Efficacy and Safety of Blue Light (453 nm) Treatment for Mild Psoriasis Vulgaris Over Three Months Compared to Vitamin D.

January 7, 2019 updated by: Philips Electronics Nederland BV

Monocenter, Randomized, Blinded, Intraindividual Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Blue Light (453 nm) Treatment for Mild Psoriasis Vulgaris Over Three Months Compared to Vitamin D

Patients will be screened up to 28 days before start of treatment. During the screening visit, the purpose and procedures of the study will be explained to potential patients and informed consent will be obtained.

At the baseline visit, all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be re-assessed. Eligible patients will be randomized to treatment of the target area with either 30 minutes (group30) or 15 minutes (group15) blue light at 600 milliwatt per square centimeter (mW/cm²). Additionally, two study areas with similar clinical symptomatology will be determined and will be randomized to blue light treated area and Daivonex (Vitamin D) treated area.

After randomization, patients will be trained on a demonstrator device (no actual treatment to ensure investigator is blinded as to which group the patient is randomized to) as well as the Daivonex cream. After patients have been instructed, treatment of the areas will be applied daily (once per day, 5-7 times / week) at home for a treatment period of 12 weeks. During those 12 weeks, patients will return to the study site for safety and effectiveness assessments at week 2, 4, 8 and week 12. A phone call visit will be performed after one week of treatment to check for any adverse events or problems in handling the device or the cream. The visit at week 12 serves as end of treatment visit. The patients will be followed-up for another 4 weeks. Treatment responses will be photo documented.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical faculty of the RWTH Aachen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 74 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed and dated informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure
  2. Good health as determined by the Investigator
  3. Willing and able to comply with study requirements
  4. Skin type I-IV according to Fitzpatrick
  5. Mild plaque-type psoriasis vulgaris with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 10 and body surface area (BSA) ≤ 10 at screening.
  6. Presence of two comparable psoriatic plaques suitable to be defined as study areas as follows:

    • located on extremities (plaques located on the palms or sole of the feet are not suitable)
    • Both areas located either on lower or upper extremity
    • Can be located on the same extremity
    • Distance between the two study areas ≥ 11cm (border to border)
    • If lesion is too large to be fully covered, partial treatment possible
  7. Otherwise healthy according to physical examination
  8. Aged 18 years up to ≤74 years
  9. Reliable method of contraception for women of childbearing potential (i.e. low failure rate less than 1per cent per year; e.g. oral contraceptives, intra-uterine device (IUD) or transdermal contraceptive patch)
  10. Willing to abstain from excessive sun / UV exposure (e.g. sunbath, solarium) during the course of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

General

  1. Inmates of psychiatric wards, prisons, or other state institutions
  2. Investigator or any other team member involved directly or indirectly in the conduct of the clinical study
  3. Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days
  4. Pregnant or lactating women Medical History
  5. Photodermatosis and/or Photosensitivity
  6. Porphyria and/or hypersensitivity to porphyrins
  7. Patients with current diagnosis of erythrodermic, exfoliative or pustular psoriasis
  8. Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency
  9. Patients with any of the following conditions present on the study areas: naevi or signs of hyperpigmentation, viral (e.g. herpes or varicella) lesions of the skin, fungal and bacterial skin infections, parasitic infections and atrophic skin
  10. Patients with any of the following conditions present or who have been diagnosed in the past with any of the following conditions on the study areas: skin cancer, severe actinic damage and other precancerous lesions
  11. Patients with genetic deficiencies attached with increased sensitivity to light or increased risk to dermatologic cancer ( i.e. Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne Syndrome, Bloom-Syndrome) Concomitant medication/treatment in medical history and during the study Required

    • Treatment of target and control area with Excipial U10 Lipolotio (Galderma)
    • Treatment of control area with Daivonex (Leo Pharma) Allowed
    • Topical treatment of non-study areas with Vitamin D or WHO group I-II corticosteroids or mometasone Not allowed Within 3 months prior to baseline
    • ustekinumab Within 2 months prior to baseline
    • adalimumab, alefacept, infliximab Within 1 month prior to baseline
    • Etanercept
    • Systemic corticosteroids
    • Retinoids
    • Immunosuppressants (e.g. methotrexate, ciclosporin, azathioprine, chemotherapeutics)
    • oral psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA)
    • Topical or intranasal/inhalation therapy with potent or very potent (WHO group III-IV) corticosteroids

Within 2 weeks prior to baseline

  • ultraviolet B light (UVB) / ultraviolet A light (UVA)
  • Topical therapy with
  • WHO group I-II corticosteroids
  • Topical retinoids
  • Vitamin D analogues
  • Topical immunomodulators (e.g. calcineurin inhibitors)
  • Anthracen derivatives
  • Tar
  • Salicylic acid
  • Intranasal/inhalation therapy with WHO group I-II corticosteroids At baseline

    • Photo-sensitizing medication (e.g. psoralen, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, furosemide, amiodarone, phenotiacine, chinclone, fibrates, hypericumperforatum, arnica, valerian, tar, psoralen, ketoprofen) or colours (e.g. thiazide, toluidine blue, eosin, methylene blue, rose Bengal, acridine)
    • Initiation of, or expected changes in concomitant medication that may affect psoriasis vulgaris (e.g., beta blockers, anti-malaria drugs, lithium and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group30
Treatment of the target area with 30 minutes of blue light at 453nm compared to Vitamin D creme Daivonex on contralateral Plaque of same patient.
Phototherapy of localized psoriasis vulgaris plaque with a wearable device emitting blue light at 453nm.
Treatment of contralateral localized psoriasis vulgaris plaque with Vitamin D creme (Daivonex)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group15
Treatment of the target area with 15 minutes of blue light at 453nm compared to Vitamin D creme Daivonex on contralateral Plaque of same patient.
Phototherapy of localized psoriasis vulgaris plaque with a wearable device emitting blue light at 453nm.
Treatment of contralateral localized psoriasis vulgaris plaque with Vitamin D creme (Daivonex)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Visit 2) of the Local PSI of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 30) as Compared to the VitaminD Treated Area (Control) at End of Treatment (Week 12).
Time Frame: week 12
The local Psoriasis severity index (LPSI) was adapted from the well known PASI. The investigator evaluated and graded the severity of erythema, induration, and scaliness as the key symptoms of psoriasis on the study areas (0-4). A total severity score was calculated as the sum of the three symptom ratings (range 0-12). The measure reported is the change in LPSI at end of treatment versus baseline. A negative change indicates an improvement of the LPSI.
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Visit 2) of the Local PSI of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 15) as Compared to the VitaminD Treated (Control) Area at End of Treatment (Week 12).
Time Frame: week 12
The local Psoriasis severity index (LPSI) was adapted from the well known PASI. The investigator evaluated and graded the severity of erythema, induration, and scaliness as the key symptoms of psoriasis on the study areas (0-4 each). A total severity score was calculated as the sum of the three symptom ratings (range 0-12). The measure reported is the change in LPSI at end of treatment versus baseline. A negative change indicates an improvement of the LPSI.
week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient Self-assessment of Severity of Psoriasis of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 30) Compared to the VitaminD Treated (Control) Area at Week 12 (VAS Scale).
Time Frame: week 12
Patient Rating of severity of Psoriasis Plaques on a 0-10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale. VAS = 0 cm corresponds to no pain,, VAS = 10 cm corresponds to maximal imaginable pain.
week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient Self-assessment of Severity of Psoriasis of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 15) Compared to the VitaminD Treated (Control) Area at Week 12 (VAS Scale).
Time Frame: week 12
Patient Rating of severity of Psoriasis Plaques on 0-10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale. VAS = 0 corresponds to no symptoms of Psoriasis, VAS = 10 corresponds to most severe symptoms of Psoriasis.
week 12
Lesional Erythema Measured by Mexameter Measured at End of Treatment.
Time Frame: week 12
Lesional erythema was measured objectively with a measurement device (Mexameter). The Mexameter delivers a two digit number for the redness of the skin (range 0-99). 0 = no redness and 99 = maximal redness.
week 12
Patient Satisfaction (Week 12)
Time Frame: week 12
Patient satisfaction will be measured by questionnaire using the System usability score (SUS). The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. The higher the score the better the patient satisfaction the better the outcome. The lower the score the worse the patient satisfaction the worse the outcome.
week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hyperpigmentation of Treated Skin Areas Exposed to Blue Light and Control Area Exposed to Daivonex- Evaluation by Mexameter
Time Frame: week 2-16
Lesional tanning was measured objectively with a measurement device (Mexameter). The Mexameter delivers a two digit number for the brownish color of the skin (range 0-99). 0 = no tanning and 99 = maximal tanning.
week 2-16
Adverse Events (Serious and Non-serious)
Time Frame: week 0-16
Adverse Events (serious and non-serious) collected during the study conduct.
week 0-16
Adverse Device Effects
Time Frame: week 0-16
Adverse device effects collected during the study conduct.
week 0-16
Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: week 0-12
The number of device deficiencies was collected throughout the study
week 0-12
Thermal Comfort
Time Frame: week 12
Thermal comfort will be measured by questionaire: How comfortable was this temperature on your skin?
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Verena von Felbert, PD Dr., Universityclinic of the RWTH Aachen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Blue light treatment

3
Subscribe