- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02907268
Botulinum Toxin A Single Blind Split-Face Randomized Pilot Study
September 12, 2017 updated by: Sheetal Sapra, ICLS Dermatology & Plastic Surgery
A Single Blind, Split-Face, Randomized, Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Intradermal and Intramuscular Injection of Two Commercially Available Botulinum Toxin A Formulas to Reduce Signs of Facial Aging
A 16-week single-blind, split-face, randomized study.
Each patient served as their own control, receiving onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA randomized to either the left or right side of the face.
Patients received intradermal BTXA injections at week 0 and intramuscular BTXA injections at week 2. The objective is to examine the effectiveness of intradermal botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) injection in improving skin texture and midface lift while reducing pore size and sebum production, as well as investigate the differences in effectiveness between onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA using intradermal and intramuscular injection methods.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
10
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
35 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female subjects between ages of 35 to 65 years (inclusive) who exhibit static wrinkles in the following areas: glabella (forehead frowns), periorbital area (crows feet). Static wrinkles in additional areas of the face are also acceptable.
- Subject is willing to maintain the same skin care regimen throughout the study and has already maintained this skin care regime for 4 weeks prior to baseline.
- The subject is able to comply with study procedures and instructions and is committed to attend all study visits within the given timelines.
- Subject is judged to be a good candidate by study nurse upon identification of dynamic and/or static wrinkles in the areas of movement, and with a moderate amount of skin laxity.
- Subject is willing to use contraception
- A signed informed consent form by a subject able to give consent, prior to any study procedures are performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Sensitivity and/or contraindications to botulinum toxin A other ingredients contained in the botulinum toxin A products.
- Any medical condition, in the opinion of the investigator, that would interfere with safety or any study procedures (e.g. auto-immune disease, history of severe allergies, hypertrophic scars, immunotherapeutic treatment, inflammatory or infectious complaints at injection sites, unable to give consent)
- Treatment with botulinum toxin A injections in the neck or face within 1 year of baseline treatment
- Treatment with facial fillers less than 1 year prior to baseline
- Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breastfeeding or plan to get pregnant during the course of the study.
- Previous treatment with Lasers, Ultrasound Technology or Radio Frequency on the face and/or neck within 1 year prior to baseline.
- Treatment with Accutane (isotretinoin) or other oral medications for acne during 1 year prior to baseline.
- The use of anti-aging products containing retinol
- Known allergy to cow's milk protein
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment Arm A
The first treatment group received onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) on the right side of their face and abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on the left side of their face.
Baseline treatment at Week 0 included the intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA on one side of the face and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other.
Patients were treated at Week 2 with traditional intramuscular injections consisting of onabotulinumtoxinA on the same side of their face as at Week 0 and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other side.
Patients were treated based on individual need, and thus the treatment volumes were not controlled or standardized.
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Allergan) was approved by the FDA in 2002.
Intervention administered by study nurse.
Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead.
Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.
Other Names:
AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Galderma) was approved by the FDA in 2009.
Intervention administered by study nurse.
Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead.
Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment Arm B
The second treatment group received abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on the right side of their face and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) on the left side of their face.
Baseline treatment at Week 0 included the intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA on one side of the face and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other.
Patients were treated at Week 2 with traditional intramuscular injections consisting of onabotulinumtoxinA on the same side of their face as at Week 0 and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other side.
Patients were treated based on individual need, and thus the treatment volumes were not controlled or standardized.
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Allergan) was approved by the FDA in 2002.
Intervention administered by study nurse.
Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead.
Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.
Other Names:
AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Galderma) was approved by the FDA in 2009.
Intervention administered by study nurse.
Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead.
Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 2 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 2 based on pre and post treatment photographs.
Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity.
0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation >2mm deep (maximum).
A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles).
Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above.
Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region.
All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
|
Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 4 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
|
Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 4 based on pre and post treatment photographs.
Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity.
0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation >2mm deep (maximum).
A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles).
Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above.
Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region.
All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.
|
Baseline and 4 weeks
|
|
Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 16 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
|
Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 16 based on pre and post treatment photographs.
Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity.
0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation >2mm deep (maximum).
A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles).
Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above.
Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region.
All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.
|
Baseline and 16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sheetal Sapra, MD, FRCPC, ICLS Dermatology & Plastic Surgery
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 15, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
September 20, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 13, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2017
Last Verified
September 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Facies
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- abobotulinumtoxinA
Other Study ID Numbers
- ICLS-06-2013
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Photographs of individual participants are included in presentations and publications.
Consent to reproduce photographs has been obtained from all participants.
No other IPD is planned to be shared unless requested.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Facial Rhytids
-
Kiomed PharmaEurofins Dermscan PharmascanActive, not recruitingNasolabial Fold Improvement | Facial Wrinkles | Lip Enhancement | Lip Augmentation | Facial Rhytides | Cheek Augmentation | Nasolabial Folds Correction | Perioral Rhytids | Jawline Definition | Volume Loss of the Jawline | Midface Contour Deficiencies | Mid-facial Volume Deficit Related to Aging | Volume Deficiency... and other conditionsFrance, Poland
-
Semikal TechnologyActive, not recruitingPeriorbital Wrinkles | Nasolabial Fold Correction | Volume Defects in the Mid-face | Skin Rejuvenation | Marionette Lines | Facial Aging | Lip Augmentation and Correction of Perioral Rhytids | Facial Wrinkles and Rhytides ReductionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Medicis Aesthetics, Inc.Completed
-
The New York Eye & Ear InfirmaryThomas Jefferson UniversityCompletedWrinkles | RhytidsUnited States
-
The Maas ClinicUnknownPerioral RhytidsUnited States
-
Teoxane SACompleted
-
Serene Medical IncCompleted
-
L'OrealCompletedSkin Aging | Radiation Tolerance | RhytidsUnited States
-
Croma-Pharma GmbHCompletedLateral Canthal Lines | Perioral RhytidsAustria
-
Croma-Pharma GmbHRecruitingA Non-Interventional PMCF Study Evaluating Croma Revitalis for the Correction of Fine Lines (RICHER)Perioral Rhytids | Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)Austria
Clinical Trials on onabotulinumtoxinA
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar LinesUnited States
-
Association of Migraine DisordersUniversity OtolaryngologyRecruitingPain From onabotulinumtoxinA InjectionsUnited States
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompleted
-
Northwell HealthWithdrawn
-
Peking UniversityNot yet recruitingFacial Aging | Melomental Folds | Oral Commissure Ptosis
-
Henry Ford Health SystemActive, not recruitingGlabellar Frown LinesUnited States
-
Buddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalCompleted
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at Birmingham and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingOveractive Bladder | Urinary Incontinence in Old Age | Urgency Urinary IncontinenceUnited States