- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02271035
A Prospective Study Comparing the Success Rate of Injection of (DefluxR) Versus (VantrisR) for VUR in Children
A Prospective Study Comparing the Success Rate of Injection of Dextranomer /Hyaluronic Acid (DefluxR) Versus Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR) for Treatment of Bilateral Similar Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urologic diagnosis in neonates estimated at 1% of newborns, and 30-45% of the children who present with urinary tract infection (1).
Optional treatments of children with VUR include conservative therapy with or without prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open surgery.
In an endoscopic technique, the injecting needle is inserted through the working channel of the cystoscope. The procedure is relatively short and is performed as out-patient surgery.
In 2000, Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (DefluxR) was approved by the FDA, and subsequently has become the treatment of choice in VUR grades 2-4.
In 2004, the hydrodistention-implantation technique (HIT) was introduced by Kirsch. HIT involves the use of a pressurized stream of fluid directed into the ureter to aid visualization, and injection into the submucosa within the ureteric tunnel to improve coaptation of the ureter (3).
One of the disadvantages attributed to Deflux is the loss of 20% of the injected material over time (a result of absorption of the hyaluronic acid), which may explain the lower success rate of the endoscopic treatment of VUR compared with open surgery.
In 2005, Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR), a non- absorbable chemical preparation was introduced for endoscopic treatment of VUR, aiming to improve on the results of Deflux by preventing volume loss. Preliminary results of a three year follow-up using Vantris have shown high a level of reflux resolution(4).
The aim of the current study is to compare the rate of resolution of the VUR using Deflux versus Vantris in bilateral VUR
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urologic diagnosis in neonates estimated at 1% of newborns, and 30-45% of the children who present with urinary tract infection (1).
Optional treatments of children with VUR include conservative therapy with or without prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open surgery.
The first endoscopic treatment was presented in 1981 by Matouschek, who injected Teflon into the submucosa of the ureteral orifice, at the six o'clock position (STING). In this technique, the injecting needle is inserted through the working channel of the cystoscope. The procedure is relatively short and is performed as out-patient surgery.
In 2000, Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (DefluxR) was approved by the FDA, and subsequently has become the treatment of choice in VUR grades 2-4.
In 2004, the hydrodistention-implantation technique (HIT) was introduced by Kirsch. HIT involves the use of a pressurized stream of fluid directed into the ureter to aid visualization, and injection into the submucosa within the ureteric tunnel to improve coaptation of the ureter (3).
A review of Deflux therapy for VUR in 63 studies, including 8101 ureters, found a success rate of 51%-79% depending on VUR grade. (grade 1,2 79%, grade 3 72%, grade 4 63%, grade 5 51%) (2).
One of the disadvantages attributed to Deflux is the loss of 20% of the injected material over time (a result of absorption of the hyaluronic acid), which may explain the lower success rate of the endoscopic treatment of VUR compared with open surgery.
In 2005, Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR), a non- absorbable chemical preparation was introduced for endoscopic treatment of VUR, aiming to improve on the results of Deflux by preventing volume loss. Preliminary results of a three year follow-up using Vantris have shown high a level of reflux resolution(4).
The aim of the current study is to compare the rate of resolution of the VUR using Deflux versus Vantris in bilateral VUR
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: David Ben-Meir, MD
- Phone Number: 97239253118
- Email: davidbm@clalit.org.il
Study Locations
-
-
-
Petach Tikva, Israel
- Recruiting
- Schneider Medical Center of Israel
-
Contact:
- David Ben-Meir, MD
- Phone Number: 97239253347
- Email: davidbm@clalit.org.il
-
Principal Investigator:
- David Ben-Meir, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral VUR of the same grade
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to apply the same technique on both ureteral orifices
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Deflux
In each patient, Deflux will be injected into one of the ureteral orifices using the the HIT technique.
|
Deflux will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one ureteral orifice and Vantris to the other side).
The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Vantris
Vantris will be injected into the other ureteral orifice using the same technique and the same amount of implant.
|
vantris will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one Vantris to the other side).
The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
rate of resolution of VUR using Vantris vs.Deflux
Time Frame: 2 years
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Ben-Meir, MD, Investigator
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Rabin Medical Center
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
-
Stanford UniversityLucile Packard Children's HospitalCompleted
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedVesicoureteral Reflux | Nipple UreteroneocystostomyTurkey
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityTerminatedVesicoureteral RefluxUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineSociety of Pediatric UrologyTerminatedVesicoureteral RefluxUnited States
-
Kassa DargeCompletedVesico-Ureteral RefluxUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityWithdrawn
-
Balgrist University HospitalCompletedSpinal Cord Injury | Vesico-ureteral RefluxSwitzerland
-
University of AlbertaCanadian Urological AssociationWithdrawn
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedVesicoureteral RefluxUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedVesicoureteral RefluxKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Deflux
-
South Shore HospitalQ-Med Scandinavia, Inc.Terminated
-
Ahn-Gook Pharmaceuticals Co.,LtdCompletedGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseKorea, Republic of