Study of Subretinal Implantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived RPE Cells in Advanced Dry AMD

May 27, 2020 updated by: Regenerative Patch Technologies, LLC

A Phase I/IIa Safety Study of Subretinal Implantation of CPCB-RPE1 (Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Seeded on a Polymeric Substrate) in Subjects With Advanced, Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

The Phase I/IIa clinical trial is designed to assess the feasibility of delivery and safety of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived RPE Cells on a parylene membrane (CPCB-RPE1) in patients with advanced, dry age-related macular degeneration.

Primary Objective:

• To test the safety and tolerability of CPCB-RPE1 during and after subretinal implantation in patients with geographic atrophy with evidence of involvement of the central fovea.

Secondary Objective:

• To assess visual acuity, visual field, and retinal function after CPCB-RPE1 implantation. Implanted and fellow eyes will be compared post-implantation to assess the ability of the implant to prevent disease progression.

Exploratory Objectives:

• To assess the feasibility of measuring the change in area of geographic atrophy over time using spectral domain optical coherence tomography or fundus autofluorescence.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will include two cohorts, each of 10 patients. For the first cohort, the study population will be patients with advanced, dry AMD with evidence of significant geographic atrophy involving the fovea. These patients will have significant central vision loss with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye to be implanted of BCVA of 20/200 or worse. Each of these patients will have substantial RPE and photoreceptor loss. Patients will be screened for overall health status to minimize risks associated with retinal surgery and any subsequent immunosuppression.

As the safety and tolerability of CPCB-RPE1 is demonstrated in the first cohort, patients with less advanced disease will be recruited into a second cohort in this Phase I/IIa clinical trial. In this second cohort patients will have significant central vision loss with BCVA of the eye to be implanted of 20/80 or worse, but better than or equal to 20/400 with comparably less damage to the RPE/photoreceptor complex than Cohort 1. These patients will be screened in the same manner for overall health status to minimize risks associated with retinal surgery and any subsequent immunosuppression. Assessments of visual function will be the same as in Cohort 1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85053
        • Retinal Consultants of Arizona LTD
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC Keck School of Medicine / Eye Institute
      • Palm Desert, California, United States, 92211
        • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
        • Orange County Retina Medical Group
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93103
        • California Retina Consultants

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

51 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent
  2. Adult male or female patients with the age of 55 to 85 (inclusive) years who are not employees of the trial sites
  3. In sufficiently good health to reasonably expect survival for at least five years after treatment
  4. Clinical findings consistent with advanced dry AMD with evidence of one or more areas of ≥1.25 square millimeter of geographic atrophy involving the central fovea
  5. Geographic atrophy defined as attenuation or loss of RPE as observed by biomicroscopy, OCT, or FAF
  6. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye to receive the implant will be equal or worse than 20/200 in the first half of the study patients and between 20/80 and 20/400 (inclusive) in the second half of the patients. The BCVA of the eye that is NOT to receive the implant will be better or equal to the eye that will receive the implant
  7. Medically suitable to undergo pars plana vitrectomy and the surgical implant procedure, including being able to position post-operatively and use post-operative medications as required
  8. Medically suitable for general anesthesia or monitored intravenous sedation, if needed
  9. Patients who are pseudophakic or aphakic in the study eye
  10. If designated as an organ donor, willing to forego live organ donation
  11. Willing to consent to the post-mortem removal of the implant from the treated eye for the sponsor's analysis. The patient may also elect to donate the implanted and fellow, untreated eye, for histological analysis.
  12. Able to understand the requirements of the study and willing and able to participate in long term follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of active or inactive choroidal neovascularization (CNV)
  2. Presence or history of retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, chorioretinitis, central serous choroidopathy or any other inflammatory ocular disease except dry eye syndrome
  3. Presence or history of severe, end-stage corneal dystrophy
  4. History of steroid induced ocular hypertension or glaucoma
  5. Presence of moderate to severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye, uncontrolled IOP, use of two or more topical agents to control intraocular pressure; history of glaucoma-filtering surgery
  6. Presence of moderate to severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
  7. Presence of any proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
  8. Presence of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 8) at the time of screening
  9. History of retinal detachment or retinal detachment repair in the study eye other than peripheral retinal tears or holes treated exclusively with laser or cryotherapy
  10. Presence of any other sight-threatening ocular disease
  11. History of cognitive impairments or dementia which may impact the patient's ability to participate in the informed consent process and to appropriately complete evaluations
  12. History of any immunodeficiency
  13. Evidence of herpetic or other viral eye disease
  14. Any current use of immunosuppressive therapy other than intermittent or low dose corticosteroids
  15. Participation within previous 3 months in any clinical trial of a drug by ocular or systemic administration (within previous 18 months for sustained release products)
  16. Axial myopia of greater than -8 diopters in the eye that is to be implanted
  17. Axial length greater than 28 mm in the eye that is to be implanted
  18. History of malignancy within the past 5 years (with the exception of successfully treated [excised] basal cell carcinoma [skin cancer] or successfully treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
  19. History of myocardial infarction in previous 12 months
  20. Alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) >3.0 times the upper limit of normal or any known liver disease
  21. Renal insufficiency, as defined by estimated creatinine clearance of < 45 ml/min
  22. A positive (or "reactive") test for HIV, or Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C
  23. A hemoglobin concentration of less than 10 gm/dl, a platelet count of less than 100K/µL or an absolute neutrophil count of less than 1000/µL at study entry
  24. Ocular lens removal within the previous 6 weeks in either eye
  25. Any other ocular surgery in the study eye in the previous 3 months
  26. If female, pregnancy, the wish to become pregnant, or lactation
  27. Any other medical condition, which, in the Investigator's judgment, will interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, compromises patient safety, or interferes with the interpretation of the study results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CPCB-RPE1 treatment
Subretinal implantation of CPCB-RPE1 in dry AMD patients
Patients will receive one CPCB-RPE1 implant of approximately 100,000 differentiated RPE cells attached to a small parylene membrane. The density of cells on the membrane represents the approximate density of RPE cells in the human eye. The membrane size was chosen to cover a substantial portion of the macular region of the retina.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency and Severity of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of product, procedure and immunosuppression related adverse events in the implanted eye to those experienced in the non-treated eye
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of VA changes in the treated eye versus baseline and versus the non-treated eye
1 year
Visual Field
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of visual field changes in the treated eye versus baseline and versus the non-treated eye
1 year
Photoreceptor Electrical Responses
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of multifocal electroretinogram changes in the treated eye versus baseline and versus the non-treated eye
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jane Lebkowski, Ph.D., Regenerative Patch Technologies

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RPT-14-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Geographic Atrophy

Clinical Trials on CPCB-RPE1

3
Subscribe