Transarterial Ethanol Ablation(TEA) for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma(HCC)

August 29, 2019 updated by: Simon Yu, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Outcome, Treatment Toxicity and Tumor Response of Transarterial Ablation(TEA) for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma(HCC)

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the clinical outcome, treatment toxicity and tumor response of TEA for unresectable HCC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Transarterial therapy has been playing an important role in the treatment algorithm for patients with multifocal or large intrahepatic lesions not eligible for surgical resection, transplantation, or local ablative therapy. Among the various options of transarterial therapy including chemoembolization (TACE), bland embolization, radioembolization, and TEA, chemoembolization is the only one that has been proven to be of survival benefits versus best supportive care in randomized controlled trials. TEA is a hybrid of bland embolization and chemical ablation. Utilizing a liquid agent of Lipiodol-ethanol mixture consisting of 33% ethanol by volume, TEA offers complete and long lasting embolization of both the arterioles and portal venules supplying the tumor and could possibly be more effective than particulate embolic agents in tumor vessel embolization. The component of ethanol very likely offers synergistic effect to embolization and causes tumor ablation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Clinicl Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinsese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent by patient
  • Age above 18 years
  • Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance score 2 or below
  • No serious concurrent medical illness
  • No prior treatment or surgery for HCC
  • Histologically or cytologically proven HCC except for lesions of size 1 to 2 cm, with typical features of HCC on two dynamic imaging techniques, or lesions larger than 2cm, with typical features on one dynamic imaging techniques, or lesions larger than 2cm with alpha feto protein(AFP) level > 200 ng/mL
  • Unresectable disease without extra-hepatic involvement on chest X-ray(CXR) and CT
  • Massive expansive tumor type with measurable lesion on CT
  • Total tumor mass < 50% liver volume
  • Tumor size ≤ 15cm in largest dimension
  • Tumor number ≤ 5

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior malignancy except on the condition that the patient has been disease free for ≥ 3 years
  • Concurrent ischemic heart disease or heart failure
  • History of acute tumor rupture presenting with hemo-peritoneum
  • Serum creatinine level > 180 umol/L
  • Biliary obstruction not amenable to percutaneous drainage
  • Child-Pugh C cirrhosis
  • History of hepatic encephalopathy
  • Intractable ascites not controllable by medical therapy
  • History of variceal bleeding within last 3 months; serum total bilirubin level ≥ 50 umol/L
  • Serum albumin level < 25g/L
  • International normalized ratio(INR) > 1.5
  • Extrahepatic metastasis
  • Infiltrative or diffuse tumor
  • Tumor number > 5
  • Thrombosis of target hepatic artery
  • Partial or complete thrombosis of the main portal vein; tumor invasion of portal branch of contralateral lobe
  • Hepatic vein tumor thrombus
  • Significant arterio-portal venous shunt
  • Significant arterial-hepatic venous shunt

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Transarterial Ethanol Ablation (TEA)
Two treatment sessions at 2 months apart were given and started within 4 weeks after randomization.
Arterial feeders to tumors were identified and catheterized with a microcatheter to a branch supplying a Couinaud segment or subsegmental level for delivery of the therapeutic agent, which was Lipiodol-ethanol mixture at 2:1 ratio by volume for TEA (Lipiodol Ultrafluide, Guerbet, France; Dehydrated alcohol [absolute alcohol], Martindale Pharmaceuticals, United Kingdom). The agents were delivered under fluoroscopic control to completely fill up the vasculature of all tumors. The maximum total volume of Lipiodol-ethanol mixture or cisplatin emulsion to be delivered in one treatment session was 60 mL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival and treatment-related toxicity
Time Frame: Overall survival is studied from treatment to death from any cause, for an estimated period of up to 60 months. Treatment-related toxicity is studied up to 3 months after treatment

Overall survival was defined as date of treatment to date of death from any cause. Patients alive at the end of follow-up were censored.

Clinical and laboratory data were documented prospectively at baseline, during hospitalization, and at 7, 14, and 30 day, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Laboratory findings were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.

Overall survival is studied from treatment to death from any cause, for an estimated period of up to 60 months. Treatment-related toxicity is studied up to 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to progression(TTP)
Time Frame: Time to progression is studied from treatment to disease progression, for an estimated period of up to 60 months.
TTP was defined as date of treatment to date of first CT evidence of disease progression. Patient death during follow-up without CT progression was censored.
Time to progression is studied from treatment to disease progression, for an estimated period of up to 60 months.
Progression free survival(PFS)
Time Frame: Progression free survival is studied from treatment to disease progression or death from any cause, for an estimated period of up to 60 months.
PFS was defined as date of treatment to date of either first CT evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. Patients alive and free of progression at the end of follow-up were censored.
Progression free survival is studied from treatment to disease progression or death from any cause, for an estimated period of up to 60 months.
Tumor response
Time Frame: Tumor response is studied at 6 months after treatment
Treatment response of individual treated tumor lesions was evaluated with CT and classified according to a system combining the recommendation of European Association for the Study of the Liver and the guidelines of World Health Organization, which was considered a preferred method of response assessment following transarterial or locoregional therapies for HCC. Tumor response was classified into 4 categories: 1) complete response (CR), 2) partial response (PR), 3) static disease (SD), or 4) intralesional progression.
Tumor response is studied at 6 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simon CH Yu, MD, FRCR, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on TEA

Subscribe