Pre-discharge vs. Early Post-discharge Stress Testing and GRACE Score for Safe Discharge of ACS-patients With a Negative Hs-troponin T Result

May 9, 2015 updated by: Professor Hugo Katus, University Hospital Heidelberg

Role of Pre-discharge vs. Early Post-discharge Stress Testing and Implementation of the GRACE Risk Score for Safe Discharge of Patients With an ACS and a Negative High Sensitivity Troponin T Result Within 3 Hours After Presentation to a Chest Pain Unit

New high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays allow earlier detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Furthermore, elevated values were associated with an increased risk of recurrent AMI or death. Therefore, guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy in patients with elevated admission values and kinetic changes. Other criteria for an early invasive strategy include a GRACE risk score >140 points or other cardiovascular risk factors. Hs-cTn assays allow discrimination of patients at very low and high risk. Studies confirmed safety of early discharge protocols in patients with unstable angina (UAP). The aim of this study is to 1) confirm the safety of early discharge without invasive strategy in patients with UAP and to 2) review the optimal timing of stress-testing. Therefore, patients are being randomized into 2 groups with pre-discharge and early post-discharge stress-testing. Endpoints are major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 and 90 days.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • University Hospital Heidelberg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting to our emergency department ("chest pain unit") with typical angina pectoris are being screened for participation. Those meeting the inclusion criteria (typical angina pectoris, absence of symptoms since presentation, low GRACE risk score) are included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients presenting to the emergency department ("chest pain unit")
  • typical angina pectoris
  • absence of symptoms since presentation
  • at least 18 years
  • low GRACE risk score (<140 points)
  • informed consent, signed agreement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • conditions with need for immediate workup
  • mental disorders
  • dementia
  • pregnancy, breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pre-discharge stress testing
Stress-testing (e.g. treadmill exercise test, stress-echochardiography)
Post-discharge stress testing
Stress-testing (e.g. treadmill exercise test, stress-echochardiography)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular event
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular event
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evangelos Giannitsis, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Study Chair: Hugo A Katus, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UHHD-BM-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

3
Subscribe