- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02546856
Safety and Effectiveness of Drug up Titration by Nurses Specialized in Heart Failure (HF) Patients (ETIFIC)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bizkaia
-
Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain, 48960
- Hospital de usansolo-Galdakao
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with "de novo" heart Failure and LVEF <= 40% admitted in hospital, without contraindications for BB prescription with cardiologist up-titration prescription and without having achieved BB target dose previous discharge and signing informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications for BB.
- Living in a nursing home.
- Life expectancy < 6 months.
- Unable to self-care or mental disease without caregiver.
- Unable to weight
- Without phone
- Unable to go to clinic visit.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration
Active Comparator:Cardiologist decides dosage with nursing clinical and educational support.
|
Up-titration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) in Heart Failure "De Novo" patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤ 40%, following a protocol based on 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) guidelines.
Drugs are prescribed and titrated by the cardiologist.
|
|
Experimental: HF nurse up-titration
Intervention: The cardiologist prescribes drugs and, driven by protocol, the HF nurse implements the up-titration.
|
Up-titration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) in Heart Failure "De Novo" patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤ 40%, following a protocol based on 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) guidelines with cardiologist prescription and support.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
BB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 months
|
BB mean Relative dose is the mean dose of betablockers achieved 4 months after starting titration, relative to target dose ( %) , which is the target dose of european heart failure guidelines for BB.
|
4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Worsening Renal Function (From Baseline to 4th Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of participants with worsening renal function during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to the titration process (Creatinine increase >50% baseline creatinine or creatinine>3mg/dl, or Estimated Glomerular Filtration<25 ml/min/1.73
m2)
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Potassium (K) ≥5.5 Meq/l (From Baseline to 4 Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of participants with Potassium≥ 5.5 meq/l during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to this titration process
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension (From Baseline to 4 Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Description: Number of participants with symptomatic hypotension during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to this titration process.
Symptomatic hypotension defined as symptoms such as dizziness or light headedness, associated to hypotension
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Heart Rate (HR) < 50 Beats Per Minute (From Baseline to 4 Month)
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of participants with Heart Rate (HR) < 50 beats per minute during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) , which could be associated to the titration process.
(with or without symptoms)
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Patients With Atrio Ventricular (AV) Block Due to Titration
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of patients with AV Block during the titration process, associated to the BB titration
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Patients With Worsening of Heart Failure Signs and Symptoms
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of patients with worsening of heart failure signs and symptoms during the titration process ( from baseline to 4 month) which could be associated to the titration process.
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Patients With Admissions Due to Titration
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of patients with admissions due to titration ( not due to other causes)
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Patients: Mortality Due to Titration
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Number of patients: Mortality due to titration ( not due to other causes)
|
4 months
|
|
Number of Paticipants With Drug Stop (Some Titration Drug Withdrawal Due to Intolerance, no Need or Change to Other Treatment)
Time Frame: 4 months
|
number of paticipants with drug Stop ( withdrawal) that occur during the titration process that could be due to an adverse event.
( it can be not only due to an adverse event but because there is no need of this drug or its substitution for another kind of drug)
|
4 months
|
|
Change in % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups) Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts.
|
6 months
|
|
N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide Improvement (Nt-proBNP)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Nt-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) Improvement (Decrease) difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups, mean (SD)
|
6 months
|
|
6 Minute Walking Test
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 minute walking test improvement ( change) meters.Improvement (difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups Six minute walking test.
Measurement of exercise capacity is an integral element in assessment of patients with cardiopulmonary disease.
It provides information regarding functional capacity, response to therapy and prognosis across a range of chronic cardiopulmonary conditions.
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance (meters) an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface.
The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway.
|
6 months
|
|
Number of Participants n(%) in New York Heart Association Functional Classification I,II,III,IV
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of participants class I-IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, based on severity of symptoms and physical activity: NYHA I (better): No limitation of physical activity; NYHA II: Slight limitation of ordinary physical activity, breathlessness; NYHA III: marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity results in undue breathlessness, fatigue or palpitations; NYHA IV ( worse): unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.Symptoms at rest can be present. If any physical activity is undertaken discomfort is increased. |
6 months
|
|
Quality of Life: MLWHFQ
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Quality of Life, measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Improvement (change) from baseline to 6 months. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ). The content of this questionnaire was selected to be representative of the ways heart failure and treatments can affect the key physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life of patients with heart failure. It consist of 21-items with score 0-5. Final evaluation moves from 0 (none) to 105 (very much); a lower score means better quality of life. |
6 months
|
|
European Quality of Life Scale: EuroQol- 5 Dimension Index
Time Frame: 6 months
|
European Quality of Life Scale: EuroQol- 5 Dimension index (Range: 1 full health-0 death). It measures health status self-reported by the patient. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into three levels: 1 no problem; 2 some or moderate problems; 3 extreme problems. The EuroQol Research Foundation converts this information into a single summary index, by applying a formula that attaches specific country values (called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The index is calculated by subtracting the mentioned weights from 1, the value for full health. We measured the EuroQol-5D index improvement (change) from baseline to 6 months. More information in: EQ-5D-3L-User-Guide_version-6.0 (1).pdf |
6 months
|
|
Number of Patients With Admissions Due to Heart Failure (HF)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of patients with hospital admissions due to Heart Failure.
From Baseline to 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Number of Patients With Deaths
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of Patients with deaths due to Cardiovascular and non cardiovascular causes
|
6 months
|
|
ACEI % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 Months
|
ACEI mean Relative dose is the mean dose of ACEI achieved 4 months after starting titration, relative to target dose (%) described in European guidelines
|
4 Months
|
|
ARB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 months
|
ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers, mean relative dose ( % to target dose). Target dose is described in European guidelines. Measured at 4 months after starting titration. |
4 months
|
|
MRA % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose
Time Frame: 4 months
|
MRA % relative dose (mean) is the mean dose achieved 4 months after starting titration with regard to target dose (%) described in european guidelines
|
4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria Juana Oyanguren, Nurse, Osakidetza-Servicio vasco de Salud
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Oyanguren J, Garcia-Garrido L, Nebot Margalef M, Lekuona I, Comin-Colet J, Manito N, Roure J, Ruiz Rodriguez P, Enjuanes C, Latorre P, Torcal Laguna J, Garcia-Gutierrez S; ETIFIC7 research group. Design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of dose titration by specialized nurses in patients with heart failure. ETIFIC study protocol. ESC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;4(4):507-519. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12152. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
- Oyanguren J, Garcia-Garrido L, Nebot-Margalef M, Latorre-Garcia P, Torcal-Laguna J, Comin-Colet J, Roure J, Gonzalez-Costello J, Manito N, Garcia-Pinilla JM, Sanchez-Paule Y, Varela-Roman A, Moure M, Segovia-Cubero J, Soria T, Arana-Arri E, Lekuona I; Steering Committee on behalf of the ETIFIC research team group. Noninferiority of heart failure nurse titration versus heart failure cardiologist titration. ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun;74(6):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Jun 24. English, Spanish.
- Oyanguren J, Diaz-Molina B, Lekuona I, Gonzalez-Costello J, Lopez-Fernandez S, Garcia-Pinilla JM, Garcia-Garrido L, Lopez-Moyano G, Manito N, Cobo-Marcos M, Nebot-Margalef M, Latorre-Garcia P, Arana-Arri E, Perez-Fernandez S, Torcal-Laguna J; ETIFIC research team group. Gender differences in drug titration among heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in the ETIFIC trial. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 Aug;75(8):636-648. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Dec 10. English, Spanish.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI14/01208
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Umeå UniversityRegion NorrbottenNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureSweden
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration
-
Duke UniversityStory Health Inc.CompletedHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionUnited States
-
Finn GustafssonNovo Nordisk A/S; AbbottRecruitingHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Advanced Heart FailureDenmark
-
University of California, San FranciscoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedDepression | Quality of Life | Pain | DyspneaUnited States
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruiting
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsWilliam Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamUS Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedHeart FailureUnited States
-
Hospital Universitari de BellvitgeInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de BellvitgeCompleted
-
KU LeuvenUnknown
-
University Hospital, AkershusOslo University Hospital; Drammen sykehusRecruiting