- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06611670
Outcomes of High Vs Physiological Intraocular Pressure During Cataract Surgery Using ACTIVE SENTRY (ACTIVESENTRY)
September 22, 2024 updated by: Samir Jabbour, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Cataract surgery is a widely performed procedure across the world that helps restore vision in many patients suffering from cataracts.
Irrigation is an essential component of the surgery.
Fluid is constantly circulated to help regulate temperature as heat is generated with ultrasound energy, to minimize tissue trauma, and to create an intraocular pressure (IOP) sufficient to keep the anterior chamber (AC) stable.
In parallel, aspiration brings the components of the cataract closer to the surgical instrument.
A balance between irrigation and aspiration during surgery is essential to maintain stability in the AC.
However, an ideal flow rate, which influences IOP during surgery, is yet to be determined.
Most recent studies with Centurion Active Sentry show that there is similar efficiency between higher and lower IOP settings.
Traditionally, high-flow rates have been used in advanced cataracts and are believed to make space in the AC.
However, they are known to create fluid turbulence and are associated with risks of tissue damage, including cell loss in one of the cornea's layers.
High IOP during surgery has also been shown to cause damage to the optic nerve as well as to the retina.
Distorting and stretching the AC during phacoemulsification have also been associated with increased pain experienced by the patient.
Comfort can be achieved by lowering pressure levels.
Low-flow rates have a better safety profile, reduce IOP and pressure fluctuations while offering equal efficiency, including comparable surgical time.
Using central corneal thickness (CCT) as an indicator of corneal trauma, it has been shown that patients that have had surgery with low-flow rates present no change in the CCT postoperatively as opposed to patients in the high-flow rates.
As less fluid turbulence is created with low-flow rates, there is decreased risk of fragment contact with the cornea's inner surface, thus reducing cell loss.
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. developed Active Fluidics which allows to stabilize intraocular pressure and prevent IOP fluctuations as well as IOP surges during surgery.
It is now further equipped with the Active Sentry handpiece which is integrated to the surgical instrument and acts as a sensor to pressure variation.
It allows rapid feedback to maintain a stable AC.
Our research project aims to assess the outcomes following phacoemulsification done with physiological IOP with the help of the Active Sentry handpiece compared to traditional high IOP levels.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cataract surgery is a widely performed procedure across the world that helps restore vision in many patients suffering from cataracts.
The surgery has known many improvements across time and continues to do so.
Irrigation is an essential component of the surgery.
Fluid is constantly being circulated to help regulate temperature as heat is generated with the use of ultrasound energy, to minimize tissue trauma, and to create an intraocular pressure sufficient to keep the anterior chamber stable.
In parallel, aspiration brings the components of the cataract closer to the surgical instrument.
A balance between irrigation and aspiration during surgery is essential to maintain stability in the anterior chamber.
However, an ideal flow rate, which influences intraocular pressure (IOP) during surgery, is yet to be determined.
Most recent studies with Centurion Active Sentry (maintaining vacuum and aspiration rates the same) show that there is similar efficiency between higher and lower IOP settings.
Traditionally, high-flow rates have been used in advanced cataracts and are believed to increase the space in the anterior chamber.
However, they are known to create fluid turbulence and are associated with risks of tissue damage, including cell loss in the endothelial layer of the cornea.
High intra-ocular pressure during surgery has also been shown to cause damage to the optic nerve as well as to the retina.
Distorting and stretching the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification have also been associated with increased pain experienced by the patient.
Comfort can be achieved by lowering pressure levels.
Low-flow rates have a better safety profile, reduce IOP and pressure fluctuations while offering equal efficiency, including comparable surgical time.
Using central corneal thickness (CCT) as an indicator of corneal trauma, it has been shown that patients that have had surgery with low-flow rates present no change in the CCT postoperatively while patients in the high-flow rates show signs of corneal damage as well as greater anterior segment inflammation.
As less fluid turbulence is created with low-flow rates, there is decreased risk of fragment contact with the cornea's inner surface, thus reducing cell loss.
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. developed Active Fluidics which allows to stabilize intraocular pressure and prevent IOP fluctuations as well as IOP surges during surgery.
It is now further equipped with the Active Sentry handpiece which is integrated to the surgical instrument and acts as a sensor to pressure variation.
It allows rapid feedback to maintain a stable anterior chamber.
Our research project aims to assess the outcomes following phacoemulsification done with physiological IOP with the help of the Active Sentry handpiece compared to traditional high IOP levels.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
38
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Samir Jabbour, MD,CM,FRCSC
- Phone Number: 11550 514-890-8000
- Email: Samir.Jabbour.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marie-Catherine Tessier, M.Sc.
- Phone Number: 11550 514 890-8000
- Email: marie-catherine.tessier.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- No prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery
- Bilateral visually significant cataract, similar in density (LOCS III grade 2+), undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Equal dilated pupil size ≥6mm, no use of pupil expansion devices
- Axial length 22-26mm, refractive error between -5.00D to +5.00D and cylinder ≤ 3.00D, normal K values <47.00D
- Axial eye length cannot vary by more than 0.4 mm between eyes of an individual patient
- Normal CCT range 540µm ± 50
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of corneal disease or dystrophies
- Media opacification for reasons other than cataract
- Compromised zonular integrity or stability.
- Retinal and retinal vascular pathologies, age-related macular degeneration
- Glaucoma
- Patients with uncontrolled systematic diseases, including hypertension, diabetes, systemic cardiovascular diseases, and hematological diseases.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cataract surgery with Active Sentry
Cataract surgery with low IOP values (32mmHg)
|
Surgical instrument that detects changes in intraocular pressure and allows rapid feedback to stabilize pressure during cataract surgery.
|
|
Active Comparator: High IOP
Cataract surgery with high IOP (60mmHg) which is the average pressure at which cataract surgery is being performed currently
|
Cataract surgery performed with high intraocular pressures
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Central corneal thickness at 1 day postoperatively
Time Frame: 1 day postoperatively
|
Using central corneal thickness (CCT) as an indicator of corneal trauma, it has been shown that patients that have had surgery with low-flow rates present no change in the CCT postoperatively.
CCT will be measured using a pachymetry (Normal CCT range 540µm ± 50).
|
1 day postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Volume of balanced salt solution used during surgery
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Volume of balanced salt solution as measured by the Active Sentry Centurion machine
|
During surgery
|
|
Total ultrasound time and total aspiration time
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Total ultrasound time and total aspiration time as measured by the Active Sentry Centurion machine
|
During surgery
|
|
Endothelial cell loss (inner surface of the cornea)
Time Frame: At month 1 and month 3 postoperatively.
|
Endothelial cell count measured by specular microscopy
|
At month 1 and month 3 postoperatively.
|
|
Central corneal thickness
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively
|
Using central corneal thickness (CCT) as an indicator of corneal trauma, it has been shown that patients that have had surgery with low-flow rates present no change in the CCT postoperatively.
CCT will be measured using a pachymetry (Normal CCT range 540µm ± 50).
|
1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively
|
|
Corneal clarity
Time Frame: Day 1, week 1, month 1 and month 3 postoperatively
|
Measured uring the Pentacam corneal densitometry
|
Day 1, week 1, month 1 and month 3 postoperatively
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 postoperatively
|
Evaluated using a Snellen chart
|
Day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 postoperatively
|
|
Low contrast evaluation
Time Frame: Day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 postoperatively
|
Evaluated using the CSV-1000 Contrast Sensitivity chart with glare
|
Day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 postoperatively
|
|
Intraocular pressure
Time Frame: Day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 postoperatively
|
Measured using the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
|
Day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 postoperatively
|
|
Cystoid macular edema
Time Frame: 1 month postoperatively
|
Evaluated using the Macular Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
|
1 month postoperatively
|
|
Rate of reverse pupillary block
Time Frame: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively
|
Evaluated using slit lamp examination
|
1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively
|
|
Posterior capsular tear
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Complication during cataract surgery
|
During surgery
|
|
Posterior capsular rupture
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Complication during cataract surgery
|
During surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Samir Jabbour, MD,CM,FRCSC, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Zhao Y, Li X, Tao A, Wang J, Lu F. Intraocular pressure and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure during three simulated steps of phacoemulsification in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;50(6):2927-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2996. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
- Vasavada AR, Praveen MR, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Raj SM, Asnani PK, Garg VS. Impact of high and low aspiration parameters on postoperative outcomes of phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.009.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 22, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
September 25, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 25, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 22, 2024
Last Verified
September 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-11959
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cataract
-
Colvard Kandavel Eye CenterEnrolling by invitationCataract | Cataract Bilateral | Cataract Surgery | Cataract (Post-operative Cataract Surgery Follow-up)United States
-
Matthew RauenNot yet recruitingNuclear Cataract | Cataract Surgery Anesthesia | Cataract and IOL Surgery | Cataract Surgery ExperienceUnited States
-
Züleyha SönmezAtaturk UniversityActive, not recruitingCataract Surgery | Cataract Patients | Cataract After SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Stanford UniversityEnrolling by invitationIntraocular Lens | Cataract Extraction | Cataract Surgery | Eye Disorders | Cataract and IOL Surgery | Cataract Surgery ExperienceUnited States
-
Gemini Eye ClinicRecruitingBilateral Cataract | Unilateral CataractCzechia
-
Seva Canada SocietyPragyaan Sustainable Health Outcomes Foundation; Sadgura Netra ChikitsalayaNot yet recruitingCataract (Post-operative Cataract Surgery Follow-up)
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación...CompletedCataract | Cataract Mature | Cataract, Nuclear
-
Nicole Fram M.D.RecruitingCataract Bilateral | Nuclear Sclerosis of the Lens | Phacoemulsification Cataract SurgeryUnited States
-
Johannes Kepler University of LinzCompletedCataract Complicated | Cataract Complications OperationsAustria
-
Adaptilens, Inc.Not yet recruitingAphakia Cataract
Clinical Trials on Cataract surgery with Active Sentry
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...WithdrawnCataract | Astigmatism | Corneal Endothelial Cell LossCanada
-
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBAUnknown
-
Medical University of GrazRecruiting
-
Cataract and Laser Institute of Southern OregonSengiCompletedCataractUnited States
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompleted
-
Diablo Eye AssociatesAlcon ResearchTerminatedOpen Angle GlaucomaUnited States
-
Wenzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingCataract | Corneal Astigmatism
-
Ilasis LaserCompletedCataract SurgeryFrance