Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CHAM* for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers (*OTI-15-01)

October 5, 2017 updated by: Osiris Therapeutics

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind Study With an Open-Label Extension Option to Further Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cryopreserved Human Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind Study with an Open-Label Extension Option to Further Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cryopreserved Human Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85723
        • SAVAHCS
    • California
      • Carlsbad, California, United States, 92009
        • ILD Research Center
      • Castro Valley, California, United States, 94546
        • Center for Clinical Research
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • Center for Clinical Research
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
    • Florida
      • North Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33169
        • Barry University Clinical Research
    • Massachusetts
      • South Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States, 02190
        • SSH
    • New Jersey
      • Toms River, New Jersey, United States, 08753
        • Ocean County Foot & Ankle Surgical Associates
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
        • NSLIJHS
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • UNC
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States, 16602
        • University Orthopedics
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Temple University
    • South Carolina
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29303
        • Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • North Texas Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Associates
      • Webster, Texas, United States, 77598
        • Texas Gulf Coast Medical Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between 18 years and 80 years of age inclusive, as of the date of screening
  2. Confirmed diagnosis of Type I or Type II Diabetes
  3. An Index Ulcer defined as chronic (presence of wound for > 4 weeks), but not present for more than 52 weeks at the Screening Visit
  4. Index Ulcer is located below the malleoli on the plantar or dorsal surface of the foot
  5. The Index Ulcer is between 1 cm2 and 15 cm2, inclusive, at the Screening Visit
  6. The Index Ulcer extends into the dermis or subcutaneous tissue without evidence of exposed muscle, tendon, bone, or joint capsule
  7. Wound is free of necrotic debris
  8. Patient has adequate circulation to the foot as documented by either:

    • Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) > 0.70 and < 1.30, or
    • In patients with non-compressible ankle vessels defined as an ABI ≥ 1.30, a Toe Brachial Index (TBI) ≥ 0.50, or
    • In patients with non-compressible ankle vessels defined as an ABI ≥ 1.30 and TBI cannot be performed (e.g., toe is absent, wounds are present, or site cannot perform a TBI), a Doppler waveform in the posterior tibial or dorsalis pedis arteries at the ankle consistent with adequate flow in the foot (biphasic or triphasic) and other diagnostic confirmation of adequate flow (e.g., duplex imaging, normal pulse volume recording [PVR] testing).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Index Ulcer is of non-diabetic pathophysiology
  2. Gangrene is present on any part of the affected foot
  3. Index Ulcer is over an active Charcot deformity
  4. The longest dimension of the Index Ulcer exceeds 5 cm at the Baseline Visit
  5. Patient is currently receiving dialysis or planning to go on dialysis
  6. Patient has had 2 or more previous disease-related amputations of the lower extremities
  7. Patient has a glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of >10%
  8. Chronic oral steroid use >7.5 mg daily for longer than 3 months at the time of screening
  9. Patient is receiving IV corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents at the time of screening
  10. Requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics to treat the index wound infection at the time of screening
  11. Patient has an ulcer within 5 cm of the Index Ulcer identified for study consideration
  12. Patient is Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive or has Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
  13. Current evidence of cellulitis, or other evidence of infection including fever or pus drainage from the wound site
  14. Current evidence of osteomyelitis or history of osteomyelitis within 30 days of screening
  15. Patient has active malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer
  16. Patient's Index Ulcer has decreased by ≥20% during 1-week screening period
  17. Patient's random blood sugar is >350 mg/dl at screening
  18. Patient has untreated alcohol or substance abuse at the time of screening
  19. Pregnant women and women who are breastfeeding
  20. Patient is currently enrolled or participated in another investigational device, drug, or biological trial within 30 days of screening
  21. Patient has had within the last 30 days, or is currently undergoing, or is planning for wound treatments with growth factors, living skin, dermal substitutes or other advanced biological therapies
  22. Patient is an employee, or an immediate family member of an employee, of the sponsor company or site research staff conducting the study
  23. Patients who have already been randomized in Protocol 303 at any center may not be considered for screening or for re-entry into the trial at any center, even after the end of their follow-up period
  24. Patients with a history of poor compliance, or an unwillingness or inability to adhere to the requirements of the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Active Comparator: CHAM
Cryopreserved Human Amniotic Membrane
The treatment indication is for chronic diabetic foot ulcers that can accommodate up to one 5cm x 5cm piece of CHAM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete closure of the index wound, defined as 100% re-epithelialization as determined by the Investigator, by the End of Single-Blind Treatment Visit with follow-up confirmation of continued closure at 2 consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart
Time Frame: Up to 112 days after Baseline Visit
Up to 112 days after Baseline Visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete index wound closure by the End of Single-Blind Treatment Visit as defined by 100% re-epithelialization, as determined by the Investigator.
Time Frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline Visit
Up to 84 days after Baseline Visit
Time to initial wound closure among patients that receive CHAM versus those that receive control as measured by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Time Frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline Visit
Up to 84 days after Baseline Visit
Proportion of patients receiving CHAM that achieve a 50% reduction or greater in wound size by Day 28 (± 3 days) versus those that receive control.
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after Baseline
Up to 28 days after Baseline
Number of applications of CHAM versus control
Time Frame: Up to 77 days after Baseline
Up to 77 days after Baseline
Percentage of patients who achieve complete wound closure, defined as 100% re-epithelialization as determined by the Investigator, who participate in the Open-Label Treatment Phase
Time Frame: Up to 91 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase
Up to 91 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Wound re-occurrence for up to 3 months after initial wound closure in patients receiving CHAM versus control.
Time Frame: Up to 84 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase
Up to 84 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase
Number and types of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time Frame: Up to 84 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase
Up to 84 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase
Number of patients with worsening of wound defined by a 50% increase in wound size
Time Frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline
Up to 84 days after Baseline
Change in Quality of Life from Baseline, as determined by the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS)
Time Frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline
Up to 84 days after Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe