Whole Body Vibration Exercise for Elderly With Cognitive Impairments

November 26, 2012 updated by: Marco Yiu-Chung Pang, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

The Effects of Whole Body Vibration Exercise Training on Physical Functioning and Falls in Community-dwelling Elderly With Cognitive Impairments

The whole body vibration exercise group will have significantly more improvement in mobility, muscle strength, balance, balance confidence, and cognitive function with a lower fall rate than the control group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Territories
      • Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Jockey Club Centre for Positive Ageing
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Timothy Kwok, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a diagnosis of mild or moderate dementia, with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 1 to 2, and a Cantonese Mini-mental State Examination (CMMSE) score at 10 or above but below the local cutoff for dementia (18-22, depending on education level)
  • able to stand for at least 1 minute with or without hand support
  • living in the community
  • having an informed consent (from the primary caregiver)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant musculoskeletal conditions (e.g. amputations)
  • metal implants in the lower extremity
  • recent fracture in the lower extremity
  • vestibular disorders
  • peripheral vascular disease
  • other serious illnesses or contraindications to exercise.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Whole body vibration exercise
The experimental group will receive 2 sessions of whole body vibration exercise training and conventional exercise per week for a period of 9 weeks. The total duration of vibration exposure per session will range from 4 to 6 minutes. The vibration frequency and amplitude used will be 30 Hz and 1 mm, respectively.
The whole body vibration will be delivered by a platform that can generate vibration signals (Powerplate). The total duration of vibration exposure per session will range from 4 to 6 minutes. The vibration bouts (30-45 seconds per bout) will be interspersed with a 1 to 2 minutes of rest period. While standing on the vibration platform, subjects will be instructed to repeat two exercises: (1) static semi-squats, and (2) dynamic semi-squats.
The conventional exercise training will involve a combination of upper limb and lower limb stretching and strengthening exercises, balance training, and gait re-education.
Active Comparator: Conventional exercise
This group will receive 2 sessions of conventional exercise training per week for a period of 9 weeks.
The conventional exercise training will involve a combination of upper limb and lower limb stretching and strengthening exercises, balance training, and gait re-education.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed-up-and-go test
Time Frame: week 0
A measure of functional mobility
week 0
Timed-up-and-go test
Time Frame: week 9
week 9
Timed-up-and-go test
Time Frame: week 21
week 21

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Activities-specific balance confidence scale
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: week 9
week 9
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: week 21
week 21
Activities-specific balance confidence scale
Time Frame: week 9
week 9
Activities-specific balance confidence scale
Time Frame: week 21
week 21
five times sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
five times sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: week 9
week 9
five times sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: week 21
week 21
Mini-Mental State Examination
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Mini-Mental State Examination
Time Frame: week 9
week 9
Mini-Mental State Examination
Time Frame: week 21
week 21
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's disease
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's disease
Time Frame: week 9
week 9
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's disease
Time Frame: week 21
week 21
incidence of falls
Time Frame: daily starting from week 0 to week 33
Incidence of falls will be recorded by using fall diaries.
daily starting from week 0 to week 33

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Pang, PhD, Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20120929006

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe