Teres Major Muscle and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Effectiveness of Teres Major Muscle Specific Treatment in Patients Diagnosed With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

There is not a clear understanding of the origin of symptoms perceived by patients with impingement of the soft tissue structures of the subacromial space. Tendinopathy, tendon rupture or other pathologies, are present in asymptomatic subjects and subjects with symptoms and structural integrity can also be found.

Patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome frequently have myofascial trigger points in the teres major muscle. Travell and Simons reported that the symptoms caused by trigger points in this muscle are similar to those experienced by patients diagnosed with impingement syndrome, but a literature search provides few results regarding relationship between subacromial impingement syndrome and presence of myofascial trigger points in the teres major muscle.

This study aims to provide evidence of the results that can be obtained with a specific approach of teres mayor muscle by two manual techniques, Trigger Point Pressure Release and Diacutaneous Fibrolysis, in subjects with subacromial impingement syndrome, a condition that still representing both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Secondary objective is to compare the outcomes between both techniques to select for each patient the most appropriate to their needs and characteristics.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Cornellà de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08840
        • Recruiting
        • Catalan Health Institut. Sant Ildefons Rehabilitation Service
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years and over
  • Clinical diagnosis of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.
  • Detectable trigger points in teres major muscle.
  • Sign informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diacutaneous Fibrolysis contraindications
  • Previous shoulder surgery (<1year)
  • Language barriers or cognitive issues that limit their ability to provide informed consent and participate in research.
  • Patients with a pending litigation or court claim.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fibrolysis Group
Actual Diacutaneous Fibrolysis and protocolized physiotherapy
Applied only around teres major muscle.
Exercises, TENS and cryotherapy
Experimental: Pressure Group
Trigger Point Pressure Release and protocolized physiotherapy
Exercises, TENS and cryotherapy
Applied only in teres major muscle trigger points.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Protocolized physiotherapy
Exercises, TENS and cryotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain intensity (Using a VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 weeks.
Using a VAS
Change from baseline to 3 weeks.
Change in Functional capacity (Abbreviated Constant-Murley score)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 weeks.
Abbreviated Constant-Murley score
Change from baseline to 3 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Active Range of Motion
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 weeks.
Flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation
Change from baseline to 3 weeks.
Patient perception of change (Global Rating of Change scale)
Time Frame: 3 weeks after recruitment
Global Rating of Change scale
3 weeks after recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martín Barra, IDIAP Jordi Gol

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe