Joint Ultrasound Evaluation of Asymptomatic Rheumatic Feet

August 29, 2012 updated by: Anamaria Jones, Federal University of São Paulo

Joint Ultrasound Evaluation of Asymptomatic Feet in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Controlled Study

Objectives: The aims of the present study were to compare ultrasound on asymptomatic feet of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and normal controls, determine the association between ultrasound and global disease activity, function and goniometric measures in patients with RA and determine the correlation between ultrasound and radiography in the detection of bone erosion.

Methods: The foot joints (talocrural, talocalcaneal, talonavicular, naviculocuneiform, calcaneocuboid, 5th tarsometatarsal and 1st to 5th metatarsophalangeal [MTP] joints) of 50 healthy subjects and 50 patients with RA (all with asymptomatic feet) were evaluated bilaterally regarding quantitative/semi-quantitative synovitis, semi-quantitative Power Doppler (PD) signals and erosion using ultrasound. Statistical significance was set to 5%.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP - Sao Paulo
      • Sao Paulo, SP - Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04023-062
        • Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Rheumatoid Arthritis Group:

  • RA with at least one year since diagnosis
  • Asymptomatic feet
  • Age between 18 and 65 years Control group
  • absence of known osteoarticular disease

Exclusion Criteria for both groups:

  • Peripheral venous insufficiency with retrograde venous flow and/or ochre dermatitis
  • Previous surgical intervention and/or fracture in feet/ankles
  • Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in previous three months in any of the joints evaluated
  • Foot neuropathy
  • Pain and swelling in feet or ankles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Rheumatoid Arthritis Group
RA with at least one year since diagnosis, asymptomatic feet, and age between 18 and 65 years
Control group
Absence of known osteoarticular disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of synovial effusion and/or synovial hypertrophy
Time Frame: Baseline
Ultrasound evaluation - quantitative measurement considered the distance between the joint capsule and subchondral bone of the joints studied (talocrural, talocalcaneal (medial, lateral and posterior windows); dorsal face of calcaneocuboid, talonavicular, medial naviculocuneiform, 5th tarsometatarsal and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) (dorsal and volar faces of 1st to 5th MTP joints and lateral face of 1st and 5th MTP joints). A modified score was used for the semi-quantitative measurement, ranging from 0 to 3: 0-no synovial thickening; 1-minimal synovial thickening in joint recess; 2-synovial thickening in entire joint recess causing bulging of joint capsule; and 3-synovial thickening in joint recess with bulging of joint capsule and extending to at least one bone diaphysis. "Presence of synovitis" was defined as synovial hypertrophy of at least Grade 1 in the semi-quantitative analysis (gray scale - ultrasound)
Baseline
Presence of bone erosion
Time Frame: Baseline
defined based on the preliminary OMERACT criteria: intra-articular discontinuity of the bone surface observed on two perpendicular planes. A previously established semi-quantitative score (0-3) was employed: 0-uniform bone surface; 1-irregular bone surface; 2-bone surface defect on two planes; 3-bone defect causing extensive bone destruction. The "presence of erosion" was defined as the presence of at least Grade 2 erosion.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: Baseline
A blinded radiologist analysed the presence of erosion in each joint studied. For such, ankle (AP and profile) and foot (AP and profile with load) radiographs were taken.
Baseline
Intraobserver and interobserver agreement
Time Frame: Baseline
The patients with RA were submitted to clinical and ultrasound evaluations of the feet and ankles on the same day. The ultrasound measurements intraobserver/interobserver agreement was performed on the talocrural, talonavicular and 5th MTP joints, using 20% of the sample. For this, the ultrasound exams were performed by another rheumatologist.
Baseline
Presence of synovial blood flow
Time Frame: Baseline
The presence of Power Doppler (PD) signals was evaluated in the bone margins, joint spaces, and peri-articular tissues (frequency of 8 MHz and pulse repetition rate of 750 MHz). A semi-quantitative score (0-3) was employed[14]: 0-no signal; 1-minimal signal, presence of simple vessels; 2-moderate signal, presence of confluent vessels with signal in less than 50% of the area evaluated; 3-intense signal (more than 50% of area evaluated). "Active synovitis" or "presence of PD signal" was defined as the presence of intra-articular synovitis with a positive PD signal (at least Grade 1).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rita Furtado, MD, Federal University of São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

3
Subscribe