- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01683903
Comparison of Cardiac Rehabilitation Benefits Between Coronary and Non-coronary Patients Through a 24 Months Follow-up After Myocardial Infarction: the "INCARD" Study (INCARD)
Comparison of Cardiac Rehabilitation Benefits Between Coronary and Non-coronary Patients Through a 24 Months Follow-up : the "INCARD" Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
We will undertake a prospective follow-up study of 150 rehabilitated patients with heart failure (75 C; 75 NC). The main objective will be to compare the benefits of rehabilitation between coronary and non-coronary patients based on functional improvement i.e. improvements of VO2max, LVEF (ultrasound method and/or isotopic), 6-min walk test, Minnesota index of quality of life. In addition, clinical outcomes (HR, SBP, DBP, BMI) and paraclinical data (creatinine clearance) will be measured as patients' standard clinical follow-up .
Clinical data of the patients admitted to the cardiac rehabilitation, including heart failure patients (LVEF <40), will be recorded after collection of their signed informed consent agreement. Patients will be addressed from heart failure intensive care units for coronary (USIC) or acute cardiac services to the rehabilitation department. Patients will be admitted in the rehabilitation department when there are clinically stable (at least three weeks after the acute episode). Etiology of the heart failure will be assessed and patients stratified as C or NC patients.
Expected Results We will estimate the mean duration of inpatient rehabilitation (H period). Then, we will follow patients' cardiac evaluation parameters recorded from an outpatient follow-up, first 3 months after inclusion and then every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up.
These data will allow for comparison of the benefits of rehabilitation between coronary (C) and non-coronary (NC) patients for each evaluation time point and will give information on the clinical improvement of each group of patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Corbeil, France, 91100
- Recruiting
- Centre Hospitalien Sud Francilien
-
Contact:
- Francois Koukoui, MD
- Phone Number: 00(33)161698086
- Email: francois.koukoui@ch-sud-francilien.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Francois Koukoui, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 18 years old,
- Signed informed consent,
- Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below 40 %,
- Stable for over 3 weeks,
- Known etiology,
- Able to do the performance test on treadmil or bicycle in order to have rehabilitation.
- No clinical avoidance reasons.
- Patient with health care registration.
- Agreement from the general practictioner and from the cardiologist that follows the patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age below 18 years old,
- Unstable heart failure,
- Unable to do a performance test as indicated above,
- Patients not able to understand clinical counseling.
- Patient under tutella.
- Pregnancy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Non coronary patients (NC)
Patient with myocardial infarction with non-coronary (NC) etiology
|
Coronary patients (C)
Patients with myocardial infarction due to coronary disease
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in VO2max every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
VO2max (L)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change in Left ventricular ejection fraction every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Left ventricular ejection fraction (ultrasound method and/or isotopic) in %
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on 6-min walk test every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
6-min walk test (m)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on Minnesota index of quality of life every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Minnesota index of quality of life.
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on heart rate every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Heart rate (bpm)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on systolic blood pressure every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on diastolic blood pressure every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on body mass index every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Measurement of weight and height, calculation of body mass index (kg/m2)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Change on creatine clearance every 6 months over the 24 months
Time Frame: every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
creatine clearance (ml/min)
|
every 6 months over the 24 months of outpatient follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Filippatos G, McMurray JJ, Ponikowski P, Poole-Wilson PA, Stromberg A, van Veldhuisen DJ, Atar D, Hoes AW, Keren A, Mebazaa A, Nieminen M, Priori SG, Swedberg K; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J. 2008 Oct;29(19):2388-442. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn309. Epub 2008 Sep 17. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2010 Apr;12(4):416. Dosage error in article text. Eur Heart J. 2010 Mar;31(5):624. Dosage error in article text.
- Koukoui F, Desmoulin F, Lairy G, Bleinc D, Boursiquot L, Galinier M, Smih F, Rouet P. Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients according to etiology: INCARD French study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Feb;94(7):e544. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000544.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- INCARD
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart Failure Stage CFrance
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Lancaster General HospitalLouise von Hess Medical Research InstituteEnrolling by invitationDiastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Giresun UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureTurkey
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted