OHI--Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate Efficacy, Acceptability, and Perception of Benefit of an Innovative Custom AFO

February 26, 2020 updated by: Bijan Najafi, PhD

The investigators propose a randomized control trial to evaluate long term effects and effectiveness of Moore Balance Brace (MBB) ankle foot orthoses (AFO) in reducing risk of falling in older adults.

Primary Endpoints • Characterize the impact of MBB AFO on balance, gait, risk of falling, frailty status, and adverse events

Secondary Endpoints • Characterize the Impact of MBB AFO on spontaneous daily physical activities • Characterize the feasibility of the MBB AFO device on patient adherence, acceptability, user-friendliness, and perception of benefit for daily usage

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 65 or older
  • High concerns or high risk of fall
  • Ambulatory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active wound infection on either of the foot and ankle
  • Use of medication or a medical condition that may have unstable (fluctuate over time) or temporary (less than one month) impact on gait and balance
  • Acute fractures on the foot
  • Participant of an interventional study within the last 30 days
  • Non-ambulatory or unable to stand without help or walk a distance of at least 1.8 m (~six feet) without assistance
  • Major foot amputation
  • Unable or unwilling to participate in all procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MBB AFO Group
This group will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes plus a custom made MBB AFO for the duration of the study.
Subjects will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes plus a custom made MBB AFO
Active Comparator: No MBB AFO Group
This group will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes for the duration of the study.
Subjects will be provided with a pair of New Balance 813 shoes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
Hip sway (motion of hip joints in three dimensions) measured by wearable sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
baseline to 6 months
Ankle Sway Change From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
Ankle sway (motion of ankle joint in three dimensions) measured by wearable inertial sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
baseline to 6 months
Center of Mass (COM) Sway Change Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
Center of Mass (COM) sway measured by wearable inertial sensors while wearing their own shoes compared to the orthopedic shoes and compared to orthopedic shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence (Hours Per Day to Wear Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO))
Time Frame: 6 months
The adherence of participants to the prescribed Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) plus walking shoes was quantified using the response to a self-reported question ("How many hours per day did you wear the prescribed footwear?").
6 months
Fall Incidents
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Fall incidents during the study
Baseline, 12 months
Concern for Falling Change Form Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Concern for falling is quantified by Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I) questionnaire. Scores range from minimum 16 (no concern about falling) to maximum 64 (severe concern about falling). Higher score indicate worse performance.
Baseline, 6 months
Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
Physical activity level for 24 hours while wearing their own shoes compared to the walking shoes and compared to walking shoes plus Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO). To quantify physical activity, number of taken steps per day was monitored using a pendant wearable sensor called, PAMSys (Biosensics, MA, USA).
baseline to 6 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, month 12 reported
Number of participants with adverse events reported during the study. Adverse events was inquired at 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after the baseline, and summed at 12 months. If the participant has at least one adverse event reported in any assessed time frame, the participant will be categorized as the participant with adverse event.
assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, month 12 reported
Percentage of Participants Who Found the Device Useful and Easy to Use
Time Frame: 6 months
The participants perceived usefulness of ease of use of wearing Moore Balance Brace (MBB) Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) based on questionnaires of A technology acceptance model (TAM). Perceived usefulness was assessed using two questions (i.e., "I feel more stable when standing," and "I feel more stable when walking"). Perceived ease of use was assessed using two questions (i.e., "Was easy to take on and off," and "Was comfortable to wear"). The Likert scale (6-point scale from 0-5) was used to quantify how much they disagreed with each statement, including "strongly disagree," "disagree," "somewhat disagree," "somewhat agree," "agree," and "strongly agree," respectively. In this paper, responses were only categorized as positive (3-5 points) or negative (0-2 points) attitudes towards the use of AFO plus walking shoes.
6 months
Stride Velocity
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months
stride velocity measured in single-task walking with normal speed
baseline, 6 months
Stride Time
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months
stride time measured in single task walking with normal speed
baseline, 6 months
Stride Length
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months
stride length measured in single-task walking with normal speed
baseline, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Only de-identified data and associated results will be published in peer-reviewed papers or scientific abstracts

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe