Influence of Exercise, Weight Loss, and Exercise Plus Weight Loss on Sleep Apnea

April 9, 2021 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent among Veterans, and is associated with significant mortality and multiple morbidities. Available treatments have had limited effectiveness in treating OSA and alleviating associated morbidity. The investigators' previous research found a reduction in OSA severity of approximately 25% following modest exercise training. That this effect occurred independent of weight loss raises the exciting possibility that exercise combined with weight loss could reduce OSA by at least 50% and have unique health benefits for OSA patients. Following screening and baseline assessments, 90 overweight Veterans ages 18-60 years with OSA will be randomized to one of three 16-week treatments: (1) exercise training; (2) 10 % weight loss; and 3) exercise + weight loss. Changes in OSA and related morbidity will be compared between treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Approximately 15-20% of adults have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and evidence indicates that the prevalence of OSA is perhaps twice as high among Veterans. OSA has been clearly linked to increased mortality and multiple morbidities, and undoubtedly contributes to the high prevalence of health problems among Veterans. Current treatments for OSA are not well tolerated, often have limited efficacy, and often do not result in improvements in health. The investigators' recent research demonstrated that 12 weeks of moderate exercise training elicited a reduction of OSA of ~25%, as well as significant improvement in mood, fatigue, quality of life, and cardiovascular health. Interestingly, as with other health benefits of exercise, the investigators' research is consistent with other research showing that exercise can reduce OSA independent of changes in body weight. These studies raise the exciting possibility that exercise training combined with modest weight loss could elicit a chronic reduction in OSA of 50% or more.

Objectives: The investigators' Objective is to compare the effects of 16 weeks of exercise training alone, weight loss alone, and exercise + weight loss on OSA severity and associated morbidity.

Methods: Following extensive screening and baseline assessment, N=90 overweight/obese Veterans (ages 18-60 years) with mild to severe OSA will be randomized to one of three 16-week treatments. (1) Exercise Alone (n=30) will involve training 4 days per week under supervision of a clinical exercise physiologist. It will include aerobic exercise (treadmill, cycling, elliptical) that will gradually increase to 30-45 min on 4 days/wk, as well as resistance exercise (15 min) on 2 days/week. (2) Weight Loss Alone (n=30) will involve a structured meal plan (including some meal replacement with shakes or bars), and weekly counseling designed to elicit a reduction in body weight of 10%. (3) Exercise + Weight Loss (n=30) will involve the same exercise and weight loss interventions as in the other treatments. Outside of the interventions, participants will be asked to maintain their usual exercise and diet habits, as verified, respectively, with actigraphic recording and a 24-hr food recall. Before and after the treatments, participants will undergo 5 days/nights of home-based actigraphic and diary-assessed sleep, and one night of laboratory polysomnographic recording of sleep, including OSA severity. Comorbidity measures will include pre- to post-treatment changes in blood pressure, glucose, insulin, lipids, hemoglobin a1c, body weight/composition, and inflammation (e.g., CRP, IL-6). Also measured will be monthly changes in self-reports of sleep quality, functional outcomes of sleepiness (FOSQ), and snoring symptoms. A 3-month follow-up will include home assessment of OSA, as well as sleep quality, FOSQ, and snoring. Mediation analysis will explore whether improvements in OSA are mediated by changes in percent of deep sleep, body weight, trunk body fat percent, trunk total mass, respiratory muscle strength, and upper airway obstruction assessed in the laboratory.

Implications for Future Research. Demonstration of a reduction of OSA by 50% would result in extensive subsequent studies. These would likely include studies of dose-response effects; comparisons of different modes of exercise; studies of the feasibility of telemedicine approaches to the interventions; comparative efficacy studies vs. PAP; further mechanistic studies, for example, of upper airway collapsibility and composition (e.g, via MRI); and studies of other positive health outcomes, such as extensive heart imaging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
        • Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran
  • 18-65 years of age
  • Moderate-severity OSA [[Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 15 at screening]
  • Overweight/obese
  • Physically inactive
  • BMI 28
  • Sedentary lifestyle (planned activity for purpose of health < 2 days/week)
  • Stable weight Not engaged in weight loss study or program
  • Stable medications Medications for thyroid, cholesterol, blood pressure, and other conditions at same dose for 2 months
  • Capable of signing consent and willing to provide informed consent and accept randomization assignment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current OSA treatment Current use of continuous positive airway pressure (PAP), dental devices, etc. for OSA treatment. Past PAP or oral appliances are not exclusions if discontinued 2 months before study
  • Significant disease: known or signs/symptoms of cardiovascular, metabolic, or pulmonary disease
  • Uncontrolled hypertension: Blood pressure > 159/99 mmHg
  • Unable to exercise: musculoskeletal, orthopedic, neuromuscular, or other conditions that do not allow exercise or where exercise is contraindicated
  • Any accident attributable to sleepiness in previous 3 years
  • Current pregnancy/planning to become pregnant
  • Clinically judged unsuitable as evaluated by supervising medical physician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise
16 week intervention, building up to 30-45 minutes of aerobic exercise 4 days per week, and 15 min of resistance exercise 2 days per week
16 weeks. 4 days per week of aerobic exercise; 45 min for 2 days and for 30 min for two days. 2 days per week of resistance exercise for 15 min (coinciding with the days involving 30 min of aerobic exercise)
Experimental: Weight Loss
16 week intervention with a goal weight loss of 10%, accomplished with caloric and fat restriction, weekly sessions with a nutritionist, and some meal replacement
16 week. the goal is 10% weight loss.
Experimental: Exercise + Weight Loss
Combined components of the exercise and weight loss treatments
Combined exercise and weight loss components of the other arms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Common criterion for obstructive sleep apnea: number of apnea and hypopnea episodes per hour of sleep. Baseline-end - positive value indicates a reduction.
Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Outcomes of Sleepiness Questionnaire (FOSQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)

Measures impairments in functioning associated with sleepiness. Baseline minus end of study value. Positive value indicates improvement; negative value indicates worsening.

Minimum score on scale: 0 Maximum score: 120

Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Snoring Severity Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)

Questionnaire that measures severity of snoring with a questionnaire. A positive value indicates improvement; a negative value indicates worsening.

Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 9

Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)

Commonly used metric of sleep quality. Baseline minus end of study. Positive value indicates improvement.

Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 21

Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Blood pressure
Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Body Weight
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Fasting body weight. Weight change (kg) beginning to end of study (positive valuate = decrease)
Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Percent Body Fat Assessed With Dual-energy X-reay Absorptiometry (DEXA)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Percent body fat assessed with DEXA. Change in percent body fat - positive value represents a decrease.
Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)
Measure of inflammation
Change from baseline to the end of the study (16-week intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shawn D. Youngstedt, PhD, Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overweight

Clinical Trials on Exercise

3
Subscribe