Surgicel Snow in Gynecological Surgery

July 12, 2021 updated by: Joann Petrini, PhD, MPH, Danbury Hospital
Surgicel Snow is an FDA approved topical hemostatic agent for use during surgical procedures. Like the other mechanical agents, Surgicel Snow forms a physical barrier that blocks blood flow while providing a large surface area for the rapid formation of a fibrin clot. As a mechanical agent derived from oxidized regenerated cellulose, Surgicel Snow shares with other mechanical hemostatic agents, the benefits of a favorable risk profile. This study would examine the efficacy of Surgicel Snow vs. direct compression in the control of capillary, venous, and small arterial hemorrhage when ligation or other conventional methods of control are impractical or ineffective in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The intraoperative inclusion bleeding characteristics are minimal and mild retroperitoneal bleeding and moderate retroperitoneal bleeding that has been adequately reduced by standard surgical methods. 60 patients will be recruited for this study, all of which will be scheduled for hysterectomy at Western Connecticut Health Network (Norwalk Hospital and Danbury Hospital) under the direction of Dr. Thomas Rutherford, Dr. John Garofalo, and Dr. Robert Samuelson. The investigators will randomize 30 patients to the treatment group and 30 patients to the control group. Participants may continue all regular medications before and during the study. The consent process will be incorporated into the last pre-operative office visit. The health risks associated with use of Surgicel Snow may be less, the same or more than direct pressure alone. Surgicel Snow is generally used for minimal to mild bleeding from specific or widespread area; however, its effectiveness compared to direct pressure is unknown for a hysterectomy surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Topical hemostatic agents have been introduced as adjunct therapies to standard surgical techniques in the management of intraoperative bleeding. They are particularly useful in widespread non-anatomic bleeding or bleeding involving sensitive tissues. Topical hemostatic agents can be classified into four broad categories based on function: mechanical agents, biologic agents, flowable sealants, and fibrin sealants. Mechanical agents derived from oxidized regenerated cellulose forms a physical barrier to block blood flow, while providing a large surface area for rapid fibrin clot formation. The benefit of this mechanical agent includes a favorable risk profile. They are inexpensive, rapidly absorbed, rarely induces a local inflammatory response or fibrosis, and no reported potential for inducing immunological response or anaphylaxis.

In current literature, oxidized regenerated cellulose has been shown to reduce the length of stay and resource utilization in cardiovascular and neurologic procedures. Although these agents are being used with increasing frequency, there is a paucity of evidence to support a similar benefit in gynecologic surgery with the exception of a small number of studies on myomectomy and ovarian surgery. Although it is known that all of the agents presently approved by the FDA are capable of shortening the bleeding time associated with surgical incisions, there are limited studies to show comparative efficacy or clinical impact with respect to estimated blood loss in the retroperitoneal space. The results of extensive bleeding in the retroperitoneal spaces include significant blood loss with dissection along the extraperitoneal fascial planes, as well as intraperitoneal collection, hematoma, and abscess. Patients with postoperative pelvic collections may present with symptoms of fever, rectal pain, or lower abdominal pain. Treatment often requires IR (interventional radiology) drainage and readmission for inpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. The initial approach to hemostasis in the pelvis depends on the nature of bleeding encountered. When bleeding is encountered during pelvic dissection, evaluation of the extent and sources of bleeding, as well as its anatomic location and proximity to vital structures are the first requirements. The process of evaluating bleeding requires inspection of the bleeding sites augmented by irrigation, suctioning, and blotting with gauze. Through this process, the rate (minimal, mild, moderate, and severe) , distribution (local vs. diffuse), anatomic site (i.e., if in close proximity to vital structures), and source of blood loss (small arterial, venous or capillary) is ascertained.

In this study, investigators would examine the efficacy of Surgicel Snow, a topical mechanical hemostatic agent, versus direct compression in the control of capillary, venous, and small arterial hemorrhage when ligation or other conventional methods of control are impractical or ineffective in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Primary Outcomes:

  • Time to hemostasis
  • Failure to achieve hemostasis

Secondary Outcomes:

  • Total intraoperative time
  • Intraoperative blood loss

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Danbury, Connecticut, United States, 06810
        • Danbury Hospital
      • Norwalk, Connecticut, United States, 06856
        • Norwalk Hospital
      • Norwalk, Connecticut, United States, 06850
        • Physicians for Women's Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Women ≥18 years of age
  2. Women scheduled for standard multiport laparoscopic, single site laparoscopic, and robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
  3. Sites of surgery include Norwalk Hospital and Danbury Hospital.
  4. Indication for surgery includes benign, complex benign, and malignant conditions.
  5. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Vaginal hysterectomy or open abdominal hysterectomy;
  2. Congenital or acquired coagulation disorder including recent (within 7 days of surgery) therapeutic anticoagulation or use agents affecting platelet function, other than low dose aspirin. (Preoperative prophylactic heparin is not an exclusion criterion.)
  3. Hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy.
  4. Ovarian cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
30 patients randomized to the control group and will receive standard of care. Control patients will be managed with direct compression with gauze pads or laparotomy pads for four minutes. If hemostasis is not achieved by compression after four minutes, the source and rate of bleeding will be reevaluated and management will be determined by the surgeon. If the surgeon uses SurgicelSnow to achieve hemostasis at some point after 4 minutes, the patient will be included in the control group, but the data will be and flagged for the analysis. If failure of hemostasis at 4 minutes with an estimated loss of ≥25 cc/min, patient will be managed as per judgment of surgeon. Persistent bleeding at the 10 minute observation point will be treated as per the surgeon's judgment.
Other: Standard of Care
Other: Treatment
30 patients randomized to the treatment group will receive Surgicel Snow. For patients with qualifying bleeding (rated on initial evaluation as at least "mild") who have been randomized to receive Surgicel Snow, a single thin layer of dry Surgicel Snow will be applied over the area of bleeding and positioned firmly in direct contact to the areas of bleeding with blunt surgical instruments. Surgicel Snow will be left in the cavity to be absorbed. Dry gauze will not be placed over the material. No adjuncts will be added to the enhance hemostasis, but patients with small arteriolar bleeding will have pressure maintained on the bleeding site for 60 seconds. Hemostatic failure at 4 minutes will be reassessed for rate of blood loss and if the rate of loss is estimated at less than 25 cc per minute, additional observations will be made at 7 and 10 minutes.
Device: Surgicel Snow

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Bleeding at Specified Time Intervals
Time Frame: 4 minutes, 7 minutes and 10 minutes
Because multiple factors other than retroperitoneal bleeding contribute to the total intraoperative bleed loss, the investigators believe that the intraoperative estimated blood loss is not a pure indicator of the efficacy of a topical hemostatic agent for control of retroperitoneal bleeding. Data from the specified time points (4 minutes, 7 minutes and 10 minutes) was combined to calculate an average bleeding event time for each subject.
4 minutes, 7 minutes and 10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Intraoperative Time
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
Total intraoperative was collected from medical record.
up to 4 hours
Rate of Intraoperative Blood Loss
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
Intraoperative blood loss data was collected from medical record.
up to 4 hours
Blood Transfusion
Time Frame: up to 4 hours
Blood transfusion details was collected from medical record.
up to 4 hours
Total Postoperative Symptomatic Fluid Collection
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Postoperative symptomatic fluid collection data collected at 2 week and 6 week time period was obtained from medical record. Data from 2 week and 6 week time points was combined to calculate the total postoperative symptomatic fluid collection for each subject.
through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Number of Participants With Postoperative Pelvic Abscess
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Postoperative pelvic abscess data was collected from medical record.
through study completion, an average of 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Danbury Hospital

Collaborators

Ethicon, Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Joann Petrini, PhD, Nuvance Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-02-37-337

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Gabon

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe