Improving Patient Decisions About Bariatric Surgery (PCORI)

September 25, 2018 updated by: Amir Ghaferi, University of Michigan

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)- Improving Patient Decisions About Bariatric Surgery

At least 15 million Americans are morbidly obese, or more than 100 pounds overweight. Medical treatments including drugs and behavior modification have proven ineffective in producing significant and lasting weight loss in this group. While bariatric surgery is extremely effective for most patients, it also carries risks for both short and long-term complications. There are currently four different types of bariatric surgery available and the risks and benefits of these procedures vary widely and are strongly affected by patient and clinical characteristics.

Decision making under these circumstances should reflect informed patient's values and preferences regarding these trade-offs. Instead, the choice of bariatric procedure is more often driven by the beliefs and experiences of the bariatric surgeon that a patient happens to see. Variability in the type of surgery recommended to patients likely results from some combination of surgeons' subjective opinions and personal experiences with regard to the risks and benefits of the treatment options and delegated decision making on the part of patients.

The goals of this research proposal are to develop, implement, and evaluate an informed decision support tool for treatment of morbid obesity. This project will be conducted within the context of the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (MBSC), which is a statewide clinical registry and quality improvement program that has the participation of virtually every bariatric surgeon and program in the state of Michigan. The MBSC registry now includes externally audited clinical data for more than 80,000 consecutive bariatric surgery patients. MBSC outcome measures include complications occurring within 30 days as well as weight loss, comorbidity resolution, quality of life and satisfaction at 1, 2, and 3 years after bariatric surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Our specific aims are:

  1. To develop a web-based interactive decision support tool to incorporate tailored information regarding risks and benefits of the treatment options (from regression-based prediction models derived on the 35,000 patients already in the MBSC registry) with information regarding other salient attributes of the treatment options (derived from focus groups and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders including bariatric surgery patients, bariatric program staff, and surgeons).
  2. To perform a quasi-experimental study comparing the decision support tool with usual care to determine its effects on patient decisions (treatment choice, knowledge, treatment-preference concordance, and decisional conflict) and on patient outcomes including weight loss, patient satisfaction, and improvements in quality of life after surgery.

This research is closely aligned with the goals of PCORI and will have direct impacts on patients and caregivers by providing information that is required to improve healthcare decision-making for this prevalent, damaging, and costly condition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients considering undergoing bariatric surgery in the state of Michigan who are 18 or older.
  • All patients, regardless of gender or racial/ethnic background, will be recruited to participate in the study in the same way.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Potential bariatric surgery patients who receive both the baseline questionnaire and follow-up questionnaire.
Other: Decision Aid
Potential bariatric surgery patients who receive both the baseline questionnaire decision aid/conjoint analysis and follow-up questionnaire.
Decision aid tool about weight loss treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision outcome by Decider Guider Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
Decisional measures
24 months
Patient specific outcome by Decider Guider Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Knowledge, as measured by a follow-up Decider Guider questionnaire to test knowledge
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Preferences as measured by Decider Guider Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Quality of Life as measured by Decider Guider Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Comorbidity Resolution as measured by Decider Guider Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Patient Satisfaction as measured by Decider Guider Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00083670

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Morbid Obesity

Clinical Trials on Decider Guider: Weight Loss

3
Subscribe