Carbohydrate Mouth-rinse (CHO rinse)

October 16, 2012 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

The Impact of a Sucrose Mouth-rinse in the Fasted and Fed-state on Time Trial Performance

Several studies have reported that carbohydrate (CHO) ingestion can improve performance during exercise of short duration (less than 60 min). However, there is no apparent metabolic explanation for this observation because endogenous CHO stores should not be a limiting factor during short duration exercise. Nonetheless, several groups have attempted to investigate CHO administration during short duration exercise with varying results. When CHO was administered intravenously, no performance effect was observed despite greater plasma glucose availability (5). Therefore, it was suggested that during exercise of short duration, exogenous CHO ingestion may exert its ergogenic effect by action through the central nervous system, possibly mediated by glucose receptors in the mouth. The latter has been investigated using a CHO-mouth rinse, whereby the CHO solution is spat out to remove any influence of the gut on exogenous CHO oxidation or performance. Using this rinse, studies have demonstrated results both for (5, 16), and against (1, 19) any improvement in short duration exercise performance when compared with a placebo. The discrepancy in the findings may be due to testing subjects in the fed (1) or fasted-state (5), when liver glycogen stores may be compromised. However, no study has tested subjects in both the fasted and fed-state using a CHO-mouth rinse. It remains to be determined whether CHO-mouth rinse is only effective at improving short duration exercise performance when subjects are in the fasted, compared with the fed-state. The investigators will test the hypothesis that CHO-mouth rinse improves performance in the fasted-state only compared with a placebo-rinse.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It has been well established that carbohydrate (CHO) ingestion during prolonged, moderate- to high-intensity endurance-type exercise can delay the onset of fatigue and enhance exercise performance. Interestingly, several studies have reported that CHO ingestion can also improve performance during more intense exercise of short duration-less than 45-60 min. However, there is no apparent metabolic explanation for this improvement, because endogenous CHO stores should not limit exercise performance during short duration exercise tasks. To examine exogenous and endogenous glucose kinetics during high-intensity cycling exercise, Carter and colleagues tested 6 endurance athletes for 1 h at 75% Wmax while infusing either 20% glucose or 0.9% saline. Despite greater plasma glucose availability in the glucose-infusion trial, total CHO oxidation rates did not differ between treatments. Moreover, no performance benefits were observed after intravenous glucose administration. Consequently, the authors suggested that CHO ingestion during high-intensity exercise of short duration might exert its ergogenic effect by acting through the central nervous system, possibly mediated by glucose receptors in the mouth or gastrointestinal tract.

To test this hypothesis, Carter and colleagues investigated the impact of a carbohydrate mouth-rinse solution on 1-h time trial performance. The use of a mouth-rinse treatment, in which a CHO solution is spat out without swallowing, was chosen to remove any influence of the gut or exogenous CHO oxidation on performance. Participants were reported to cycle faster after a mouth rinse with a 6.4% maltodextrin solution at every 12.5% of the trial completed compared with a placebo rinse. The authors concluded that CHO mouth rinsing improves time trial performance and that the mechanism responsible might be an increase in central drive or motivation mediated by glucose receptors in the mouth. However in the former study, subjects were tested in a fasted state, which is impractical compared to how athletes normally prepare for training and competition.

In follow-up to the former study, we tested the performance effect of a carbohydrate mouth rinse 2 h after subjects ingested a CHO rich meal. From an evolutionary viewpoint, it can be speculated that the potential stimulating effect of glucose in the mouth might be of considerable impact under conditions when liver glycogen stores might be compromised. In agreement with this theory, there was no performance improvement with a CHO mouth rinse during time trial performance 2 h following the ingestion of a CHO -rich meal. However, as there are now studies demonstrating results both for and against any ergogenic effect of a CHO mouth rinse during short duration time trials it remains to be determined whether CHO mouth rinse improves performance during a 1 h time trial in the fasted state only. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate any potential ergogenic effect of a CHO mouth rinse during a 1 h time trial performance in both the fasted and fed state.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Maastricht University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 33 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy
  • Male
  • 18 - 35 years of age
  • Endurance cycling trained (≥ 3 sessions of endurance exercise per week)
  • VO2 max ≥ 50 ml/kg/min
  • Training history of more than one year of ≥ 3 sessions of endurance cycling exercise per week
  • BMI < 25 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of medication
  • Smoking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: carbohydrate mouth rinse fasted
sucrose mouth rinse in the fasted state
sucrose beverage
Experimental: carbohydrate mouth rinse fed
sucrose mouth rinse fed state
sucrose beverage
Placebo Comparator: Placebo mouth rinse fed
placebo (non-caloric sweetened drink) in the fed state
placebo; non-caloric sweetened beverage for use as a mouth rinse
Placebo Comparator: Placebo mouth rinse fasted
placebo (non-caloric sweetened drink) in the fasted condition
placebo; non-caloric sweetened beverage for use as a mouth rinse

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to complete a set amount of work (time-trial performance)
Time Frame: laboratory visit 2
Time to complete the set amount of work measured in minutes. To determine if one intervention allows the subject to complete the given amount of work in a faster time period than the placebo.
laboratory visit 2
Time to complete a set amount of work (time trial performance)
Time Frame: laboratory visit 3
Time to complete the set amount of work measured in minutes. To determine if one intervention allows the subject to complete the given amount of work in a faster time period than the placebo.
laboratory visit 3
Time to complete a set amount of work (time-trial performance)
Time Frame: laboratory visit 4
Time to complete the set amount of work measured in minutes. To determine if one intervention allows the subject to complete the given amount of work in a faster time period than the placebo.
laboratory visit 4
Time to complete a set amount of work (time-trial performance)
Time Frame: laboratory visit 5
Time to complete the set amount of work measured in minutes. To determine if one intervention allows the subject to complete the given amount of work in a faster time period than the placebo.
laboratory visit 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Luc van Loon, Ph.D., Maastricht University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-3-068

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carbohydrate Mouth-rinse on Time Trial Performance

Clinical Trials on Carbohydrate drink

3
Subscribe