Effects of Mental Practice in Gait of Individuals With Parkinson Disease: Randomized Clinical Trial

April 16, 2014 updated by: Ana Raquel Rodrigues Lindquist, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Immediate Effects of Mental Practice in Gait of Individuals With Parkinson Disease: Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of mental practice, associated with physical practice, on gait (cinematic parameters and mobility) in individuals with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. It is believed that familiarity with the normal gait pattern, associated with mental practice and physical practice can trigger significant changes in spatiotemporal and angular parameters that are not observed in the group not submitted to mental practice.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande do Norte
      • Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, 59078-970
        • Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

44 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the subjects should be in use of antiparkinsonian medication,
  • be between stages 2 and 3 of the Hoehn and Yahr modified scale);
  • walk without any brace or aid device, independently (scores between 3 and 5 of the Functional Ambulatory Category - FAC) for at least 10 meters
  • were not undergoing stereotactic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We excluded those who were unable or declined to complete the training protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Physical practice

Familiarization with gait cycle: Cards with pictures of an elderly person performing movements related to the adjustment of posture, gait initiation and gait phases were shown to the subjects. They should have organized them sequentially, showing that they learned gait phases.

Physical practice: is the execution of the motor action.

The control group underwent familiarization of gait phases using cards with gait phases and physical gait training.

Familiarization with gait cycle: Cards with pictures of an elderly person performing movements related to the adjustment of posture, gait initiation and gait phases were shown to the subjects. They should have organized them sequentially, showing that they learned gait phases. Then, they were submitted to a physical gait training. They underwent a single training session during 1 hour and 30 minutes and were reassessed 10 minutes and 1 day after the end of the session, in respect of the kinematic gait and mobility.

Experimental: Mental and physical practice

Familiarization with gait cycle: Cards with pictures of an elderly person performing movements related to the adjustment of posture, gait initiation and gait phases were shown to the subjects. They should have organized them sequentially, showing that they learned gait phases.

Mental practice: is defined as motor imagery training with the aim of improving the engine performance. Is the imagination of a motor action without its physical implementation.

Physical practice: is the execution of the motor action.

The experimental group underwent familiarization of gait phases using cards with gait phases, mental practice of gait and physical gait training.

Familiarization with gait cycle: Cards with pictures of an elderly person performing movements related to the adjustment of posture, gait initiation and gait phases were shown to the subjects. They should have organized them sequentially, showing that they learned gait phases.

Then, they were submitted to a mental training of gait. They imagined the gait steps per 400 repetitions. While imagining, they verbalized the gait phases.

Finally, they were submitted to a physical gait training. They executed 400 steps.

They underwent a single training session during 1 hour and 30 minutes and were reassessed 10 minutes and 1 day after the end of the session, in respect of the kinematic gait and mobility.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Step length at 10 minutes and 1 day
Time Frame: Three observetions were done. At baseline, 10 minutes and 1 day after intervention.
Three observetions were done. At baseline, 10 minutes and 1 day after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Double Limb Support Time at 10 minutes and 1 day
Time Frame: Three observetions were done. At baseline, 10 minutes and 1 day after intervention.
Double Limb Support Time is the period when both feet are on the ground at the same time. The first period of double limb support begins at initial contact, and lasts, in healthy people, 10 to 12 percent of the cycle. The second period of double limb support occurs in the final 10 to 12 percent of stance phase. As the stance limb prepares to leave the ground, the opposite limb contacts the ground and accepts the body's weight. The two periods of double limb support account for 20 to 24 percent of the gait cycle's total duration. In people with Parkinson disease, this period lasts longer.
Three observetions were done. At baseline, 10 minutes and 1 day after intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorenna M. de Melo Santiago, Master, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Physical practice

3
Subscribe