Zip-Stitch® in Minimally-Invasive Surgery (ZIMS) - Safety & Efficacy in Hysterectomy (ZIMS)

May 18, 2026 updated by: ZSX Medical LLC
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch® Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Zip stitch® System in maintaining vaginal cuff closure following minimally-invasive hysterectomy. Participating subjects will be randomized and evaluated for implant passing, successful cuff closure, healing, adverse events, dyspareunia, and pain. Blinded follow-up will involve in-person visits at one week and six weeks. There will be additional unblinded follow-up in person at six months post-operatively and by telephone at 12 months post operatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Unified Women's Clinical Research
    • Pennsylvania
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
        • Lankenau Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23456
        • Tidewater Clinical Research
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26505
        • Mon Health Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Provision of signed and dated Informed Consent Form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, including participation in follow-up visits and telephonic follow-up 3. Female 18 years and older 5. Indicated for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (includes Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy, or robotic assisted vaginal hysterectomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
  2. History of Hepatitis C
  3. History of diabetes that, in the opinion of the investigator, may delay healing
  4. Current use of systemic corticosteroids
  5. Active infection of genitals, vagina, cervix, uterus or urinary tract
  6. Active bacteremia, sepsis or other active systemic infection
  7. Presence of Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)
  8. Evidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  9. Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders
  10. Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL
  11. Metastatic disease
  12. On anticoagulant therapy
  13. Participation in another interventional trial
  14. Pregnancy
  15. Abnormal Papanicolaou test (PAP) results that have not been fully evaluated, or in the opinion of the investigator may indicate abnormal vaginal cuff healing
  16. Co-morbidities that, in the opinion of the investigator, may indicate risk of abnormal vaginal cuff healing
  17. Intra-operative: Bowel injury during laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure prior to attempted cuff closure
  18. Intra-operative: Bladder injury during laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure prior to attempted cuff closure
  19. Intra-operative: Cases in which surgeon cannot identify adequate tissue along the cuff to apply suture laparoscopically
  20. Intra-operative: Cases requiring conversion to laparotomy prior to study intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips
Zip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Zip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Other: Reference Group
Will not be comparative against the test article, but will be performed for reference and safety.
Standard suture for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Other Names:
  • V-Loc or VICRYL sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Rate
Time Frame: This will be evaluated through six-weeks post-operative.
Safety: The primary safety endpoint in this study is frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence. Vaginal cuff dehiscence is defined as rupture of the surgical wound requiring surgical re-intervention.
This will be evaluated through six-weeks post-operative.
Number of Participants With Implant Passing Through Six Weeks
Time Frame: This will be evaluated through six weeks post operative.
Efficacy: The primary efficacy endpoint for this study is frequency of implant passing following cuff closure. This endpoint is based upon the rate of spontaneous implant passing events. A single event may be pieces of one or more clips or sutures being spontaneously passed by the patient (i.e., not removed by medical staff). For the primary endpoint, only passing of clips will be counted, but for secondary endpoint, clips or sutures will be counted. When implant passing was reported, subjects were asked to collect and provide passed implants, and an in-person evaluation was performed. This involved a visual cuff closure and healing assessment.
This will be evaluated through six weeks post operative.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Number of Participants With Implant Passing - Test to Reference
Time Frame: Evaluated at six weeks and six months post-operative
Percentage of subjects experiencing implant passing will be compared between test and reference groups.
Evaluated at six weeks and six months post-operative
Percentage of Participants With Implant Passing Events Determined to Impact Patient Safety
Time Frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Each reported implant passing event will be evaluated for association with adverse events. Compared as a percentage of patients in the test vs. reference groups.
Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Comparison of Incidence of Adverse Events - Test to Reference
Time Frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Adverse events and serious adverse events will be tabulated for both the test and reference groups.
Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Number of Participants With Successful Vaginal Cuff Closure
Time Frame: Performed intra-operatively and at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Cuff closure was assessed by a qualified independent blinded evaluator at zero, one, and six weeks, as well as at six months, according to a standardized protocol. Surgeon visual assessment graded vaginal cuffs as closed (Y) or not closed (N).
Performed intra-operatively and at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Number of Participants With Healed Vaginal Cuffs
Time Frame: Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Vaginal cuff healing was visually assessed by a blinded evaluator at one week, six weeks, and six months. Evaluator visual assessment graded vaginal cuffs as healed (Y) or not healed (N), or the evaluator indicated that it was not possible to determine.
Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Comparison of Change in Dyspareunia
Time Frame: Evaluated through twelve-month follow-up
Dyspareunia will be pre-operatively baselined and assessed at each follow-up timepoint, including any unexpected visits, using the sexual pain and discomfort domain (four questions) from the validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Individual success is defined as non-increase in dyspareunia from baseline to six months. Data analyzed "as treated".
Evaluated through twelve-month follow-up
Comparison of Change in Pain
Time Frame: Six-months post-operative and again at 12 months post-operative
Patient pain will be pre-operatively baselined and assessed at each follow-up timepoint, including any unexpected visits, using a validated 11-point numerical rating scale (no pain: 0 - the most pain: 10). Individual success is defined as non-increase in pain between baseline and six months. Fisher's Exact Test will be used to compare this measure between Test and Reference groups.
Six-months post-operative and again at 12 months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Gilman, MD, Main Line Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QD-PRO-054 Rev006
  • R44HD104539 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on Zip-stitch(R)

3
Subscribe