Lidocaine Injection Versus Sham Needling in Treating Whiplash Associated Disorder

February 22, 2017 updated by: Maggie Qiyun Shi, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Lidocaine Injection Versus Sham Needling in Treating Whiplash Associated disorder-a Randomized Controlled Trial

To determine the efficacy of lidocaine injection of trigger points versus subcutaneous injection in patients with subacute whiplash associated disorder following injury.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

This is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of lidocaine injection of trigger points versus subcutaneous injection in patients with subacute whiplash associated disorder following injury. Outcomes include pain, objective assessment, self-report function recovery, impact on work performance and globe perceived effects which will be assessed 5 minutes, 2 and 6 weeks following injection.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8V 1C3
        • Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, McMaster University
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8V 1C3
        • HHS (Juravinski Hospital Site)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • fulfill the Grade II Quebec Task Force classification of WAD,
  • with identifiable myofascial trigger points ( which occur with or without a taut band),
  • reproduction of recognizable pain with sustained pressure ( up to 10 seconds) on trigger points
  • aged 18 to 70
  • a good understanding of informed consent and willing to attend this trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have serious injury such as fracture and internal bleeding
  • suspicion of upper cervical instability or neurological deficits
  • clinical evidence of radiculopathy
  • a history of active cancer, central nerve disorder, blood clotting disorders, needle phobia
  • anticoagulant medication user
  • previous experience with any type of needling for myofascial pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lidocaine
The treatment group will receive a 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with 1% lidocaine inserting into the site of the trigger point. Three to five points injection.
Lidocaine injection 3-5 points in experimental group( using 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with 1% lidocaine inserting into the site of the trigger point).
Active Comparator: Saline
The control group will receive a 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with saline inserting to subcutis.
The control group will receive a 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with saline inserting to subcutis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks following injection
10 cm Visual Analog Scale
2 weeks following injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cervical range of motion
Time Frame: Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
self-report neck disability
Time Frame: Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
globe perceived effects
Time Frame: Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
The Short Form-12
Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
work performance
Time Frame: Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
questionnaire
Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
pain
Time Frame: 5 minutes following injection
10 cm Visual Analog Scale
5 minutes following injection
pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks following injection
10 cm Visual Analog Scale
6 weeks following injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Joy MacDermid, Ph.D., McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Subscribe