EUS-FNA Versus KHB in Diagnostics of Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors

November 23, 2015 updated by: Vincent Zoundjiekpon, Vitkovice Hospital

Endosonography-Guided Fine-Needle-Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Versus Key Hole Biopsy (KHB) in Diagnostics of Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors - a Randomized Trial

Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors are tumors arising from subepithelial layers of esophageal, gastric or duodenal wall. They usually have an intact mucosa lining on the inner surface. The prognosis and treatment of these tumors depend on their correct diagnostics and mitotic activity in case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST). A standard forceps biopsy of mucosa is usually not helpful. Therefore, biopsy techniques capable of reaching deeper layer of Upper GUT are needed. The investigators compare KHB and EUS-FNA in the diagnostics of Upper gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with endoscopically detected submucosal tumors of Upper GUT with diameter ≥ 2cm are enrolled in the trial.

According to randomization, the patients are allocated to either EUS-FNA by 22G needle or KHB consisting of forceps biopsy through mucosal incision by a needle knife, both with subsequent histological/cytological and immunohistochemical evaluation of the specimen. The success of tissue diagnostics was evaluated as well as the possibility to determine the mitotic activity in case of GIST. In case of failure of the initial method, the other method was performed (cross-over design). Patients are hospitalized and kept under observation during 24 hours after the biopsy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ostrava, Czech Republic, 703 84
        • Recruiting
        • Digestive Diseases Center, Vìtkovice Hospital
      • Ostrava, Czech Republic, 70384
        • Recruiting
        • Digestive Diseases Center, Vìtkovice Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vincent Zoundjiekpon, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Submucosal tumor with endoscopically normal intact mucosa
  • Tumor size: 20mm or more
  • Localization of tumors: esophagus,stomach, duodenum
  • Age: 18 years and older
  • The patient´s consent with a diagnostic procedure .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Endoscopically nonbuilding tumor
  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Coagulopathy (INR > 1,5, platelets < 100)
  • Tumor size < 20mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Key Hole Biopsy
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are, according to randomization, allocated to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy with Key Hole Biopsy consisting of forceps biopsy through mucosal incision by a needle knife, with subsequent cytological /histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of specimen. In the case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), the possibility to determine the mitotic activity is evaluated.
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are, according to randomization, allocated to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy with Key Hole Biopsy consisting of forceps biopsy through mucosal incision by a needle knife, with subsequent cytological /histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of specimen. In the case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), the possibility to determine the mitotic activity is evaluated.
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are after randomization allocated to undergo endosonography-guided fine-needle-aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) by 22G needle, with subsequent cytological /histological and immunohistochemical examination of the specimen. In the case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), the possibility to determine mitotic activity is evaluated. In case of failure of this method, the second one is performed.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: EUS-FNA
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are after randomization allocated to undergo endosonography-guided fine-needle-aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) by 22G needle, with subsequent cytological /histological and immunohistochemical examination of the specimen. In the case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), the possibility to determine the mitotic activity is evaluated.
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are, according to randomization, allocated to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy with Key Hole Biopsy consisting of forceps biopsy through mucosal incision by a needle knife, with subsequent cytological /histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of specimen. In the case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), the possibility to determine the mitotic activity is evaluated.
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are after randomization allocated to undergo endosonography-guided fine-needle-aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) by 22G needle, with subsequent cytological /histological and immunohistochemical examination of the specimen. In the case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), the possibility to determine mitotic activity is evaluated. In case of failure of this method, the second one is performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the yield and success of KHB and EUS-FNA in cytological / histological and immunohistochemical diagnostics of Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors.
Time Frame: 5 years
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are randomized and then are allocated to either EUS-FNA by 22G needle or KHB consisting of forceps biopsy through mucosal incision by a needle knife, both with subsequent histological/cytological and imunohistochemical evaluation of the specimen. The success of tissue diagnostics was evaluated.In case of failure of the initial method, the other method was performed (cross-over design).
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of mitotic activity in case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Time Frame: 5 years
Patients with endoscopically detected Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors with diameter ≥ 2cm are randomized and then allocated to either EUS-FNA by 22G needle or KHB consisting of forceps biopsy through mucosal incision by a needle knife, both with subsequent histological/cytological and imunohistochemical evaluation of the specimen. In case of GIST the possibility to determine the mitotic activity was evalueted.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Zoundjiekpon, MD, Vitkovice Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe