Full-Endoscopic vs Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Herniated Disc

August 3, 2018 updated by: Yale University

Full-Endoscopic vs Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Herniated Disc: A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of full endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar decompression for the treatment of lumbar herniated discs in which the patient's leg pain is greater than back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be performed utilizing a prospective multi-center randomized model. Approximately 7 centers will be included in the study as listed above. Patients will be informed of clinical trial and asked if they would like to participate. Patients are informed that participation is optional. Patients may withdraw from study any time prior to or after surgery. Patients will be randomized 2:1 ratio endoscopic:open surgery. Both the endoscopic and open surgical techniques are utilized in standard of care. If a subject requires an open surgery approach (based on the surgeons assessment at the time of surgery pre or post incision) after they are randomized to the endoscopic arm, they will be switched to the open arm and included in the open crossover arm of the study.

Study procedures will occur at the following time points; Pre-op, 6 wk, 3 mon, 6 mon, 1 yr and 2 yr follow-up.Subjects will complete questionnaires that assess pain level and location, functional capacity, work and health status, medication usage and duration of symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale New Haven Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient equal to or greater than 18 years old.
  2. Patients with single level para-central herniated discs from L1-S1.
  3. VAS (Visual Analog Scale) leg > 40 mm.
  4. Leg pain must be greater than back pain.
  5. Minimum 6 weeks conservative treatment unless motor strength U< U4/5 and or deteriorating neurologic function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lateral/subarticular, far lateral disc herniations
  2. Multi-focal (multi modal) disc herniations
  3. Symptomatic multiple level disc herniations
  4. Active infection either spinal or otherwise
  5. Prior history of lumbar spinal infection at any level
  6. Spinal tumor in lumbar region
  7. Dynamic (any grade) or fixed spondylolisthesis more than 3mm
  8. Disc extrusion that is more superior than most inferior aspect of superior pedicle above index disc level
  9. Disc extrusion that is more inferior than the middle aspect of inferior pedicle below the index disc level
  10. Presence of unilateral or bilateral pars inter articularis defects (spondylolysis)
  11. Disc herniation which is significantly calcified
  12. Contra-lateral leg pain U>40 mm
  13. History of peripheral diabetic neuropathy
  14. Significant central stenosis with history of neurogenic claudication
  15. Pregnancy
  16. Facet cyst on symptomatic side
  17. Cauda Equina syndrome past or present
  18. Patients cannot have had prior lumbar surgery including IDET (Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy) or other percutaneous surgical procedures.
  19. Significant vascular claudication
  20. History of radiation to the spinal column
  21. History of malignancy of any type within 2 years of consideration of enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Endoscopic Discectomy
Randomized to Endoscopic Discectomy Lumbar discectomy Endoscopic Intervention type is lumbar endoscopic surgery- no device or drug
Endoscopic Discectomy
Other Names:
  • (Intervention type is lumbar endoscopic surgery- no device or drug
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Open Discectomy
Randomized to Open Discectomy Lumbar discectomy Open Intervention type is lumbar open surgery- no device or drug
Open Discectomy
Other Names:
  • Intervention type is lumbar Open surgery- no device or drug
OTHER: Open Discectomy-Cross Over Arm
Randomized to Endoscopic Discectomy Cross over to lumbar discectomy open based on surgeons assessment pre or post incision Intervention type is lumbar open surgery- no device or drug
Open Discectomy
Other Names:
  • Intervention type is lumbar Open surgery- no device or drug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Leg pain as assessed by VAS score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on Lumbar discectomy Endoscopic

3
Subscribe