Pharmacodynamic Effect of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in Diabetes

A Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk of adverse atherothrombotic events. This may be in part attributed to the fact that these patients have reduced response to oral antiplatelet medications, in particular the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor clopidogrel, used for secondary prevention of ischemic events. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are recently approved P2Y12 receptor inhibitors which, compared with clopidogrel, have more potent antiplatelet effects. Head-to-head comparisons between the two drugs are lacking.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Prasugrel; Drug: Ticagrelor

Detailed Description

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk of adverse atherothrombotic events. This may be in part attributed to the fact that these patients have reduced response to oral antiplatelet medications, in particular the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor clopidogrel, used for secondary prevention of ischemic events. Upregulation of platelet P2Y12 receptor mediated signaling has been shown in DM patients and may contribute to these pharmacodynamic observations, suggesting the need for more potent P2Y12 inhibiting strategies in these patients. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are recently approved P2Y12 receptor inhibitors which, compared with clopidogrel, have more potent antiplatelet effects. Therefore, prasugrel and ticagrelor represent attractive treatment options for patients with DM. This is also supported by the DM sub-group analysis of the pivotal TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) and PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trials, which have led to approval of prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. Although results of these sub-group analysis suggest that prasugrel is associated with an enhanced benefit in DM patients, while ticagrelor effects in DM patients are consistent with the overall study population, only head-to-head comparisons between the two drugs can elucidate if these exert differential effects on platelets from DM patients. However, the pharmacodynamic studies comparing prasugrel with ticagrelor in DM patients are lacking. The ever growing DM population at high risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events underscores the need to define antiplatelet treatment strategies leading to more optimal platelet inhibition in these patients.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 50
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Florida
    • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
      • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with known (angiographically documented) CAD.
• On maintenance treatment with aspirin (81 mg per day) for at least 1-month as per standard of care.
• Type 2 DM on treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin.
• Age between 18 and 74 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of stroke, transient ischemic attack or intracranial bleeding.
• On treatment with a P2Y12 receptor antagonist (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor).
• Known allergies to aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor.
• Weight <60kg.
• On treatment with oral anticoagulant (Vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran).
• Blood dyscrasia or bleeding diathesis.
• Platelet count <80x106/mL.
• Hemoglobin <10 g/dL.
• Active bleeding or hemodynamic instability.
• Creatinine Clearance <30 mL/minute.
• Baseline ALT >2.5 times the upper limit of normal.
• Hb A1c ≥ 10 mg/dL within 3 months.
• Patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) or high degree AV block without pacemaker protection.
• Drugs interfering CYP3A4 metabolism (to avoid interaction with Ticagrelor): Ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, and telithromizycin.

• Pregnant females*.

  • Women of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives) while participating in the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Prasugrel first, then ticagrelor; Patients randomized to prasugrel will receive prasugrel loading dose followed by maintenance dose. Randomized treatment will be maintained for 1-week (7±2 days). After completion of the 1-week treatment period, patients will discontinued the study medications for 2-4 weeks (wash-out period) and then will cross over to the alternate treatment (ticagrelor), which will be administered for 1-week.	Drug: Prasugrel; Patients receiving prasugrel will be treated with 60mg loading dose and 10mg maintenance dose; Other Names: Effient; Drug: Ticagrelor; Patients receiving ticagrelor will be treated with a 180mg loading dose and 90mg bid maintenance dose; Other Names: Brillinta
Active Comparator: Ticagrelor first, then prasugrel; Patients randomized to ticagrelor will receive prasugrel loading dose followed by maintenance dose. Randomized treatment will be maintained for 1-week (7±2 days). After completion of the 1-week treatment period, patients will discontinued the study medications for 2-4 weeks (wash-out period) and then will cross over to the alternate treatment (prasugrel), which will be administered for 1-week.	Drug: Prasugrel; Patients receiving prasugrel will be treated with 60mg loading dose and 10mg maintenance dose; Other Names: Effient; Drug: Ticagrelor; Patients receiving ticagrelor will be treated with a 180mg loading dose and 90mg bid maintenance dose; Other Names: Brillinta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
P2Y12 Reaction Units	The primary endpoint is the comparison of the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) values determined by VerifyNow between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Treatment effects were evaluated comparing PRU observed in the overall patient population after prasugrel treatment with those achieved after ticagrelor regardless of the sequence.	1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
P2Y12 Reaction Units	Comparison of the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) values determined by VerifyNow between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel)	2 hours
Platelet Reactivity Index	The comparison of the platelet reactivity index (PRI) values determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). VASP was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies. A low PRI is indicative of high platelet inhibition.	1 week
Platelet Reactivity Index	The comparison of the platelet reactivity index (PRI) values determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) between both treatments (ticagrelor or prasugrel). VASP was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies. A low PRI is indicative of high platelet inhibition.	2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Florida

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Franchi F, Rollini F, Aggarwal N, Hu J, Kureti M, Durairaj A, Duarte VE, Cho JR, Been L, Zenni MM, Bass TA, Angiolillo DJ. Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease: The OPTIMUS (Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus)-4 Study. Circulation. 2016 Sep 13;134(11):780-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023402. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: February 1, 2013
• Primary Completion (Actual): July 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 8, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 10, 2013
• First Posted (Estimate): May 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): October 17, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 22, 2016
• Last Verified: June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Coronary artery disease; prasugrel; ticagrelor; Diabetes mellitus
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Metabolic Diseases; Arteriosclerosis; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Endocrine System Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Myocardial Ischemia; Coronary Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Neurotransmitter Agents; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Purinergic Antagonists; Purinergic Agents; Ticagrelor; Prasugrel Hydrochloride
• Other Study ID Numbers: UFJ 2011-184

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO