High Dose Versus Low Dose Oxytocin for Augmentation of Delayed Labour (OxyHighLow)

March 1, 2019 updated by: Göteborg University
In a randomized control trial conducted in six study centers/labour wards in Sweden, consenting nulliparous women in active phase of labour and with a defined delayed labour progress will be randomized to receive a regimen of either high or low dose of oxytocin. Primary outcome is caesarean delivery rate. Secondary outcomes are: Apgar score, need of neonatal intensive care, hyper-stimulation of contractions, spontaneous vaginal birth rate, length of labour, postpartum haemorrhage, sphincter lacerations, experienced labour pain, epidural analgesia and the women´s childbirth experience one month postpartum (assessed with Childbirth Experience Questionnaire). Study results will contribute to establish good evidence-based routines regarding oxytocin treatment of delayed labour progress.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim is to compare starting dose and increment of amount of oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour to determine whether augmentation by high dose of oxytocin improves labour outcomes compared with a low dose of oxytocin, without effecting neonatal outcomes or birth experiences negatively.

Delay in labour, also described as poor progress, due to ineffective uterine contraction is a major problem in modern obstetric care and one of the main reasons for the increased rate of caesarean deliveries, in particular among nulliparous women. Infusion with synthetic oxytocin is a commonly used treatment of hypotonic uterine contractions. Despite the widespread use of oxytocin no consensus exists regarding the dosage of oxytocin, both starting dose and increment of amount of oxytocin.

In a randomized control trial conducted in six study centers/labour wards in Sweden, consenting nulliparous women in active phase of labour and with a defined delayed labour progress will be randomized to receive a regimen of either high or low dose of oxytocin. The expected outcome is a decreased caesarean section rate and increased rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery for women with high dose of oxytocin for augmentation, without affecting neonatal outcomes or childbirth experiences negatively.

Primary outcome is caesarean delivery rate. Secondary outcomes are Apgar score, need of neonatal intensive care, hyper-stimulation of contractions, spontaneous vaginal birth rate, length of labour, postpartum haemorrhage, sphincter lacerations, experienced labour pain, epidural analgesia and the women´s childbirth experience one month postpartum (assessed with Childbirth Experience Questionnaire). Based on a sample size calculation (α=0.05, β=0.80), 1045 women will be needed in each group. Analysis will be performed by the intention to treat.

Study results will contribute to establish good evidence-based routines regarding oxytocin treatment of delayed labour progress.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1376

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Göteborg, Sweden, 41685
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
      • Trollhättan, Sweden
        • NU Hospital Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy nulliparous women
  • singleton pregnancy
  • normal pregnancy
  • cephalic presentation
  • spontaneous onset of active labour
  • at term (37 - 42weeks gestation)
  • delay or arrest of active labour

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Swedish speaking women
  • previous uterine surgery
  • intrauterine growth retardation > - 22%
  • malpresentation at time of inclusion
  • intrapartal hemorrhage at time of inclusion
  • nonreassuring fetal-heart pattern at time of inclusion
  • meconium at time of inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High dose of oxytocin infusion
Oxytocin: High dose infusion
Active Comparator: Low dose of oxytocin infusion
Oxytocin: Low dose infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caesarean delivery rate
Time Frame: At birth
data from clinical records
At birth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spontaneous vaginal birth rate
Time Frame: At birth
data from clinical records
At birth
Length of labour
Time Frame: At birth
data from clinical records
At birth
Hyper-stimulation of contractions
Time Frame: At birth
data from clinical records
At birth
Postpartum haemorrhage
Time Frame: Two hours postpartum
data from clinical records
Two hours postpartum
Sphincter lacerations
Time Frame: At birth
data from clinical records
At birth
Epidural analgesia
Time Frame: At birth
data from clinical records
At birth
Experienced labour pain
Time Frame: Two hours postpartum
VAS 0-100 mm where 100 is highest pain level
Two hours postpartum
Childbirth experience
Time Frame: 1 month postpartum
Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)
1 month postpartum
Apgar score
Time Frame: Five minutes postpartum
data from clinical records
Five minutes postpartum
Neonatal intensive care
Time Frame: 1 month postpartum
data from clinical records
1 month postpartum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data for primary and secondary outcome measures from the two groups will be submitted to the Swedish National Data Service (Svensk Nationell Datatjänst, SND), a national authority responsible for administrating sharing of research data.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Birth; Delayed

Clinical Trials on Oxytocin

Subscribe