Supporting Patient Care With Electronic Resources in the United States (SuPER-US)

May 31, 2016 updated by: Hyon Choi, Massachusetts General Hospital

Supporting Patient Care With Electronic Resources in the United States (SuPER-US): Effectiveness of an Online Decision Aid for Patients Considering Biologic Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis

This proof-of-concept randomized trial evaluates the effectiveness of using an online decision aid (US-ANSWER-2) in the decision-making to start or switch biologic therapy in US patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed project aims to improve the process of making evidence-informed treatment decisions by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultimately empower patient self-management. Current RA treatment emphasizes: 1) the need for early and aggressive treatment, and 2) the use of a treat-to-target approach. However, patients often struggle with treatment decisions, especially when the options have both benefits and risks. To address this challenge, investigators based at Arthritis Research Canada have previously developed an online decision aid called ANSWER-2 (ANimated, Self-serve, WEb-based, Research Tool: Version 2) for RA patients who are considering a biologic, and this tool has been recently adapted for the US healthcare setting (called US-ANSWER-2).

Objectives: 1) To evaluate the effectiveness of US-ANSWER-2 in reducing patients' decisional conflict. 2) To assess the extent to which US-ANSWER-2 improves patients' knowledge about RA medications and confidence in managing their health. 3) To examine the experiences of patients and rheumatologists in using US-ANSWER-2.

The investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial with 80 patients with RA. Eligible individuals are those: 1) with a diagnosis of RA from a rheumatologist, 2) whose rheumatologists have recommended initiating a biologic or switching to another biologic, and 3) who have internet access and email. The Intervention Group will receive simple instructions to access the US-ANSWER-2 decision aid and complete the program on their own within two days. At the end of the session, a one-page summary will be produced to help them discuss their questions, concerns, and preferred choices with their health care providers. The Control Group will receive a standard online medication guide, reflective of usual practice. Participants will complete the Decisional Conflict Scale (primary outcome) before and after the intervention (US-ANSWER-2 or standard online medication guide). The following secondary outcome measures will be collected at baseline, Month 1, and Month 2: 1) Medication Education Impact Questionnaire, and 2) Partners in Health Scale. In addition, the use of healthcare resources will be collected at baseline and Month 2, and the use of biologics will be collected at Month 6. All participants and their rheumatologists will be invited to participate in a qualitative interview about their experience with the patient decision aid.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hyon K Choi, MD, DrPH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The inclusion criteria are as follows:

    1. with a diagnosis of RA from a rheumatologist
    2. whose rheumatologists have recommended initiating a biologic or switching to another biologic
    3. who have internet access and email.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: US-ANSWER-2 decision aid
The intervention group will receive simple instructions to access the US-ANSWER-2 decision aid and complete the program on their own computers within two days. At the end of the session, US-ANSWER-2 will produce a one-page summary with the participant's questions, concerns, and preferred medication option.
US-ANSWER-2 will consist of: 1) an Information Module that presents effectiveness and side effects of each treatment option, and 2) an interactive Value Clarification Module that guides patients to consider what matter to them the most, and the pros and cons of each treatment option. Within the Information Module, the decision support information (i.e., the benefits and harms of treatment options) will be presented in narrated text, graphics, and a series of animated patient stories demonstrating attributes required for effective communication with doctors and significant others.
Active Comparator: Control group (Online medication guide)
The control group will receive the online medication guide, reflective of usual practice. The online medication guide contains standard information about biologics, including an introduction about biologic options, dosages, and effects.
Standard online medication guide.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Time Frame: Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 intervention at Month 1)
The Decisional Conflict Scale (short version) measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, factors contributing to uncertainty, and effective decision-making. It is one-dimensional and has 10 questions and three response categories (yes/no/unsure) used to compute one score.
Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 intervention at Month 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication Education Impact Questionnaire (MeiQ)
Time Frame: Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 intervention at Month 1 and at Month 2
The MeiQ consists of 6 subscales and a total of 29 items. MeiQ was developed and tested in three different samples of patients with rheumatic conditions on their knowledge of medications.
Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 intervention at Month 1 and at Month 2
Partners in Health Scale (PHS)
Time Frame: Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 intervention at Month 1 and at Month 2
The Partners in Health Scale is an 11-item measure designed to assess self-efficacy, knowledge of RA and treatment, and self-management behaviours such as taking medication appropriately and adopting a healthy lifestyle.
Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 intervention at Month 1 and at Month 2
Health Resource Utilization (HRU) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 at Month 2)
The HRU questionnaire was developed for both self and interviewer administration in people with arthritis and other chronic conditions. It consists of a series of open-ended questions about individuals' visits to health professionals, use of investigative tests, hospital visits, use of medications, purchases of adaptive aids, and estimable productivity loss incurred by the individual and their caregivers due to his/her health.
Change measure (baseline score compared to after using the US-ANSWER-2 at Month 2)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of biologics
Time Frame: 6 months from baseline
Patients will be asked whether they started or switched a biologic, and the name, since using the US-ANSWER-2.
6 months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hyon K Choi, MD, DrPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on US-ANSWER-2 decision aid

3
Subscribe