Radiation Exposure of ERCP Personnel at Different Standing Locations and Different Patient Positions.

April 25, 2017 updated by: Chulalongkorn University

Radiation Exposure of ERCP Personnel at Different Standing Locations and Different Patient Positions (Prone and Left Lateral Decubitus)

X-ray beam produced during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) affect not only the patient, but the personnel of ERCP team may have the effect from the scattered ray. According to the automatic beam adjustment function, the thicker object (eg. lying left lateral) might produce higher scatter ray than thinner object (eg. lying prone). The investigators evaluate the radiation exposure among ERCP personnel compare between patient's 2 different positions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Personal solid-state dosimeters were used to measure the radiation dose on personnel during ERCP procedure. The real-time effective doses were displayed at a monitoring screen. A dosimeter was attached outside thyroid collar of each ERCP team member included of 1st endoscopist, 2nd endoscopist, and nurse anesthetist.

Patients' age, gender, BMI, body thickness, and indications for ERCP were recorded. The patients were randomized into 2 groups by block-of-four. The patients' position was assigned to prone or left lateral decubitus. Each ERCP personnel wore a lead apron and the dosimeter was attached outside the thyroid collar. The ERCP procedure was performed according to the indication in a standard technique. After ERCP procedure, the total fluoroscopic time (minute), fluoroscopy tube voltage (kV), fluoroscopy tube current (mA), patient entrance skin dose (mGy) and personnel effective dose (Sv) from each dosimeter were recorded.

Continuous variables were compared by Student's t-test or Man Whitney U-test, where appropriate. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square or the Fisher exact test. Statistical analysis was calculated by using SPSS statistical software (version17 for Window, Chicago, USA) and two sided p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistical significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indicated for ERCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class III - IV
  • unstable vital signs
  • patients' position needed to be changed during the procedure
  • patients who need fixed position for ERCP (such as biliary hilar lesion)
  • enteroscope-assisted ERCP
  • the consent form can not be obtained

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Left lateral decubitus
In this group, the position will be assigned to Left lateral decubitus during ERCP. The radiation from fluoroscopy will be adjusted by automatic beam adjustment function to obtain the image quality.
The fluoroscopy system has an automatic beam adjustment function to maintain a good quality of image output.
Experimental: Prone
In this group, the position will be assigned to Prone during ERCP. The radiation from fluoroscopy will be adjusted by automatic beam adjustment function to obtain the image quality.
The fluoroscopy system has an automatic beam adjustment function to maintain a good quality of image output.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective Radiation Dose
Time Frame: Immediate after procedure
The effective radiation which represents equivalent dose to eye lens of each personnel were compared between 2 groups.
Immediate after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rungsun Rerknimitr, MD, FRCP, Chulalongkorn University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PA-E-RAD002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe