Zip-Stitch® in Minimally-Invasive Surgery (ZIMS) - Safety & Efficacy in Hysterectomy (ZIMS)

March 13, 2024 updated by: ZSX Medical LLC
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch® Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Zip stitch® System in maintaining vaginal cuff closure following minimally-invasive hysterectomy. Participating subjects will be randomized and evaluated for implant passing, successful cuff closure, healing, adverse events, dyspareunia, and pain. Blinded follow-up will involve in-person visits at one week and six weeks. There will be additional unblinded follow-up in person at six months post-operatively and by telephone at 12 months post operatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emily Hinchcliff, MD, MPH
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Recruiting
        • Unified Women's Clinical Research
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lamar Parker, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
        • Recruiting
        • Lankenau Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23456
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Tidewater Clinical Research
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26505

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Provision of signed and dated Informed Consent Form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, including participation in follow-up visits and telephonic follow-up 3. Female 18 years and older 5. Indicated for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (includes Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy, or robotic assisted vaginal hysterectomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
  2. History of Hepatitis C
  3. History of diabetes that, in the opinion of the investigator, may delay healing
  4. Current use of systemic corticosteroids
  5. Active infection of genitals, vagina, cervix, uterus or urinary tract
  6. Active bacteremia, sepsis or other active systemic infection
  7. Presence of Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)
  8. Evidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  9. Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders
  10. Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL
  11. Metastatic disease
  12. On anticoagulant therapy
  13. Participation in another interventional trial
  14. Pregnancy
  15. Abnormal Papanicolaou test (PAP) results that have not been fully evaluated, or in the opinion of the investigator may indicate abnormal vaginal cuff healing
  16. Co-morbidities that, in the opinion of the investigator, may indicate risk of abnormal vaginal cuff healing
  17. Intra-operative: Bowel injury during laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure prior to attempted cuff closure
  18. Intra-operative: Bladder injury during laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure prior to attempted cuff closure
  19. Intra-operative: Cases in which surgeon cannot identify adequate tissue along the cuff to apply suture laparoscopically
  20. Intra-operative: Cases requiring conversion to laparotomy prior to study intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips
Zip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Zip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Other: Reference Group
Will not be comparative against the test article, but will be performed for reference and safety.
Standard suture for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Other Names:
  • V-Loc or VICRYL sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety: The primary safety endpoint in this study is frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence.
Time Frame: This will be evaluated through six-weeks post-operative.
Frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence
This will be evaluated through six-weeks post-operative.
Efficacy: The primary efficacy endpoint for this study is frequency of implant passing following cuff closure.
Time Frame: This will be evaluated through six weeks post operative.
Frequency of implant passing
This will be evaluated through six weeks post operative.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Successful Vaginal Cuff Closure
Time Frame: Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Binary, visual surgeon cuff closure evaluation.
Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery
Number of Participants With Vaginal Cuff Healing
Time Frame: Performed at six weeks, and six months after surgery
Binary, visual surgeon cuff healing evaluation.
Performed at six weeks, and six months after surgery
Comparison of Number of Participants With Implant Passing - Test to Reference
Time Frame: Evaluated at six weeks and six months post-operative
Percentage of subjects experiencing implant passing will be compared between test and reference groups.
Evaluated at six weeks and six months post-operative
Percentage of Participants With Implant Passing Events Determined to Impact Patient Safety
Time Frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Each reported implant passing event will be evaluated for association with adverse events. Compared as a percentage of patients in the test vs. reference groups.
Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Comparison of Incidence of Adverse Events - Test to Reference
Time Frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Adverse events and serious adverse events will be tabulated for both the test and reference groups.
Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Number of Participants With Non-increase in Dyspareunia at Follow-up
Time Frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Non-increase in reported individual subject dyspareunia from baseline to six month follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using the relevant sexual discomfort module of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI is a validated metric of female sexual function, where lower scores indicate poor sexual function. Non-increase in sexual discomfort will be compared between test and control groups.
Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Number of Participants With Non-increase in Pain at Follow-up
Time Frame: Evaluated through six-month follow-up
Non-increase in reported individual subject pain from baseline to six-month follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates maximum possible pain.
Evaluated through six-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Holtz, MD, Main Line Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QD-PRO-054 Rev001
  • R44HD104539 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on Zip-stitch(R)

3
Subscribe