PET-CT vs DWI-MRI in Response Evaluation in Esophageal Cancer (PET/MRI-EC)

February 26, 2024 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

PET-CT and DWI-MRI in Evaluating and Predicting Response to Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients

In patients with esophageal cancer (EC) neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery with curative intent leads to objective responses in 45 to 60%, whereas 20-35% of the patients had no residual tumor (ypT0N0) at pathologic examination. The absolute survival benefit of response to nCRT is 15%, but still 14% of the patients develop locoregional failure in the CROSS trial. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((FDG-PET-CT) is able to distinct responders from non-responders, but still misses significant clinical evidence. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown potential benefits, which might be enhanced by combining both methods. PET/CT and DWI-MRI more precisely correlate anatomic and metabolic FDG-avid lesions and seem to assess post-treatment changes, especially regarding nodal staging. Both techniques claim an important role in selection of patients with clinical complete response (cCR) and indirectly with pathologic complete response (pCR) after nCRT. However, the exact role and complementary effects of both techniques is still unknown.

For appropriate judgment of response, secure standard endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) / biopsy of potential suspected lesions, both nodal or residual tumor, seen on PET/CT or DWI/MRI or during EUS will be performed <2 weeks before surgery, approximately 6-10 weeks after nCRT and compared with the situation at primary staging. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) resembling pathologic response (pCR= ypT0N0) after nCRT may refrain from surgical resection and related morbidity and mortality. However, patients without early (2wk after commencement) response during nCRT course may not benefit from nCRT.

DWI-MRI seems effective in pre-treatment prediction of treatment outcome. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which indirectly measures tissue density, can be used to determine the likelihood of tumor response to treatment. High ADC before treatment has shown to predict an unfavorable response. Tumors with low ADC values on presentation generally respond better to treatment. An increased ADC in patients during and after nCRT could be used to predict early pathologic response i.e. discrimination of "responders and non-responders" to nCRT.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

DWI-MRI seems effective in pre-treatment prediction of treatment outcome. Tumor hypoxia mediates chemoradiation resistance, leading to selection of aggressive tumor cell clones with the capacity to evade tumor microenvironment by increased anaerobic glycolysis and angiogenesis. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which indirectly measures tissue density, can be used to determine the likelihood of tumor response to treatment. High ADC before treatment has shown to predict an unfavorable response. Tumors with low ADC values on presentation generally respond better to treatment. An increased ADC in patients during and after nCRT could be used to predict early pathologic response i.e. discrimination of "responders and non-responders" to nCRT.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700RB
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study group consists of patients with potentially curative (R0) resectable EC (T2-T4aN0M0/T1-T4aN1-3M0). These patients should be eligible for neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) including; performance/WHO ≤ 2; age > 18 yrs; hematology, electrolytes, liver and renal tests within normal range; no prior radio- or chemotherapy that would influence treatment for EC; no other malignancies (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ), no active infect at the time of imaging, written informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically proven esophageal cancer (SCC and AC).
  2. Age of 18 years or older.
  3. Able to give written informed consent before registration.
  4. T2-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1-3M0 esophageal cancer.
  5. Potentially curatively (R0) resectable tumor.
  6. Tumor have sufficient FDG-baseline uptake.
  7. Able to tolerate PET-CT and DWI-MRI as required by protocol.
  8. Eligible for neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), including KPScore ≥ 70% / WHO>2; adequate renal, hepatic, hematological function.
  9. No prior chemotherapy or mediastinal radiotherapy allowed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-resectable tumors: clinical or pathologic (T4b/R1-2 resections).
  2. Proven distant metastases.
  3. Prior malignancy except in-situ cervical lesions or non-melanoma skin cancer in the past 5 years.
  4. Poorly controlled diabetes
  5. Medical comorbidity preventing from surgery/preop CRT
  6. General contraindications to MRI:

    • implanted pacemaker/serious claustrophobia
    • aneurysmal clips/metal implants in field of view

6. Major obesity (BMI > 40). 7. Active esophagitis. 8. Breast feeding/Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor response
Time Frame: Assessing clinical and pathologic response
Within 2 weeks (early response) and at 6-10 weeks (late response)
Assessing clinical and pathologic response

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Plukker, MD, PhD, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

July 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The results based on data of this study will be published in medical scientific papers. Moreover the data may be used for meta-analyses or conjoined research.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Tumor

3
Subscribe