Efficacy and Tolerability of Nolotil i.v. vs. Placebo i.v. in the Prevention of Postoperative Pain in Children Undergoing Minor Surgery

July 9, 2014 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Randomized, Double Blind, Comparative Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Nolotil i.v. vs. Placebo i.v. in the Prevention of Postoperative Pain in Children of 6 and 11 Years Old Undergoing Minor Surgery

Study to assess the analgesic efficacy in the prevention of postoperative pain in children undergoing minor surgery (herniorraphy, tonsillectomy) and to assess the tolerability of Metamizol in this group of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children of either sex between 6 and 11 years of age
  • Patients undergoing routine inguinal hernia repair or tonsillectomy
  • Written informed consents by the guardian, according to the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and current legislation
  • The ability of the patient to understand and carry out the visual analogue scale assessments
  • Patients with a physical status American Society of Anesthesiologist I or II class

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The use of any drug with analgesic properties in the 24 hours prior to the administration of the study drug
  • Surgery with a foreseen duration over 60 minutes
  • Patients with a nutritional index of less than 90 or greater than 120
  • Patients with a body mass index which was not between the 3rd centile and the 97th centile for age
  • Patients with any illness or malformation (except hernia) which, in the doctor's opinion, contraindicated the use of metamizol (aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis of a toxicological etiology, severe renal disease, etc.)
  • Patients who have received in the previous 7 days or need currently anticoagulant treatment
  • Significant allergy or known hypersensitivity to metamizol, its excipients and/or to other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs
  • Patients in whom the anesthetic regimen required by the protocol cannot be used
  • Patients who have participated in another clinical trial in the past four weeks or are currently participating in another clinical trial
  • Patients with any psychological disturbance which, in the investigator's opinion makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Experimental: Magnesium metamizol
Other Names:
  • Nolotil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of children requiring rescue medication
Time Frame: up to 4 hours after drug administration
up to 4 hours after drug administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time from drug administration, end of surgery and first patient's awake to the administration of rescue medication
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Percentage of children who require rescue medication
Time Frame: up to 2 hours after drug administration
up to 2 hours after drug administration
Evaluation of the pain intensity by the patient by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Evaluation of the pain intensity by the patient by means of a four points Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Assessment of the state of the patient by the guardian by means of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) test
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Assessment of the partial efficacy by the investigator by means of a four points VRS
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Assessment of the total efficacy by the investigator by means of a four points VRS
Time Frame: after 4 hours
after 4 hours
Number of patients with adverse events (AE)
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Number of withdrawals due to AEs
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
up to 4 hours
Assessment of the total tolerability of the assigned treatment by the investigator by means of a four points VRS
Time Frame: after 4 hours
after 4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe