Impact of Graft Steatosis on Post-operative Complications After Liver Transplantation

October 12, 2016 updated by: Emad Ali Ahmed Ali, Sohag University
  1. Clinical impact of graft steatosis on postoperative complications after OLT.
  2. Recommendations to improve outcomes after transplantation of steatotic livers and increase donor pool.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction Solid organ transplantation has become the standard of care for selected patients with end-stage organ dysfunction. With improved surgical techniques, more effective immunosuppressive therapies, and better anti-infective medications, outcomes after solid organ transplantation have improved over the last several years.

The excellent survival rates reported after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) have increased the demand for liver transplants and have enhanced the disparity between the number of available donor organs and the need for such organs.

The lack of available organs for liver transplantation (LT) associated with the increased death rates among patients on most waiting lists for LT has triggered the use of so-called extended criteria donor (ECD) grafts, previously called ''suboptimal grafts''. Among the wide range of these ECD livers, hepatic steatosis is one of the most frequent disorders, which is mostly related to an increasing prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasingly significant in healthy individuals for its high worldwide prevalence, an association with the metabolic syndrome such as insulin resistance, diabetes, dyslipidemia and obesity, and an association with liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Clinical evaluation and current imaging modalities, and serological and laboratory tests can be strongly suggestive of the presence of hepatic steatosis, but none of these is capable of distinguishing steatohepatitis (SH) from uncomplicated steatosis; likewise, these evaluations can generally detect advanced liver disease (e.g. portal hypertension), but none can truly assess the degree of liver necroinflammatory injury, lesser stages of fibrosis and architectural remodeling. Liver biopsy evaluation, therefore, remains the 'gold standard' to unequivocally diagnose SH and to document the severity of hepatic injury and fibrosis.

Steatosis is assessed according to the pattern and the amount of fatty infiltration in hepatic tissue sections. Traditionally, fatty accumulation has been classified morphologically as macrovesicular or microvesicular. Macrovesicular steatosis is characterized by a single, bulky fat vacuole in the hepatocyte that displaces the nucleus to the edge of the cell. The less conspicuous microvesicular steatosis, usually related to toxins or metabolic disorders, is characterized by accumulation of tiny lipid vesicles in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes without nuclear dislocation. Current quantification and grading of liver steatosis originates from studies performed in the early 1990s, when steatosis was classified as mild, moderate, or severe if, less than 30%, 30-60%, or more than 60% of hepatocytes, respectively, display fatty infiltrations.

Although usually benign, fatty liver may associate with serious injury, with inflammation and hepatocyte necro-apoptosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), in 20-30% of subjects. Those patients are at risk of developing fibrosis, one fifth progressing to liver cirrhosis. It is apparently more slowly progressive than other chronic liver diseases, such as alcohol or viral-induced disease. Moreover, the problem of hepatocytes being fatty, overcomes the liver itself, as it increases the risk for cardiovascular disease and death and duplicates the risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), independently of the severity of liver injury.

Severe fatty livers are more susceptible to warm and cold ischemia reperfusion injury than normal ones. The type of damage is not through the pathway of cellular apoptosis, but necrosis.

The use of steatotic grafts for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with a high rate of primary graft dysfunction and decreased graft and patient survival particularly with macro-steatosis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

271

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • AN
      • Ancona, AN, Italy, 60126
        • Polytechnic University of Marche

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All adult patients candidate for liver transplantation are included in this study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients candidates for liver transplantation are included in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients are excluded.
  • Re- transplanted patients.
  • cases with no histopathological examination records

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
mild steatosis
5% - 30% of hepatocytes have fatty infiltration
Liver Transplantation with graft steatosis
moderate steatosis
30% - 60% of hepatocytes have fatty infiltration
Liver Transplantation with graft steatosis
No steatosis
No or less than 5% of hepatocytes have fatty infiltration
Liver Transplantation with graft steatosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative complications rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
according to the Clavien- Dindo classification system
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biliary complications: stricture or leakage
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the outcome will be measured retrospectively from the hospital records and prospectively in the recent cases of transplantation
through study completion, an average of 1 year
early graft dysfunction (EGD), which is defined as impaired initial allograft function with high peak serum transaminase and persistent high bilirubin levels.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the outcome will be measured retrospectively from the hospital records and prospectively in the recent cases of transplantation
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Primary graft non-function (PNF), which is defined as primary failure of the graft followed by death or re-transplantation within the first post transplantation week.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the outcome will be measured retrospectively from the hospital records and prospectively in the recent cases of transplantation
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alaa A. Redwan, Professor, Sohag University
  • Study Director: Marco Vivarelli, Professor, Università Politecnica delle Marche

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-operative Complications

Clinical Trials on steatosis

Subscribe