- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06576752
Management of Patients with Heart Failure At Home After Hospital Discharge (STRONG@HOME)
March 21, 2025 updated by: Peder L. Myhre, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Akershus
Contemporary Post-Discharge Management in Heart Failure At Home
This study aims to assess whether patients with acute heart failure (HF) can achieve the same level of HF-therapies by digital follow-up at home as compared to hospital visits according to the STRONG-HF strategy.
Patients admitted to hospital with acute HF will be enrolled and randomized to either follow-up at the hospital out-patient clinic or digital follow-up at home.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
This study seeks to enhance the management of HF patients by demonstrating that follow-up and medication up-titration can be effectively carried out digitally at home, thereby relieving the burden on healthcare systems and patients.
There exists a substantial knowledge gap in the implementation of life-saving HF drugs that have been shown to significantly reduce mortality in HF patients, by as much as 73%.
Despite strong evidence from clinical trials and guidelines, the utilization of optimal HF therapy among patients remains low.
The successful STRONG-HF trial demonstrated improved outcomes through early and rapid up-titration of HF medications and follow-up at specialized HF clinics after discharge, and this strategy is now strongly recommended in the updated European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Guidelines from 2023.
However, a major challenge was the need for patients to travel to the hospital for weekly visits, which posed significant barriers for many patients, especially in geographically dispersed regions due to travel distance, immobility, and logistical challenges.
To address this gap, the STRONG@HOME trial aims to conduct visits and rapid up-titration of medications in the patient's home, a strategy not previously tested in a clinical trial and with direct clinical implications.
The success of this approach has the potential to improve HF care globally and advance the field of implementation science in HF and other chronic diseases.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
450
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Peder L Myhre, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +47 93025644
- Email: p.l.myhre@medisin.uio.no
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Henrik Schirmer, MD, PhD
- Email: henrik.schirmer@medisin.uio.no
Study Locations
-
-
Akershus
-
Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway, 1478
- Recruiting
- Akershus University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Terjei Øvrebotten, MD
- Phone Number: +4767960000
- Email: tarjei.ovrebotten@gmail.com
-
-
Vestre Viken
-
Drammen, Vestre Viken, Norway, 1878
- Recruiting
- Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken HF
-
Contact:
- John Munkhaugen, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +47 32 80 30 00
- Email: johmun@vestreviken.no
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hospital admission within the 72 hours prior to screening for acute HF.
- NT-proBNP > 1,500 pg/mL measured during the hospitalization
- Systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg and of heart rate ≥ 60 bpm within 24 hours before randomization
- Serum potassium ≤ 5.0 mEq/L (mmol/L).
- ≤ ½ the optimal dose of ACEi/ARB/ARNi or beta-blocker or MRA.
- Written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age below 18 or above 85 years.
- Clearly documented intolerance to high doses of beta-blockers
- Clearly documented intolerance to high doses of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers (both ACEi and ARB).
- Renal disease or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73m2 at screening or history of dialysis.
- Prior (defined as less than 30 days from screening) or current enrollment in a HF intervention or participation in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to screening
- Index event (admission for acute HF) triggered primarily by a completely reversable etiology so that it is unlikely the patient will be classified with chronic HF after discharge, such as Takotsubo syndrome (stress cardiomyopathy). In the setting of acute coronary syndrome or tachycardia, this should be managed before considering the presence of HF. This does not apply to patients with chronic HF prior to the index event.
- Severe non-adherence to medications
- Psychiatric or neurological disorder, cirrhosis, or active malignancy leading to a life expectancy less than 6 months.
- History of heart transplant or on a transplant list, or using or planned to be implanted with a ventricular assist device.
- Uncorrected thyroid disease, active myocarditis, or known amyloid or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
- Inability to comply with all study requirements, due to major co-morbidities, social or financial issues, or a history of noncompliance with medical regimens, that might compromise the patients ability to understand and/or comply with the protocol instructions or follow-up procedures.
- Low digital competency classified as inability to handle a smartphone or tablet.
- Language barriers requiring the need for an external interpreter.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Home care
Follow-up and management of HF medications at home visits after 1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks performed by telecommunication led by HF nurses in close communication with physician at the institution.
Around week 2 a single visit to the primary care physician's office is required.
|
Both arms will treat the patients according to the STRONG-HF intensive care strategy, as recommended by current guidelines.
That is up-titration to at least half of maximum tolerated doses of HF medications at discharge, followed by up-titration to maximum tolerated doses after 2 weeks.
Safety visits will be performed after 1, 3 and 6 weeks.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Hospital care
Follow-up and management of HF medications provided by specialists at the participating institutions' outpatient clinics after 1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks.
(Same as the high-intensity arm in STRONG-HF)
|
Both arms will treat the patients according to the STRONG-HF intensive care strategy, as recommended by current guidelines.
That is up-titration to at least half of maximum tolerated doses of HF medications at discharge, followed by up-titration to maximum tolerated doses after 2 weeks.
Safety visits will be performed after 1, 3 and 6 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Guideline recommended medical treatment Score (0-9)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Patients are assigned a score for each of the four drug classes, and the sum of these is the total score.
For beta-blockers and ACEi/ARBs, patients are assigned 0 (no treatment), 1 (<50% target daily dose), or 2 points (≥50% target daily dose) for each therapy.
Any dose of ARNI instead of ACEi/ARB are assigned 3 points.
Any dose of MRA and SGLT2i are assigned 2 points.
Proportion of patients with ≥50% dose of ACEi/ARB/ARNI, MRA and beta blocker and treatment with SGLT2i
|
90 days
|
|
Treatment-emergent adverse events
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Proportion of patients with eGFR of <30 mL/min/1.73
m2, systolic BP of <95 mm Hg, heart rate of <50 bpm, and serum potassium of >5.5 mmol/L.
|
90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Achieved dose in each of the components of the primary endpoint (mg)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Renin-angiotensin-system blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and beta blockers, and treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2-inhibitors
|
90 days
|
|
Proportion of patients with baseline LVEF<40% with ≥50% dose of guideline recommended heart failure medications
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Proportion of patients with ≥50% dose of renin-angiotensin-system blockers, mineralocorticoidreceptor antagonists and beta blockers, and treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2-inhibitors in the subgroup with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction<40%
|
90 days
|
|
Change in quality of life by EQ-5D index
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Measured by EuroQol Group (EQ-5D) index questionnaire (range 11111 to 55555, higher is worse)
|
90 days
|
|
Change in quality of life by EQ-5D VAS
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Measured by EuroQol Group (EQ-5D) questionnaire (range 0 to 100, lower is worse)
|
90 days
|
|
Change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (ng/L)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
From baseline
|
90 days
|
|
Change in echocardiographic measures of left ventricular structure
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Left ventricular end diastolic volume index (ml/m^2)
|
90 days
|
|
Change in body weight (kg)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
From baseline
|
90 days
|
|
Self-care
Time Frame: 90 days
|
European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour [EHFScB] scale (range 9-45, higher is worse)
|
90 days
|
|
Patient satisfaction with digital follow-up
Time Frame: 90 days
|
IT-HEART questionnaire (range 10-50, higher is worse)
|
90 days
|
|
Number of heart failure readmissions
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
|
Admissions to the hospital for heart failure
|
12 months and 24 months
|
|
Number of total readmissions
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
|
All admissions to the hospital
|
12 months and 24 months
|
|
Time out of hospital
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
|
Days not admitted to a hospital after baseline
|
12 months and 24 months
|
|
Number of deaths
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
|
All-cause mortality
|
12 months and 24 months
|
|
Cost
Time Frame: 90 days, 12 months, 24 months
|
To evaluate the total cost of each follow up strategy by summarizing the cost of healthcare utilization, digital platform costs and travel costs
|
90 days, 12 months, 24 months
|
|
Change in HF-specific quality of life
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Minnesota Living with HF questionnaire (range 0-105, higher is worse)
|
90 days
|
|
Change in echocardiographic measure of cardiac diastolic function
Time Frame: 90 days
|
E/e' (ratio)
|
90 days
|
|
Change in echocardiographic measure of cardiac systolic function
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 27, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
August 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 21, 2025
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 721190
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
The investigators do not plan to share individual participant data
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Digital follow-up and uptitration of medications at home after hospital discharge for heart failure
-
Pôle Saint HélierClinique Mutualiste la SagesseCompleted
-
McMaster UniversityCompleted
-
University of MinnesotaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedWound Infection Due to Staphylococcus Aureus | MRSA Infection of Postoperative WoundUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkRegion SyddanmarkNot yet recruitingHallucinations, AuditoryDenmark
-
University of AarhusOdense University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Bispebjerg Hospital; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingQuality of Life | Colorectal Cancer | SurvivorshipDenmark
-
RenJi HospitalNot yet recruitingHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) | Restrictive Cardiomyopathy | Metabolic Cardiomyopathy | Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)China
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterCompletedNon-Hodgkin's Lymphoma | CNS Lymphoma | CNS Brain CancerUnited States