- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02611375
Conditioning Neural Circuits to Improve Upper Extremity Function
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique in which low intensity electrical current is applied over the skull in order to excite the underlying brain tissue. It has been studied in many populations (stroke, spinal cord injury, learning disability, migraine, memory) and may be a useful counterpart to traditional rehabilitation of neurological injuries. Preliminary studies from members of the investigator's lab group have indicated beneficial, single-session effects of tDCS on hand function in people with spinal cord injury. Longer-term, multi-session trials are now warranted.
Another approach that has research support for augmenting the effects of hand function training is peripheral nerve somatosensory stimulation (PNSS). Unlike tDCS, which excites brain tissue directly, PNSS excites the brain via an indirect approach. Members of the investigators' lab have found the combination of PNSS and fine motor training to be more effective in improving hand function than either intervention alone. Multi-session trials of PNSS have been conducted; however it has not yet been compared with another clinically accessible adjunctive therapy, like tDCS, in a multi-session trial.
The investigators plan to study the comparative effects of tDCS and hand function training to PNSS and hand function training and hand function training alone in people with neck-level spinal cord injuries. People with both acute/subacute (<6 months post-injury) and chronic (>1 year post-injury) injuries will be enrolled, in order to look at responses to tDCS at different stages of recovery.
Before beginning training, participants will complete approximately three hours of testing of their arm/hand function and self-reported perception of their overall function. Participants will then be randomly assigned to receive either tDCS, PNSS, or sham tDCS in combination with personalized fine motor training. This training will take place 3 times/week, for a total of 3 hours of training/week, for 4 weeks. Fine motor training will be based on principles that have been shown to optimize neuroplasticity (changes in the brain and/or spinal cord), yet customized, in order to allow participants to work towards individualized goals. At the end of 4 weeks, participants will complete a three-hour post-test using the same measures as before to examine any changes in arm and hand function. Participants will be asked to return to Shepherd Center 4 - 6 weeks following the post-intervention assessment to complete the post-intervention assessment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Shepherd Center, Inc.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be 18-65 years of age
- Have a cervical (neurological level C1-C8) SCI that occurred either <6 months ago (subacute) or >1 year (chronic) prior to the time of enrollment
- For subjects with acute/subacute SCI: the injury must be a traumatic injury (i.e. not the result of illness or a condition within the body)
- Have ISNCSCI severity classification (A, B, C or D)
- Have self-reported limitations in arm and hand function in at least one upper limb (a GRASSP quantitative score of no more than 26/30 in the hand that is the focus of treatment)
- Have the ability to pick up objects with at least one hand without using assistive devices (a GRASSP quantitative score of at least 4/30 in the hand that is the focus of treatment)
- Have shoulder strength lift an arm up to chest level
- Have the ability to sit for at least one hour at a time (e.g. good skin integrity, stable blood pressure)
- For subjects with acute/subacute SCI: adequate time remaining in their treatment at Shepherd Center to allow 5 weeks of participation
- For subjects with chronic SCI: active hand function is required (see Pre-intervention assessment) reliable transportation in order to complete the intervention in its entirety
- Ability and willingness to consent and authorize use of personal health information
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pacemaker or a metal implant in the head
- Current pregnancy
- Severe shoulder weakness, injury, or pain that contraindicates repetitive fine motor training
- Lower motor neuron damage (as documented in medical record, per participant report, or as noted by in-person screening)
- Severe hypersensitivity or pain of the arm/hand
- Severe contractures of the arm/hand that would limit participation in fine motor training
- Prior tendon or nerve transfer surgery
- Have a history of seizures
- Have a history of frequent or severe headaches
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: tDCS + FTP group
This group of individuals with tetraplegia will receive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the hand area of their primary motor cortex (M1).
Stimulation at 2mA will be applied for 20 minutes while subjects complete a total of 1 hour of functional task practice (FTP) per session.
(Only 20 minutes of functional task practice be be performed with stimulation on). 3 sessions will be completed per week for 4 weeks.
|
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation is applied over the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1).
Parameters= 2mA for 20 minutes.
Functional task practice will be completed concurrently with tDCS and for approximate 40 minutes after the stimulation stops.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: PNSS + FTP group
This group of individuals with tetraplegia will receive peripheral nerve somatosensory stimulation (PNSS) to the median nerve of the primary hand being trained.
Stimulation will be set to elicit a sensory - not motor - response.
Stimulation will be performed concurrently with the entire functional task practice (FTP) session.
3 sessions will be completed per week for 4 weeks.
|
Electrical stimulation will be applied to the median nerve of the primary hand being trained at parameters that elicit a sensory but not motor response (called "peripheral nerve somatosensory stimulation").
Stimulation parameters are 100Hz with a 250uS pulse width.
Stimulation intensity will vary between 1-10mA per participant.
Stimulation will be applied for 1 hour and functional task practice will be completed concurrent with the stimulation.
|
Active Comparator: sham tDCS + FTP group
This group of individuals with tetraplegia will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the hand area of their primary motor cortex (M1) alongside functional task practice.
Stimulation will be briefly turned on at the beginning of FTP and again after 20 minutes of practice in order to create a sham effect and maintain blinding of the participants.
3 sessions will be completed per week for 4 weeks.
|
During sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a sham tDCS device will be used along with functional task practice.
The sham tDCS unit will be used for the first 20 minutes of FTP, followed by an additional 40 minutes of FTP.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Quantitative Prehension Ability (GRASSP subtest)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up upper extremity impairment and function
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Upper Extremity Strength (Grip and Pinch Strength)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up upper extremity impairment and function
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Change in Upper Extremity Sensation (Semmes-Weinstein)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up upper extremity impairment and function
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Change in Perceived Upper Extremity Performance & Satisfaction (COPM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up self-perceived upper extremity function
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Short-term change in Quantitative Prehension Ability (Abbreviated GRASSP) subtest)
Time Frame: weekly during 4-week treatment period
|
weekly assessment of upper extremity function
|
weekly during 4-week treatment period
|
Classification of Upper Extremity Function (BHUEF)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up upper extremity impairment and function
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Detection of Hand Muscle Activation (subclinical EMG)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up upper extremity impairment and function
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Change in Perceived Quality of Life (SCI QoL Basic Data Set)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up self-perceived quality of life rating
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Change in Cortical Excitability (motor evoked potentials)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up neural excitability
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Change in Spinal Reflex Excitability (joint threshold angle)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Pre-, post-, and follow-up neural excitability
|
Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 4-6 weeks post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35. doi: 10.1177/1545968310361957. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
- Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
- Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
- Biering-Sorensen F, Bryden A, Curt A, Friden J, Harvey LA, Mulcahey MJ, Popovic MR, Prochazka A, Sinnott KA, Snoek G. International spinal cord injury upper extremity basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2014 Sep;52(9):652-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.87. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
- Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):905-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
- Gomes-Osman J, Field-Fote EC. Bihemispheric anodal corticomotor stimulation using transcranial direct current stimulation improves bimanual typing task performance. J Mot Behav. 2013;45(4):361-7. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.808604. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
- Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Mar;19(1):33-45. doi: 10.1177/1545968305274517.
- Hoffman LR, Field-Fote EC. Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: a case report. Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;87(2):208-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050365. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
- Hoffman LR, Field-Fote EC. Functional and corticomotor changes in individuals with tetraplegia following unimanual or bimanual massed practice training with somatosensory stimulation: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010 Dec;34(4):193-201. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181fbe692.
- Gomes-Osman J, Field-Fote EC. Cortical vs. afferent stimulation as an adjunct to functional task practice training: a randomized, comparative pilot study in people with cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Aug;29(8):771-82. doi: 10.1177/0269215514556087. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
- Charlifue S, Post MW, Biering-Sorensen F, Catz A, Dijkers M, Geyh S, Horsewell J, Noonan V, Noreau L, Tate D, Sinnott KA. International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):672-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.27. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
- Lohse KR, Boyd LA, Hodges NJ. Engaging Environments Enhance Motor Skill Learning in a Computer Gaming Task. J Mot Behav. 2016;48(2):172-82. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1068158. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
- Velstra IM, Curt A, Frotzler A, Abel R, Kalsi-Ryan S, Rietman JS, Bolliger M. Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):755-66. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565466. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- tDCS-668
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanThe Industrial Technology Research InstituteUnknownSpinal Cord Injuries | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryTaiwan
-
University of FloridaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingSCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingBlood Pressure | Spinal Cord Injuries | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Blood Pressure Disorders | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Acute Spinal Cord Injury | Neuromodulation | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
NervGen PharmaRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Chronic Spinal Cord Injury | Subacute Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Kevin KilgoreNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete LesionUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Cervical Spinal Cord Injury | Traumatic Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
-
S.Biomedics Co., Ltd.Yonsei University; Linical Co., Ltd.RecruitingSpinal Cord Injury, Acute | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C4 Level With Complete LesionKorea, Republic of
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryThailand
-
Kessler FoundationNew Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord ResearchRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on transcranial direct current stimulation
-
Medical University of South CarolinaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompleted
-
University of Campinas, BrazilUnknownEpilepsy IntractableBrazil
-
Dina Hatem ElhammadyUnknown
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)CompletedStroke | Nonfluent AphasiaUnited States
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyRecruitingSpinal Cord Diseases | Spinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Federal University of ParaíbaUnknown
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health servicesRecruitingCervicogenic HeadacheCanada
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNot yet recruitingLow Back Pain | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
Nanyang Technological UniversityActive, not recruiting