Pilot Study of the Pragmatic Use of Mobile Phone Based Follow up of Actinic Keratoses Treated With Topical 5-fluorouracil

January 11, 2018 updated by: University of California, Davis
In this study, subjects who are attending the dermatology clinic and who have already been prescribed topical 5-fluorouracial for the treatment of actinic keratoses as part of their standard of care will be recruited. The purpose of the study is to assess patient satisfaction when engaging in follow up treatment of actinic keratosis via the HIPAA-compliant teledermatology platform called Klara. Additionally, the goal is to assess the difference in total duration of treatment between treatment and control group. A total of 50 subjects will be enrolled and will be randomly assigned into the treatment group (teledermatology group; n=25) or control group (telephone only group; n=25).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objectives

To assess patient satisfaction when engaging in follow up treatment of actinic keratoses: Follow up of subjects with actinic keratoses (AK) who have been prescribed topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy as part of their standard of care.

To assess the difference in total dose of exposure to 5-FU between treatment and control group.

Background

Teledermatology is a growing field within dermatology that has started to adapt the use of mobile phone technology (1). The growth of teledermatology has allowed greater access to care in both the inpatient and outpatient setting (1, 2), as well as in educational services (3). The aim of this study is to investigate how mobile phone photographic teledermatology can be adapted for use in the dermatology clinic to continually engage with the patient. More specifically, the researchers seek to understand how mobile phone technology can be used in the evaluation of subjects on topical 5-FU therapy for their actinic keratoses.

Diffuse actinic damage is typically treated with field therapy (4) that involves the use of topical 5-FU. Patients are advised to apply the cream twice daily for 2-4 weeks (5). However, many patients note misunderstanding with these instructions (6). Typical follow up has included telephone based grading and in person follow up (5). However, a return visit to the clinic can be both burdensome to the patient and fill up the clinic with follow up appointments instead of allowing the appointment slot to go to examination of a new patient, thereby reducing access to care for other patients. Telephone conversations are not based on a physical exam and thus do not allow for objective evaluation of the treatment area. For this reason, the researchers seek to use mobile phone photography to evaluate patients with actinic keratoses on topical 5-FU treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • UC Davis Department of Dermatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects 18 years of age or older
  • Subjects who have already been prescribed topical 5-fluorouracil for treatment of scalp, facial, arm, or hand actinic keratoses but have not initiated treatment yet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults unable to consent
  • Non English speaking or illiterate
  • Subjects with known allergy to 5-fluorouracil
  • Subjects who do not have access to a smartphone capable of engaging with the online teledermatology platform
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Feedback group (teledermatology)
subject provided feedback to continue or discontinue their cream (based on actinic keratoses grading and lesion counting)
No Intervention: Control group (phone only)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in total dose of exposure to 5-FU between teledermatology and control group (measured as days of exposure x frequency of application per day)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The total exposure to 5-FU will be calculated as total doses over 4 week period.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
4 weeks and 8 weeks
Change in clinical grading of actinic keratoses
Time Frame: baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
Change in AK lesion count
Time Frame: baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
Change in severity of symptoms
Time Frame: baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
Difference in adverse effects including erythema, pruritus, burning, soreness, and/or tenderness, crusting and/or erosions, scaling and/or flaking, and swelling
Time Frame: baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8
Difference in number of clinic visits between the 2 groups
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 955458

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratosis

Clinical Trials on teledermatology feedback

3
Subscribe