness assesses aspects of appearance from the participant's perspective with a series of 6 questions: How attractive do you think your overall appearance (chin/neck, eyes, nose, mouth, entire face) is/are?" Each question was answered on a scale from 1 to 9 (1 = not at all attractive, 5 = neither attractive nor unattractive, and 9 = extremely attractive). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Response to Subject Global Questions
Time Frame: Month 3 and month 12 after last treatment

Participants answered 3 questions on a 7-point scale that ranged from "a great deal worse" to "a great deal better" (questions 1 and 2) or from "extremely dissatisfied" to "extremely satisfied" (question 3).

Question 1: Since the start of the study, how would you rate the fat under your chin right now?

Question 2: Since the start of the study, how would you rate the definition between your chin and neck right now?

Question 3: How satisfied are you with the treatment you received in this study?

Month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Percent Change From Baseline in Submental Fat Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Submental fat thickness was measured using calipers.
Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Change From Baseline in Submental Skin Laxity Grade (SMSLG)
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment

SMSLG assessment was based on clinical evaluation and palpation of the submental area. The SMSLG scale incorporates 3 features: skin wrinkling, adherence to underlying neck structures (bone and muscle) and redundancy (horizontal and vertical folds).

Grade 1 (none): no or minimal superficial wrinkling, skin well apposed to deeper neck structures, no skin redundancy (no skin draping (vertical folds) or skin sagging (horizontal folds));

Grade 2 (mild): mild superficial wrinkling, skin well apposed to deeper neck structures, minimal skin redundancy (slight skin draping and sagging);

Grade 3 (moderate): may have mild to moderate superficial wrinkling, skin has mild to moderate separation from deeper neck structures, moderate skin redundancy (moderate skin draping and skin sagging);

Grade 4 (severe): mild to marked superficial wrinkling, loose skin separated from deeper neck structures, marked skin redundancy (marked skin draping and sagging).

Baseline and month 3 and month 12 after last treatment
Change From Baseline in Line Drawing Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and month 3 after last treatment
Each participant was given 2 example line drawings representing each of the 5 submental fat grades (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme) and asked to select the drawing that best represents their current profile. Improvement is any decrease in grade, and worsening is any increase in grade.
Baseline and month 3 after last treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Frederick Beddingfield, III, M.D., PhD, Kythera Biopharmaceuticals, Inc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 31, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ATX-101-11-26

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe