Efficacy of Gabapentin vs. Placebo for Adjuvant Pain Control Following Acute Rib Fractures

October 24, 2018 updated by: Denver Health and Hospital Authority

A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Gabapentin vs. Placebo for Adjuvant Pain Control Following Acute Rib Fractures

A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Gabapentin vs. Placebo for Adjutant Pain Control Following Acute Rib Fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Traumatic rib fractures are a tremendous source of pain which can limit respiratory function and overall recovery. Numerous multimodal pain management strategies have been employed with varying success; however, narcotics remain the mainstay of treatment. Beyond the acute side effects of narcotics, including altered mental status, depression of respiratory drive, and constipation, there is a substantial risk of long term dependency. Recently, loco-regional blockade and non-narcotic adjuncts have received increasing support within the literature. Gabapentin has been used extensively as a non-narcotic adjunct to analgesia regimens in the acute and chronic settings, however its ability to better control pain secondary to traumatic rib fractures has never been studied .

The primary aim is to assess the efficacy of gabapentin as an analgesic after rib fractures. Secondary aims are to assess the effect on pulmonary function and other known complications following rib fractures.

The hypothesis is gabapentin will improve pain control as measured by lower pain scores and lower narcotic needs. The investigators plan to test this hypothesis by recruiting trauma patients with rib fractures, and randomly assign them to gabapentin versus a placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 1 rib fractures
  • Requiring hospital admission
  • Enrolled within 24 hours of injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Intubation
  • Age <18, age >65
  • Inability to tolerate PO medication
  • Patient refusal
  • Inability to obtain consent from patient or surrogate
  • Renal or Hepatic impairment
  • Allergy or Hypersensitivity to gabapentin or any component of the formulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: gabapentin
gabapentin 300 mg three times daily x 30 d
Gabapentin 300 mg three times daily x30 days
Other Names:
  • neurontin
No Intervention: placebo
no gabapentin administered to this arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Daily Pain Score
Time Frame: 30 days
the pain score uses the visual analog scale and ranges from 0 to 10. This is recorded by nursing at pre-specified intervals depending on level of care.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Narcotic requirements
Time Frame: 30 days
measurement of daily narcotic use as 24 hour requirements of morphine equivalents, and duration of narcotic needs.
30 days
pulmonary function
Time Frame: 30 days
assessment of the incidence of pneumonia (defined clinically by the treatment team), the incidence of hypoxemia, as well as readmission for pulmonary compromise.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fredric M Pieracci, MD, PMPH, Denver Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Clinical Trials on Gabapentin

3
Subscribe