Safety and Effectiveness of Drug up Titration by Nurses Specialized in Heart Failure (HF) Patients (ETIFIC)

November 26, 2020 updated by: Maria Juana Oyanguren Artola, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
Introduction: Heart Failure (HF) generates multiple hospital admissions and mortality, which are reduced with the administration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) drugs (Level of Evidence A). The effect is dose-dependent. Nevertheless, dosages are suboptimal. European Guidelines 2012 recommend close monitoring and up-titration of drugs by HF nurses. Trials are needed to evaluate their effectiveness and safety. Objective: To compare doses achieved by patients of BB, ACEI, ARB II and MRA in 4 months ( % relative to target doses) in the intervention group (HF nurse) and in the control group ( cardiologist), adverse events, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA), 6 min. walking test, quality of life, Nt-proBNP, readmissions and mortality. Hypothesis: Non-inferiority. Design: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. New ("de novo") HF patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, NYHA II-III, without contraindications to BB of 17 Spanish hospitals will be included. Intervention: The cardiologist prescribes drugs and, driven by protocol, the HF nurse implements the up-titration. In the control group doses are decided by the cardiologist clinical support and education being provided by nurses. Variables: age, sex, education, psycho-social level, Cardio Vascular Risk Factors (CVRF), NYHA, LVEF, ischemic cardiopathy., N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), 6min. walking test, Creatinine/Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Potassium (K), haemoglobin, Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR), mg./drug, European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ), European Quality of life Scale (EQ-5D). Expected Results: If our hypothesis were confirmed, evidence would be provided on the effectiveness of this healthcare management, that could be economically evaluated in future studies. A qualitative study also will be undertaken to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

No apply

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bizkaia
      • Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain, 48960
        • Hospital de usansolo-Galdakao

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with "de novo" heart Failure and LVEF <= 40% admitted in hospital, without contraindications for BB prescription with cardiologist up-titration prescription and without having achieved BB target dose previous discharge and signing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for BB.
  • Living in a nursing home.
  • Life expectancy < 6 months.
  • Unable to self-care or mental disease without caregiver.
  • Unable to weight
  • Without phone
  • Unable to go to clinic visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration
Active Comparator:Cardiologist decides dosage with nursing clinical and educational support.
Up-titration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) in Heart Failure "De Novo" patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤ 40%, following a protocol based on 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) guidelines. Drugs are prescribed and titrated by the cardiologist.
Experimental: HF nurse up-titration
Intervention: The cardiologist prescribes drugs and, driven by protocol, the HF nurse implements the up-titration.
Up-titration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) in Heart Failure "De Novo" patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤ 40%, following a protocol based on 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) guidelines with cardiologist prescription and support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 months
BB mean Relative dose is the mean dose of betablockers achieved 4 months after starting titration, relative to target dose ( %) , which is the target dose of european heart failure guidelines for BB.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Worsening Renal Function (From Baseline to 4th Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of participants with worsening renal function during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to the titration process (Creatinine increase >50% baseline creatinine or creatinine>3mg/dl, or Estimated Glomerular Filtration<25 ml/min/1.73 m2)
4 months
Number of Participants With Potassium (K) ≥5.5 Meq/l (From Baseline to 4 Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of participants with Potassium≥ 5.5 meq/l during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to this titration process
4 months
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension (From Baseline to 4 Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
Description: Number of participants with symptomatic hypotension during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to this titration process. Symptomatic hypotension defined as symptoms such as dizziness or light headedness, associated to hypotension
4 months
Number of Participants With Heart Rate (HR) < 50 Beats Per Minute (From Baseline to 4 Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of participants with Heart Rate (HR) < 50 beats per minute during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) , which could be associated to the titration process. (with or without symptoms)
4 months
Number of Patients With Atrio Ventricular (AV) Block Due to Titration
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of patients with AV Block during the titration process, associated to the BB titration
4 months
Number of Patients With Worsening of Heart Failure Signs and Symptoms
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of patients with worsening of heart failure signs and symptoms during the titration process ( from baseline to 4 month) which could be associated to the titration process.
4 months
Number of Patients With Admissions Due to Titration
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of patients with admissions due to titration ( not due to other causes)
4 months
Number of Patients: Mortality Due to Titration
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of patients: Mortality due to titration ( not due to other causes)
4 months
Number of Paticipants With Drug Stop (Some Titration Drug Withdrawal Due to Intolerance, no Need or Change to Other Treatment)
Time Frame: 4 months
number of paticipants with drug Stop ( withdrawal) that occur during the titration process that could be due to an adverse event. ( it can be not only due to an adverse event but because there is no need of this drug or its substitution for another kind of drug)
4 months
Change in % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups) Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts.
6 months
N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide Improvement (Nt-proBNP)
Time Frame: 6 months
Nt-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) Improvement (Decrease) difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups, mean (SD)
6 months
6 Minute Walking Test
Time Frame: 6 months
6 minute walking test improvement ( change) meters.Improvement (difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups Six minute walking test. Measurement of exercise capacity is an integral element in assessment of patients with cardiopulmonary disease. It provides information regarding functional capacity, response to therapy and prognosis across a range of chronic cardiopulmonary conditions. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance (meters) an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway.
6 months
Number of Participants n(%) in New York Heart Association Functional Classification I,II,III,IV
Time Frame: 6 months

Number of participants class I-IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, based on severity of symptoms and physical activity:

NYHA I (better): No limitation of physical activity; NYHA II: Slight limitation of ordinary physical activity, breathlessness; NYHA III: marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity results in undue breathlessness, fatigue or palpitations; NYHA IV ( worse): unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.Symptoms at rest can be present. If any physical activity is undertaken discomfort is increased.

6 months
Quality of Life: MLWHFQ
Time Frame: 6 months

Quality of Life, measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Improvement (change) from baseline to 6 months.

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ). The content of this questionnaire was selected to be representative of the ways heart failure and treatments can affect the key physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life of patients with heart failure. It consist of 21-items with score 0-5. Final evaluation moves from 0 (none) to 105 (very much); a lower score means better quality of life.

6 months
European Quality of Life Scale: EuroQol- 5 Dimension Index
Time Frame: 6 months

European Quality of Life Scale: EuroQol- 5 Dimension index (Range: 1 full health-0 death). It measures health status self-reported by the patient. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into three levels: 1 no problem; 2 some or moderate problems; 3 extreme problems. The EuroQol Research Foundation converts this information into a single summary index, by applying a formula that attaches specific country values (called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The index is calculated by subtracting the mentioned weights from 1, the value for full health.

We measured the EuroQol-5D index improvement (change) from baseline to 6 months.

More information in: EQ-5D-3L-User-Guide_version-6.0 (1).pdf

6 months
Number of Patients With Admissions Due to Heart Failure (HF)
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of patients with hospital admissions due to Heart Failure. From Baseline to 6 months
6 months
Number of Patients With Deaths
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of Patients with deaths due to Cardiovascular and non cardiovascular causes
6 months
ACEI % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 Months
ACEI mean Relative dose is the mean dose of ACEI achieved 4 months after starting titration, relative to target dose (%) described in European guidelines
4 Months
ARB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 months

ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers, mean relative dose ( % to target dose). Target dose is described in European guidelines.

Measured at 4 months after starting titration.

4 months
MRA % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 months
MRA % relative dose (mean) is the mean dose achieved 4 months after starting titration with regard to target dose (%) described in european guidelines
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Juana Oyanguren, Nurse, Osakidetza-Servicio vasco de Salud

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PI14/01208

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration

Subscribe