Vaginal Electrical Stimulation Versus Neuromodulation (Estim)

June 8, 2016 updated by: University of Oklahoma

Vaginal Electrical Stimulation Versus Sacral Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder: A Pilot Study

This prospective study compares quality of life measures of patients with refractory overactive bladder, between two modes of neuromodulation: vaginal electrical stimulation (Group A) and sacral nerve stimulation (Group B).

The specific aims are:

1. To characterize patient symptom bother score, quality of life, and body image scores in patients obtaining sacral nerve stimulation, as compared to vaginal electrical stimulation.

- Hypothesis 1: Both modes of neuromodulation will impact patients' scores in quality of life, patient symptoms, and body image questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

All participants will have a standardized intake history which will include age, weight, history of prior treatment for incontinence, medication list, obstetric and gynecologic history, medical history, and surgical history, as well as a complete review of systems. The physical examination will include vital signs (including BMI), genitourinary exam, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ), and neurologic exam. All patients will undergo spontaneous uroflowmetry, urine dipstick from catheterized specimen, multichannel urodynamics, and 3-day voiding diary. Measurement of post-void residual will also be obtained. Completion of the UDI-69, King's Health Questionnaire10, and the Modified Body Image Perception Scale (MBIS) will also be part of the initial visit 11,12.

All participants taking anticholinergics will undergo a 2 week flush-out period prior to the intake assessment. After the intake assessment, the provider will determine which treatment option is appropriate to the participant, and they will then be assigned to one of the two treatment arms: Group A will use vaginal electrical stimulation using the Empi Intravaginal Stimulation Unit Minnova (Empi, St. Paul, MN, USA) and participants in Group B will receive sacral neuromodulation using InterStim (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The projected sample size is 48 patients. We anticipate the recruitment of 16 patients for the InterStim arm of this study and 32 patients who will undergo vaginal electrical stimulation. Participants will be drawn from the University of Oklahoma Urogynecology clinics. Our catchment area includes OU Physicians clinic (private clinic) and Presbyterian Professional Building (resident clinic). Our referral area includes all of Oklahoma as well as the surrounding states. Participants will be recruited by physician referrals as well as by campus advertisements.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of refractory OAB (+/- UUI)*
  • Female Gender
  • Eligible for both treatment interventions
  • Available for 8 weeks of follow-up
  • Able to complete study assessments
  • Must discontinue anticholinergics within 2 weeks of intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 21
  • Pregnancy
  • Stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse
  • Current use of anticholinergics
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Undergoing concurrent treatment for pelvic organ prolapse
  • Unstable or serious cardiac arrhythmia
  • Implanted pacemaker
  • Postvoid residual > 100ml
  • Unstable seizure disorder
  • Dementia or inability to follow instructions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Electrical Stimulation
Participants will have a dedicated visit with a pelvic floor physical therapist during which instructions on usage and technique for the Minnova unit will be given. The electrical parameters selected will be: 10 Hertz frequency, 5-second on/10=second off cycle, and a pulse width of 0.4 milliseconds. The bipolar square will be delivered over a range that varies from 0 to 100 milliamps, depending on the maximum current intensity comfortably tolerated by the patient. The participant will perform each treatment session for 20 minutes twice daily for 8 weeks. Participants will be asked to keep a log recording the dates, times, and duration of each treatment session.
Interstim device
Participants assigned to the sacral neuromodulation group will undergo InterStim device placement by one of the three Urogynecologists at OUHSC using a staged implant technique according to manufacturer's specifications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom improvement
Time Frame: 3 months
>50% improvement in symptoms and decrease in frequency of voids and episodes of nocturia. Subjective outcomes will be measured by improvement in scores on the UDI-6, KHG, and MBIS.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: S. Abbas Shobeiri, MD, Univerisity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Overactive Bladder

3
Subscribe