Altis® 522 Trial - Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

November 29, 2023 updated by: Coloplast A/S

A Post-Market Evaluation of the Altis® Single Incision Sling System Versus Transobturator or Retropubic Mesh Sling in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

The aim of this postmarket study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the Altis Single Incision Sling (SIS) to an FDA cleared transobturator and/or retropubic sling through 36 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, post-market, multi-center, cohort assessment comparing Altis SIS (n=178) and transobturator and/or retropubic slings (n=178) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence at up to 40 U.S. and international sites. Subjects will be followed for a total of 36 months with scheduled visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. The study population will consist of adult female subjects with stress urinary incontinence who are clinically indicated for surgical intervention with a mesh sling.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

416

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5N4
        • CHUS Hopital Fleurimont
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • Pelvic Solutions Center
    • Florida
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States, 33016
        • Urology Specialists, LLC
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
        • Rosemark Women Care Specialists
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825
        • Women's Health Advantage
    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02138
        • Boston Urogynecology Associates
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
        • Baystate Health System
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
        • Adult and Pediatric Urology & Urogynecology
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89102
        • University of Nevada
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Albany Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27511
        • Associated Urologists of North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • Novant Health
      • Gastonia, North Carolina, United States, 28054
        • Carolina Urology Partners
      • Hamlet, North Carolina, United States, 28345
        • FirstHealth Urogynecology
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27612
        • Associated Urologists of North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Lyndhurst Clinical Research
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44313
        • Akron Urogynecology Associates
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Zanesville, Ohio, United States, 43701
        • Genesis Healthcare
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18103
        • The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
      • North Wales, Pennsylvania, United States, 19454
        • Institute of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery
    • South Carolina
      • West Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29169
        • Lexington Urology
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Sanford Health
    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23456
        • The Group for Women

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be selected from urology or urogynecology specialties.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is female and at least 18 years of age.
  • The subject is able and willing to complete all procedures and follow-up visits indicated in this protocol.
  • The subject has confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through cough stress test or urodynamics.
  • The subject has failed two non-invasive incontinence therapies (such as Kegel exercise, behavior modification, pad use, biofeedback, etc.) for > 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has an active urogenital infection or active skin infection in region of surgery.
  • The subject has confirmed Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) of Stage 2 or higher as determined by POP-Q prolapse grading.
  • The subject is having a concomitant pelvic floor procedure.
  • The subject has incontinence due to neurogenic causes (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord/brain injury, cerebrovascular accident, detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia, Parkinson's disease, or similar conditions).
  • The subject had a prior surgical stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment.
  • The subject has undergone radiation or brachy therapy to treat pelvic cancer.
  • The subject has urge predominant incontinence by MESA assessment.
  • The subject has an atonic bladder or post void residual (PVR) above 100 cc on ≥ 2 occasions.
  • The subject is pregnant and/or is planning to get pregnant in the future.
  • The subject has a contraindication to the surgical procedure or the product Instructions for Use (IFU).
  • The subject is enrolled in a concurrent clinical trial of any treatment (drug or device) that could affect continence function, without the sponsors approval.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Altis arm
Subjects will have an Altis sling placed to treat stress urinary incontinence.
Altis is a minimally invasive, adjustable incontinence sling that is placed through a single incision in the vaginal wall and anchored inside the body. The sling has an integrated tensioning system eliminating the need for additional skin exits.
Comparator arm
Subjects will have a transobturator or retropubic sling placed to treat stress urinary incontinence.
Both transobturator and retropubic slings are a hammock-like mesh placed underneath the urethra to provide support. A single incision is made in the vaginal wall and two incisions in the abdomen. Tensioning of the sling is achieved by pulling the sling through the abdominal incisions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months
Observed effectiveness, defined as a reduction from baseline in 24 hour pad weight of at least 50% at 6 months.
6 months
Primary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: 36 months
Observed device and/or procedure-related serious adverse events through 36 months.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observed rates for the following: organ perforation, bleeding, mesh exposure in the vagina, mesh erosion into the bladder, pelvic pain, infection, de novo dyspareunia, urinary retention, recurrent incontinence, other urinary or neuromuscular problems
Time Frame: 36 months
To demonstrate that the rate of device and/or procedure related adverse events defined as organ perforation, bleeding, mesh exposure in the vagina, mesh erosion into the bladder, pelvic pain, infection, de novo dyspareunia, urinary retention, recurrent incontinence, other urinary problems and neuromuscular problems associated with use of Altis SIS is non-inferior compared to the rate associated with use of transobturator and/or retropubic slings at 36 months.
36 months
Observed effectiveness, defined as a reduction from baseline in 24 hour pad weight of at least 50%.
Time Frame: 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
To demonstrate a reduction from baseline in 24 hour pad weight of at least 50%.
12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Quality of Life assessment
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Measured through the following questionnaires: Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7), Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain)
6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Observed adverse events of the index procedure
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
To assess the rates, severity, and relatedness of all observed adverse events (including mesh exposure and erosion) associated with both study groups at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months.
6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Observed revision/re-surgery
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
To assess the rates all revisions/re-surgeries observed associated with both study groups at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months.
6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
Observed effectiveness for subjects considered dry (pad weight less than or equal to 4.0 grams)
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
To assess the effectiveness for subjects considered dry (pad weight less than or equal to 4.0 grams)
6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ty Erickson, MD, Rosemark WomenCare Specialists

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

January 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe