Evaluate the Safety Profile and Ability of TW1025 Oral Solution to Decrease Fatigue

October 20, 2016 updated by: Meriyana Bio Inc.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Study to Evaluate the Safety Profile and Ability of TW1025 to Decrease Fatigue

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study to evaluate the safety profile and ability of TW1025 oral solution to decrease fatigue in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study population designed to be enrolled is patients with histologically and/or cytologically confirmed breast cancer with clinical evidence of recurrent or progressive HER2-negative metastatic disease and planning to begin a chemotherapy regimen of physician's choice for HER2-negative MBC who have evidence of fatigue.

An add-on study design to assess the superiority of TW1025 over placebo will be utilized in this study to evaluate whether TW1025 can decrease fatigue in patients with fatigue. The study will be conducted as a double-blind, randomized trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A patient is eligible for the study if all of the following apply:

    1. Female patients at least 18 years of age for study sites in the United States and 20 to 80 years old (inclusive) for study sites in Taiwan
    2. Histologically and/or cytologically confirmed HER2-negative breast cancer with clinical evidence of recurrent or progressive metastatic disease
    3. Patients may have measurable or nonmeasurable metastatic breast cancer.
    4. Planning to begin a new chemotherapy regimen of the physician's choice
    5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2
    6. HER2-negative disease per College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines (immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, 1+, or if 2+ fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)-negative ratio < 2.0)
    7. Known ER status: ER-negative (0% of cells positive for ER) or ER-positive (≥1% cells positive for ER) by IHC
    8. Adequate bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500 /µL, hemoglobin count ≥ 8 g/dL, and platelet count > 100,000/µL), total serum bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL and SGOT/SGPT less than 5-times the upper limit of normal if liver metastases are present or < 2.5-times the upper limit of normal if no liver metastases, and serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL
    9. Fatigue score of ≥5 on a 1-to-10 linear analog scale
    10. Pain score of ≤4 on a 1-to-10 linear analog scale
    11. Insomnia score of ≤4 on a 1-to-10 linear analog scale
    12. If of childbearing potential, agrees to use reliable contraceptive method(s) during participation in the study
    13. Estimated life expectancy of at least 6 months
    14. Has provided written informed consent and HIPAA authorization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient meeting any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from study participation:

    1. Has received radiotherapy or cytotoxic therapy within 3 weeks
    2. Any uncontrolled infection
    3. History of lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylosis, scleroderma, or multiple sclerosis
    4. History of known brain metastases; Screening for brain metastases is not required
    5. More than 4 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease
    6. Requirement for ongoing systemic steroid therapy
    7. Currently using any other pharmacologic agents or nonpharmacologic interventions to specifically treat fatigue including psychostimulants, antidepressants, acupuncture, etc.

      Note: Antidepressants used to treat items other than fatigue (such as depression or hot flashes) are allowed if the patient has been on a stable dose for ≥ 3 months and plans to continue for ≥ 1 month. Erythropoietin agents to treat anemia are allowed. Exercise is allowed.

    8. Pain requiring long-acting continuous release narcotic pain medication; however, short-acting opioids (oxycodone, hydrocodone), tramadol, and over the counter analgesics such as acetaminophen or NSAIDs are allowed
    9. Use of any over the counter herbal/dietary supplement marketed for fatigue or energy (for example, products containing any type of ginseng, rhodiola rosea, high doses of caffeine, guarana, or anything called an "adaptogen")
    10. Uncontrolled nausea or vomiting or any symptom that would prevent the ability to comply with daily oral TW1025/placebo treatment
    11. Uncontrolled thyroid disorder
    12. Psychiatric disorder such as severe depression, manic depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or schizophrenia (Defined per medical history)
    13. Any other serious diseases/medical history that would limit the patient's ability to receive study therapy as assessed by the investigator
    14. Lactating, pregnant, or plans to be become pregnant
    15. Has received an investigational agent within 4 weeks of entering this study
    16. History of adverse reactions to any of the ingredients in TW1025.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TW1025
TW1025 oral solution, 20ml, 3 times per day (daily dose: 60 ml)
20ml, 3 times per day (daily dose: 60 ml)
Other Names:
  • Linease oral solution
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
TW1025 oral solution matched placebo, 20ml, 3 times per day
20ml, 3 times per day (daily dose: 60 ml)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue scores at 9 weeks post-supplement initiation (+/- 1 week) compared with baseline
Time Frame: Baseline vs 9 weeks
Change in fatigue scores at 9 weeks post-initiation of supplementation with TW1025/Placebo compared with baseline, assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue subscale
Baseline vs 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: 1 year after discontinuation of study treatment
Adverse events (side effects) in each arm will be counted and compared
1 year after discontinuation of study treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fatigue Scores at Baseline vs at 18-weeks
Time Frame: Baseline vs 18-weeks
Change in fatigue scores at 18 weeks post-supplement initiation and other on-treatment time points compared with baseline assessed by using the FACIT Fatigue subscale
Baseline vs 18-weeks
Change in Sleepiness Scores
Time Frame: Baseline vs 9 weeks
Change in Daytime sleepiness scores, assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Baseline vs 9 weeks
Change in Quality of Life Scores
Time Frame: Baseline vs 9 weeks
Change in Quality of life scores, assessed using the Quality of Life Linear Analog Scale (QOL-LAS)
Baseline vs 9 weeks
Change in Overall Impression
Time Frame: 9 weeks
The Subject Global Impression of Change is a 7-point instrument in which the patient rates the change in their overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). It has been used extensively for determination of minimally clinically significant differences in numerous oncology clinical trials. Patients will be asked to fill out the Global Impression of Change scale at week 9 after starting study therapy only.
9 weeks
Levels of C-reactive protein in blood
Time Frame: baseline vs 9-weeks vs 18-weeks
C-reactive protein levels will be measured at baseline, and at weeks 9 and 18 following initiation of dietary supplement.
baseline vs 9-weeks vs 18-weeks
Change in Gene Expression
Time Frame: Baseline vs 9-weeks vs 18-weeks
Change in Whole blood gene expression profiles will be assessed using the NanoString® human immunology and the human inflammation gene panels at baseline and at weeks 9 and 18 of dietary supplementation. RNA-Seq or other methodologies may also be utilized to evaluate cytokine and immune cell signaling pathways
Baseline vs 9-weeks vs 18-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, MD, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
  • Study Director: Jacqueline Whang-Peng, MD., Director, Division of Cancer Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Anderson Thomas, MD, Texas Oncology-Bedford
  • Principal Investigator: Danso Michael, MD, Virginia Oncology Associates
  • Principal Investigator: Encarnacion Carlos, MD, Texas Oncology-Waco
  • Principal Investigator: Fleischauer Scott, MD, Texas Oncology-Arlington North
  • Principal Investigator: Taguchi Julie, MD, Sansum Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Wang Grace, MD, Baptist Health Medical Group Oncology, LLC
  • Principal Investigator: Holmes Frankie, MD, Texas Oncology-Memorial City
  • Principal Investigator: Houck William, MD, Shenandoah Oncology, P.C.
  • Principal Investigator: Crane Gregory, MD, The University of Kansas Cancer Center
  • Principal Investigator: Tsai Michaela, MD, Minnesota Oncology Hematology, P.A.
  • Principal Investigator: Vukelja Svetislava, MD, Texas Oncology-Tyler
  • Principal Investigator: Lee Jae, MD, Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center
  • Principal Investigator: Smith II John, MD, Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TW1025-2014
  • 13145 (Other Identifier: US Oncology Research LLC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Each study site has at least three monitors for the study and all of data will send to Data Center in DSG immediately for all study physicians reference.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

3
Subscribe