Doctor-Patient Communication About Colorectal Cancer Screening

December 31, 2019 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
The purpose of this study is to learn more about doctor-patient communication about colon cancer screening. This study will also look to see if there are differences in those who get colon cancer screening based on the discussion the doctor had with the patient.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States
        • Albert Einstein College Of Medicine
      • Bronx, New York, United States
        • Hhc, Gun Hill and Tremont

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Five health centers of the NYC RING will participate in this project. All are located in underserved urban communities within the Bronx.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Physicians

  • Attending physicians or third year residents specializing in internal medicine or family medicine, as per the medical director from the clinic.
  • Clinic is based at a NYC RING-affiliated practice.
  • English speaking; Due to limited resources, we cannot have each audio recorded consultation translated therefore, the consultation needs to be in English.

Patients

  • Ages 50-75 years old, per the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for screening. This will be determined by a pre-screening of medical records by the RSA.
  • Due for colorectal cancer screening at the time of the visit, ascertained through patient self-report (e.g., no colonoscopy within the past 10 years, no flexible sigmoidoscopy or barium enema within the past five years, and no FOBT within the past year).
  • Coming for either an annual physical exam or chronic care follow up visit, per patient self-report.
  • Planning to consult with the physician in English, per patient self-report. Due to limited resources, we cannot have each audio recorded consultation translated therefore, the consultation needs to be in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of colorectal cancer, per patient self-report or per EMR..
  • History of polyps being removed, per patient self-report.
  • Colonoscopy scheduled in EMR at time of screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pts having colorectal cancer screening
The target sample of this study will be approximately 200 primary care physician-patient consultations who discuss CRC screening during the course of a clinical visit. Physician and patient participants will come from primary care practices associated with the New York City Research and Improvement Networking Group (NYC RING).
The intervention will be the audio-recording of the physician-patient consultation, patient and doctor surveys. These audio recordings will be coded. It will also include follow-up phone calls with patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
describe doctor-patient communication about CRC screening
Time Frame: 2 years
screening adherence through self report. Screening adherence will be assessed by contacting the patients and asking them if they received the CRC screening test their doctor ordered at the audio recorded visit.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of doctor-patient communication about CRC screening and low-income patients' screening outcomes.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
examine the association between the quality of doctor-patient communication about CRC screening and low-income patients' screening outcomes
Time Frame: 2 years
intent to be screened (immediately after the consultation) using the item from Geller et al.25 and 2) self-efficacy for screening (immediately after consultation) in case there are few events of actual screening.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on surveys

3
Subscribe