Transpulmonary Thermodilution Using an Implented Central Venous Access Port (ThermoD-PAC)

Measurement of Cardiac Index by Transpulmonary Thermodilution Using an Implanted Central Venous Access Port: a Prospective Study in Patients Scheduled for Oncologic High-risk Surgery

Perioperative hemodynamic optimization requires monitoring adapted to the risks of the surgery and the patient. The investigators currently use a local hemodynamic protocol based on the data of the literature. According to this protocol, specific patients may require cardiac index and central venous oxygen saturation monitoring. the investigators chose to monitor the cardiac index (CI) with the transpulmonary thermodilution technique (TPTD) (PiCCO, Pulsion Medical System, Munich, Allemagne). The technique is based on the injection of a cooled bolus of saline into a central vein with a central venous catheter (CVC). The variation of temperature is measured with an arterial femoral catheter and allows the assessment of the cardiac output according to Stewart-Hamilton's theory. Many studies showed the reliability of this technique (Bein J Cardio Thorac Vasc Anesth 2004, Buhre Cardio thorac vasc anesth 1999, Felbinger J Clin ANesth 2005, Felbinger TW J Clin Anetsh 2002, Godie O Ann Thorac Surg 1999).

In our institute, most of the patients are fitted with a port for chemotherapy or parenteral nutrition. When PiCCO monitoring is necessary, a central venous catheter is inserted on the opposite side of the permanent implantable venous port. Indeed, insertion of the CVC can be more difficult because of the port. It may be interesting to use the port for TPTD in order to avoid the insertion of a new CVC. This would be possible only if the measurement of CI by the port was as reliable as the classical measurement with a CVC.

The aim of this study was to assess whether measurement of the CI by TPTD was possible and reliable via the port. The investigators conducted a prospective study comparing the measurement of the CI by TPTD before and after fluid challenge via the port versus the CVC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Val de Marne
      • Villejuif, Val de Marne, France, 94805
        • Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for onoclogic hish-risk surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of port
  • scheduled surgery with perioperative optimization requirement according to the local hemodynamic protocol
  • oral consent of the patient after oral and written information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age inferior to 18
  • Contraindication or failure to the insertion of the CVC
  • Contraindication to the use of the port : local or general infection suspected or proved, absence of blood backflow

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the measurement of cardiac index with the transpulmonary thermodilution technique
Time Frame: At inclusion
During surgery
At inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandre Eghiain, MD, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-A00003-40
  • 2012/1386 (Other Identifier: CSET number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe