A Prospective Study Comparing the Success Rate of Injection of (DefluxR) Versus (VantrisR) for VUR in Children

October 21, 2014 updated by: Rabin Medical Center

A Prospective Study Comparing the Success Rate of Injection of Dextranomer /Hyaluronic Acid (DefluxR) Versus Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR) for Treatment of Bilateral Similar Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urologic diagnosis in neonates estimated at 1% of newborns, and 30-45% of the children who present with urinary tract infection (1).

Optional treatments of children with VUR include conservative therapy with or without prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open surgery.

In an endoscopic technique, the injecting needle is inserted through the working channel of the cystoscope. The procedure is relatively short and is performed as out-patient surgery.

In 2000, Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (DefluxR) was approved by the FDA, and subsequently has become the treatment of choice in VUR grades 2-4.

In 2004, the hydrodistention-implantation technique (HIT) was introduced by Kirsch. HIT involves the use of a pressurized stream of fluid directed into the ureter to aid visualization, and injection into the submucosa within the ureteric tunnel to improve coaptation of the ureter (3).

One of the disadvantages attributed to Deflux is the loss of 20% of the injected material over time (a result of absorption of the hyaluronic acid), which may explain the lower success rate of the endoscopic treatment of VUR compared with open surgery.

In 2005, Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR), a non- absorbable chemical preparation was introduced for endoscopic treatment of VUR, aiming to improve on the results of Deflux by preventing volume loss. Preliminary results of a three year follow-up using Vantris have shown high a level of reflux resolution(4).

The aim of the current study is to compare the rate of resolution of the VUR using Deflux versus Vantris in bilateral VUR

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urologic diagnosis in neonates estimated at 1% of newborns, and 30-45% of the children who present with urinary tract infection (1).

Optional treatments of children with VUR include conservative therapy with or without prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open surgery.

The first endoscopic treatment was presented in 1981 by Matouschek, who injected Teflon into the submucosa of the ureteral orifice, at the six o'clock position (STING). In this technique, the injecting needle is inserted through the working channel of the cystoscope. The procedure is relatively short and is performed as out-patient surgery.

In 2000, Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (DefluxR) was approved by the FDA, and subsequently has become the treatment of choice in VUR grades 2-4.

In 2004, the hydrodistention-implantation technique (HIT) was introduced by Kirsch. HIT involves the use of a pressurized stream of fluid directed into the ureter to aid visualization, and injection into the submucosa within the ureteric tunnel to improve coaptation of the ureter (3).

A review of Deflux therapy for VUR in 63 studies, including 8101 ureters, found a success rate of 51%-79% depending on VUR grade. (grade 1,2 79%, grade 3 72%, grade 4 63%, grade 5 51%) (2).

One of the disadvantages attributed to Deflux is the loss of 20% of the injected material over time (a result of absorption of the hyaluronic acid), which may explain the lower success rate of the endoscopic treatment of VUR compared with open surgery.

In 2005, Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR), a non- absorbable chemical preparation was introduced for endoscopic treatment of VUR, aiming to improve on the results of Deflux by preventing volume loss. Preliminary results of a three year follow-up using Vantris have shown high a level of reflux resolution(4).

The aim of the current study is to compare the rate of resolution of the VUR using Deflux versus Vantris in bilateral VUR

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Petach Tikva, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Schneider Medical Center of Israel
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Ben-Meir, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral VUR of the same grade

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to apply the same technique on both ureteral orifices

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Deflux
In each patient, Deflux will be injected into one of the ureteral orifices using the the HIT technique.
Deflux will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one ureteral orifice and Vantris to the other side). The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING
Other Names:
  • Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid
Active Comparator: Vantris
Vantris will be injected into the other ureteral orifice using the same technique and the same amount of implant.
vantris will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one Vantris to the other side). The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING
Other Names:
  • Polyacrylate Polyalcohol copolymer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
rate of resolution of VUR using Vantris vs.Deflux
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Ben-Meir, MD, Investigator

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

Clinical Trials on Deflux

3
Subscribe