Immunogenicity and Safety of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (Flumist) Administered by Nasal and Sublingual Route

November 5, 2013 updated by: International Vaccine Institute

A Controlled Study to Determine the Immunogenicity and Safety of Cold-adaptive Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (Flumist) Administered by the Nasal and Sublingual Route in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Background: It is well established that live attenuated organisms can be highly effective vaccines, immune responses elicited can often be of greater magnitude and of longer duration than those produced by non-living antigens and are often able to confer protection after a single dose. Unlike killed influenza vaccine preparations injected by the parenteral route, live influenza vaccines are able to induce potent secretory (mainly IgA) antibody responses in the airway mucosae and can also evoke cell mediated responses. T cell proliferation, cytokine production, cytotoxic T cell responses and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity have all been elicited by live attenuated vaccines.

There has been a history of the use of live attenuated flu vaccines as safe and effective vaccines for the prevention of flu in animals and humans. Live-attenuated cold-adapted influenza vaccines have been proved to be highly efficacious to protect against clinical fly symptoms. Among these, FluMist, a nasal vaccine formulation developed by Medimmune Inc, has been approved by the US FDA. Recent side by side clinical trials have demonstrated that this nasal vaccine was significantly superior to conventional killed flu vaccine in protecting against flu symptoms.

Sublingual administration of live influenza virus at a dose lethal by the nasal route was well tolerated and did not redirect virus to the olfactory bulb. In addition, in a recent Phase I clinical study (NCT00820144) conducted in France, the sublingual administration of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit (rCTB,up to 1 mg) in healthy adult volunteers was found to be safe.

A major issue has arisen regarding the ease with which vaccines could be administered to young children, especially infants, and to elderly subjects in whom nasal vaccination has not been possible and/or approved due to difficulties of administering nasal vaccines in infants and to undesired side effects related to frequent rhinitis and sneezing episodes in elderly subjects. This study is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a new route of administration of vaccines, using the nasal FluMist formulation as prototype vaccine.

Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a nasal and sublingual influenza virus vaccine (FluMist) in healthy adult volunteers

Study design: This will be a randomized study on a total 40 subjects; each 20 subjects will receive vaccine via nasal and sublingual route, respectively

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 49 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy volunteers who are able and willing to give informed consent, following a detailed explanation of participation in the study.
  • Volunteers who will be available for the duration of the study and available for scheduled and potential additional visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with any clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition or clinically significant abnormal serum biochemistry or haematology results that, in opinion of the Investigator, preclude participation in the study.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant (using urine test) or breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and unwilling to use a reliable method of contraception (e.g. oral contraceptives or contraceptive during sexual activities such as a condom, contraceptive diaphragm, intrauterine device, hormonal contraceptive, or intercourse with a male partner who has had a vasectomy etc.) throughout the study period.
  • Subjects who have known airway hypersensitivity to one of Flu vaccine excipients within 14 days prior to administration of study medication.
  • Subjects who have known buccal hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine or buffer solution used in this study, including subjects with phenylketonuria.
  • Subjects with direct contact with at risk groups (e.g. patients in special care units, immuno-compromised individuals, pregnant women, children under 2 years of age and individuals over 70 years).
  • Subjects with a known impairment of immune function including seropositive for HIV or those receiving (or have received in the 6 months prior to study entry) cytotoxic drugs immunosuppressive therapy (including systemic corticosteroids).
  • Subjects with a significant acute febrile illness (fever of 38.0 Celsius degree or more) at time of dosing.
  • Subjects who have chronic diseases: Chronic diseases will include all autoimmune and immuno-compromising conditions and any other chronic condition, which at the judgement of the Investigator, may put the subject at higher risk of side effects from the study vaccine. Conditions in the latter category might include unexplained anaemia, hepato-biliary disease, uncontrolled hypertension, subjects with prosthetic joints or heart valves, etc.
  • Subjects with a current problem, based on history, with substance abuse or with a history of substance abuse
  • Subjects who are currently involved in a clinical trial, have taken an investigational drug or have received investigational or licensed vaccines in the preceding 4 weeks or anticipate receiving a vaccine other than study medication during the first 4 weeks of the study
  • Subjects who have known hypersensitivity to eggs or egg proteins
  • Subjects who have chronic respiratory infections or syndromes
  • Unable to receive oral (sublingual) administration.
  • Receiving anti-viral agents.
  • Subjected to contraindications and/or precautions described in drug information

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Influenza vaccine-Nasal
Nasal administration
Administration of 1 dose (0.2 ml) by nasal route
Other Names:
  • Flumist (2011-2012)
Administration of 1 dose (0.2 ml) by sublingual route
Other Names:
  • Flumist (2011-2012)
Active Comparator: Influenza vaccine -Sublingual
Sublingual administration
Administration of 1 dose (0.2 ml) by nasal route
Other Names:
  • Flumist (2011-2012)
Administration of 1 dose (0.2 ml) by sublingual route
Other Names:
  • Flumist (2011-2012)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Passive Haemagglutination Inhibition Titer.
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination
Passive haemagglutination inhibition titer of serum at 21 days after vaccination.
21 days after vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Immunoglobulin A (IgA)-Antibody Secreting Cell Number to Flu Virus
Time Frame: 7 days after vaccination
Flu virus-specific IgG- and IgA -antibody secreting cells per ml of blood at 7 days after vaccination
7 days after vaccination
Salivary IgA
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination
Salivary Flu-specific IgA titer at Days 21 after vaccination
21 days after vaccination
Cell Mediated Immune Responses
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination
Interferon gamma production in peripheral blood monocyte (PBMC) after in vitro re-stimulation with influenza virus antigen at 21 days after vaccination.
21 days after vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyung-Sang Yu, M.D., Seoul National University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Cecil Czerkinsky, Ph.D., International Vaccine Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Influenza vaccine

Subscribe