Using Mental Health Telemetry to Predict Relapse and Re-hospitalization in Mood Disorders (PATH-MOD)

April 14, 2016 updated by: Dr. David Kreindler
Mood disorders -- major depression, bipolar disorder, and dysthymia -- frequently recur; they affect one in four people during their lives. At Sunnybrook, 75% of inpatient admissions are due to mood disorders. Mental health telemetry (MHT) lets patients in the community use cell phones to track the severity of their mood symptoms over time, and enables clinicians to view these symptom ratings in real-time. Evidence suggests that MHT is better for detecting exacerbations of illness earlier than standard clinical practice alone. In this study, we will assess if MHT can reduce re-hospitalization rates in previously-hospitalized patients with mood disorders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The mood disorders (major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and dysthymia) are a significant public health issue: mood disorders affect approximately one in four people during their lives; in total, over 8 million Canadians are affected by mood disorders, costing the economy over $6 billion annually. Mood disorders are generally recurrent: approximately 50% of cases of major depressive disorder will relapse at least once; 15% will run a chronic course. With bipolar disorder, a chronic course of episodes of depression and/or mania intermixed with episodes of normal mood is typical. At Sunnybrook (SHSC), 75% of inpatient mental health admissions are due to mood disorders. Clinically, with mood disorders, earlier recognition of symptom changes in patients provides greater potential for early intervention and suppression of relapses, which in turn leads to reduced outpatient resource utilization, fewer Emergency Department visits, and fewer readmissions.

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a body of work developed in the late 90s and early 00's, focuses on using data collected from subjects living their daily lives in their natural environments using minimally invasive techniques to improve the quality of the data collected. Mental health telemetry (MHT) is an evolution of EMA. MHT was developed here at Sunnybrook in partnership with the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Toronto; it uses wirelessly networked handheld computers - typically, cell phones - to collect self-report data on symptoms of illness and then transmit it in real-time to a central database. Principal advantages of MHT over EMA include (i) the ability to time- and date-stamp data, thus eliminating retrospective record completion, and (ii) the ability to observe and monitor data flow in real-time, without having to wait for participants to upload or deliver the data (e.g., at their next doctors' appointment).

MHT has been used to collect rich sets of longitudinal self-report ratings from patients while they live their daily lives in the community; populations studied include adults with depression, premenstrual syndrome, and bipolar disorder (for as long as 18 months), as well as teens with mood swings (for as long as nine months). Adherence to daily (or more frequent) symptom reporting using MHT in these studies has been very good, with adherence rates of 75±5 % over the duration of the studies.

MHT has considerable potential to reduce rates of inpatient re-hospitalization for mood disorders. EMA methods have previously shown to be superior to standard patient follow-ups for detecting medication response in depression14 or days ill in bipolar disorder18. While numerous previous studies have looked at general patterns of recurrence and prognostic factors in the long-term course of major depressive disorder4;23;24;27 and bipolar disorder, none have looked at using EMA or MHT data to monitor for signs of imminent relapse in individual cases. The rich data stream provided by MHT will allow us to do this for the first time, similar to how ECG telemetry is routinely used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Doing so will enable clinicians to trigger early community- or outpatient-based interventions, thus reducing the likelihood of relapse and / or hospitalization.

One limitation of the MHT studies to-date has been the platform-specific nature of the MHT systems used: rather than using platform-independent software, the systems deployed to date have been custom-created for specific cell-phone platforms (e.g., the Kyocera pdQ 1900, the Palm Treo family of SmartPhones, or the Motorola QA30). As a result, until now, MHT has been limited use by participants in research studies who were provided with a research-funded cell phone.

Therefore, to explore the feasibility of using MHT to reduce re-hospitalization in patients with diagnosed mood disorders, we will:

  1. Upgrade our existing patient MHT software (for recording MHT) to a web-based platform, thus removing all hardware dependency from MHT and allowing anyone who has a web-capable cell phone to use MHT essentially without cost;
  2. Upgrade our existing clinician PATH software (for viewing patients' MHT), optimizing its user interface to make it easy for clinicians to rapidly and effectively visualize their patients' telemetry;
  3. Distribute clinician PATH software to interested clinicians within the SHSC Department of Psychiatry, to enable clinicians to receive daily, patient-generated, quantitative symptom severity ratings as well as medication adherence and side-effect reports from their patients. (Clinicians will use this information in collaboration with their patients to aid in monitoring patients' mental status over the course of this study.)
  4. Over the duration of the study, distribute patient MHT software to a random sample of patients with (i) a mood disorder being discharged from Sunnybrook's inpatient mental health ward (F2) or (ii) bipolar disorder being followed in the outpatient psychiatry clinics at Sunnybrook; then,
  5. Compare re-hospitalization rates and quality-of-life measures of MHT users over a 6 month period to a control group of similar patients not using MHT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed DSM-IV mood disorder
  • Long-term follow-up at Sunnybrook
  • At least two lifetime hospitalizations for mood disorders at the time of recruitment
  • Own a web-enabled cell phone,
  • Be willing to start or continue with mood journaling using either MHT or some other platform / medium
  • Be able to be successfully trained to use MHT,
  • Have provided informed consent to participate,
  • Have a clinician in the Department of Psychiatry at Sunnybrook who is providing the majority of their mental health care and is participating in this study,
  • In the case of participants under the age of 18 years, have the assent of at least one custodial parent and / or legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment-as-usual
Treatment-as-usual, with no active intervention or follow-up. TAU patients will have readmission events monitored over the six-month interval by the study RA via periodic chart reviews and updates from their clinicians
Experimental: Mental Health Telemetry (MHT)
Patients in the MHT group will be encouraged to provide daily symptom self-reports using MHT. MHT patients will also have readmission events monitored over the six-month interval by the study RA via periodic chart reviews and updates from their clinicians
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) focuses on using data collected from subjects living their daily lives in their natural environments using minimally invasive techniques to improve the quality of the data collected. MHT is an evolution of EMA. MHT was developed at Sunnybrook in partnership with the University of Toronto; it uses cell phones to collect self-report data on symptoms of illness and then transmit it in real-time to a central database. Principal advantages of MHT over EMA include the ability to time- and date-stamp data, thus eliminating retrospective record completion, and the ability to observe and monitor data flow in real-time, without having to wait for participants to upload or deliver the data (e.g., at their next doctors' appointment).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Re-hospitalization rate
Time Frame: Six months
Six months
Quality-of-life
Time Frame: Six months
Quality-of-Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD) self-report scale, completed at entry and bi-monthly
Six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse rate
Time Frame: Six months
Rate of recurrence of clinical episode of mood disorders
Six months
Participation rate
Time Frame: At baseline
Proportion of eligible patients who agree to participate
At baseline
Uptake rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Percent of patients using MHT relative to number of eligible patients
3 months
Reporting rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean number of MHT reports generated per day among MHT users
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M Kreindler, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Telemetry (MHT)

3
Subscribe