Assessment of the Effect of a Novel Surface Roughness Treatment on Dental Implants on Integration Success (Luna)

March 24, 2022 updated by: ZimVie

A Prospective Randomized-controlled Study of the Effect of Surface Topographies on Implant Integration Rates and Clinical Success

A study where dental implants with different roughened surfaces will be evaluated for the ability to resist countertorque forces.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study on dental implants with different roughened surfaces will assess its ability to resist countertorque testing at various study time points and demonstrate high success

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Chile
      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital San José

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients of either sex and older than 18 years of age
  • patients needing at least one dental implant to treat partial edentulism
  • patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative dental procedures
  • patients agreeing to all protocol visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with infection or severe inflammation at the intended treatment sites
  • patients smoking greater than 10 cigarettes per day
  • patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • patients with uncontrolled metabolic diseases
  • patients who received radiation treatment to the head in the past 12 months
  • patients needing bone grafting at the intended treatment sites
  • patients known to be pregnant at screening visit
  • patients with para-functional habits like bruxing and clenching

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Roughness group A
Osseotite Certain Tapered Group A
Device: Osseotite Certain Tapered Group A
Osseotite Certain Tapered with different surface roughness
Other Names:
  • Osseotite endosseous dental implant
EXPERIMENTAL: Roughness Group B
Osseotite Certain Tapered Group B
Device: Osseotite Certain Tapered Group B
Osseotite Certain Tapered with different surface roughness
Other Names:
  • Osseotite endosseous dental implant
EXPERIMENTAL: Roughness Group C
Osseotite Certain Tapered Group C
Device: Osseotite Certain Tapered Group C
Osseotite Certain Tapered with different surface roughness
Other Names:
  • osseotite endosseous dental implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary stability countertorque measures
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Resistance to countertorque measures showing primary stability and success of the implant
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative success rate
Time Frame: 2 years
Crestal bone regression (amount of bone loss measured) and equivalence in integration success (implant mobility)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

ZimVie

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaime Acuna, DDS, Hospital San José

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partial Edentulism

Clinical Trials on Osseotite Certain Tapered Group A

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Benin

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe