Efficacy Study of Ramosetron in the Setting of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

December 5, 2014 updated by: Ki-Seong Eom, MD, The Catholic University of Korea

Prospective, Single-arm Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Ramosetron in the Setting of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

  1. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of ramosetron for the prevention of emesis and the control of nausea and vomiting despite of the prophylactic antiemetic treatment during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  2. The study hypothesis is that ramosetron is effective for the prevention of emesis and control of emesis and/or vomiting that develop after the prophylactic antiemetic therapy in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

65

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • Recruiting
        • Catholic Blood & Marrow Transplantation Center, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jong-Wook Lee, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioned with highly or moderately emetogenic drugs or total body irradiation (TBI) for hematologic malignancies
  2. aged over 18 yrs
  3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 - 2
  4. patients who are able to take oral medications
  5. patients who get well-informed and sign the consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients complicating

    • severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 210 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg)
    • significant heart disease such as congestive heart failure
    • renal insufficiency (serum Cr >= 3.0 mg/dL)
    • liver disease (Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 upper normal limit; alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 2 upper normal limit)
  2. Patients complicated by conditions such as gastrointestinal obstruction or active peptic ulcer causing emesis
  3. Patients with brain tumor, brain metastasis and epilepsy
  4. Patients with the history of extrapyramidal symptom
  5. Patients with the history of allergy to serotonin antagonists
  6. pregnant or lactating women
  7. Patients with drug abuse or psychiatric illness, or patients who are not capable of the normal communications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ramosetron

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
efficacy of ramosetron in terms of complete response (no emesis, no rescue therapy) during the conditioning regimen and within 3 or 6 days after the end of the conditioning regimen
Time Frame: within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen
within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the efficacy of second dose of ramosetron for the treatment of breakthrough emesis
Time Frame: within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen
within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the number of vomiting episodes
Time Frame: within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen
within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen
grade of nausea and need for rescue therapy
Time Frame: within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen
within 1 week after the end of conditioning regimen

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Malignancies

Clinical Trials on ramosetron

3
Subscribe