- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02947633
Sciatic Technique Comparison of Nerve Blockade for Pain Control Following Hamstring Autograft Harvest in Adolescents
Sciatic Peripheral Nerve Blockade for Pain Control Following Hamstring Autograft Harvest in Adolescents: A Comparison of Two Techniques
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
SPECIFIC AIM 1. The first aim of the study is to explore the impact of sciatic PNB technique on hamstring donor site pain control postoperatively.
H1.a. The extended duration of analgesia offered by continuous sciatic PNB decreases pain scores during the initial 72 hours following hamstring autograft harvest when compared to single-injection sciatic PNB.
H1.b. The extended duration of analgesia offered by continuous sciatic PNB decreases oral pain medication use during the initial 72 hours following hamstring autograft harvest when compared to single-injection sciatic PNB.
H1.c. The extended duration of analgesia offered by continuous sciatic PNB decreases the incidence of unplanned admission due to poor pain control during the initial 72 hours following hamstring autograft harvest when compared to single-injection sciatic PNB.
SPECIFIC AIM 2. The second aim of the study is to explore the impact of sciatic PNB technique on active knee flexion postoperatively.
H2. The extended duration of analgesia offered by continuous sciatic PNB does not delay active knee flexion during the initial 72 hours following hamstring autograft harvest when compared to single-injection sciatic PNB.
SPECIFIC AIM 3. The third aim of the study is to explore the impact of sciatic PNB technique on patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control.
H3.1. The extended duration of analgesia offered by continuous sciatic PNB improves patient satisfaction during the initial 72 hours following hamstring autograft harvest when compared to single-injection sciatic PNB.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
A subject may be INCLUDED in this study if:
- The subject is male or female;
- The subject is of any racial or ethnic group;
- The subject is age 10 years to 18 years (inclusive);
- The subject is scheduled for the following: Unilateral ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft under general anesthesia on an outpatient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
- The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II;
- The subject or legally authorized representative has consented to femoral and sciatic peripheral nerve blockade for the procedure and the consent for peripheral nerve blockade has been obtained by a clinician (MD, DO, CRNA or APN) authorized to obtain consent;
- The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
A subject will be EXCLUDED from this study if:
- Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
- The subject is ASA classification > II;
- The subject has pre-existing allergies to amide local anesthetics;
- The subject receives sedation preoperatively;
- The subject is schedule for overnight hospital admission;
- The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study, including but not limited to coagulopathy, preexisting central or peripheral nervous systems disorders, and local infection or sores at the anticipated site of needle insertion;
- Unsuccessful PNB or CPI catheter placement occurs during the study. -
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Continuous sciatic PNB
If a CPI catheter is placed, the CPI catheter will be placed under ultra-sound guidance, with the tip of the catheter being placed immediately adjacent to the sciatic nerve, after the local anesthesia has been deposited.
CPI catheters will only remain in-situ for 48 hours.
|
Continuous sciatic PNB entails placing a continuous perineural infusion (CPI) catheter so that local anesthetic may be released slowly but continuously adjacent to the sciatic nerve (perineural) for several days postoperatively. The continuous PNB has the ability to reliably provide analgesia on subsequent postoperative days. Participants my be randomized to receive an additional experimental continuous pain ball during surgery which can provide up to 48 hours of pain relief. |
|
Active Comparator: Single-injection sciatic PNB
Under ultrasound-guidance, the sciatic nerve can readily be identified in the posterior thigh.
The nerve appears hyperechoic and can be traced distally to the popliteal fossa, where it divides into the tibial and common peroneal nerves.
Local anesthesia is injected under real-time visualization following a negative aspiration.
If a single-injection block is done, local anesthesia is deposited adjacent to the sciatic nerve within the fascial plane, but not within the epineurium.
As such, single-injection sciatic PNB, which can last up to 24 hours, should provide adequate analgesia precluding the need for oral narcotic or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications following ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft.
|
Single-injection sciatic PNB is a regional anesthetic technique employed to anesthetize the sciatic nerve with a single dose of local anesthetic.
This technique offers pain control for a limited amount of time based on the volume and concentration of local anesthetic used.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Reduction
Time Frame: 72 Hours
|
Guardian collects Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score.
The range is 0 - 10. 0 being no pain, 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
|
72 Hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jamie Furstein, CRNA, AANA Foundation
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
- Bushnell BD, Sakryd G, Noonan TJ. Hamstring donor-site block: evaluation of pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jul;26(7):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 May 13.
- Agin CW, Glass PSA. Tolerance and aging: optimizing analgesia in pain management. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1731-1732. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000152203.17541.16. No abstract available.
- Beales JG, Holt PJ, Keen JH, Mellor VP. Children with juvenile chronic arthritis: their beliefs about their illness and therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983 Oct;42(5):481-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.42.5.481.
- Distad BJ, Weiss MD. Clinical and electrodiagnostic features of sciatic neuropathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013 Feb;24(1):107-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.08.023. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
- Frost S, Grossfeld S, Kirkley A, Litchfield B, Fowler P, Amendola A. The efficacy of femoral nerve block in pain reduction for outpatient hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a double-blind, prospective, randomized trial. Arthroscopy. 2000 Apr;16(3):243-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(00)90047-1.
- Gagnier JJ, Morgenstern H, Chess L. Interventions designed to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injuries in adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1952-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546512458227. Epub 2012 Sep 12. Erratum In: Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):NP14.
- Mathews L. Pain in children: neglected, unaddressed and mismanaged. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(Suppl):S70-3. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.76247.
- Mehta VM, Mandala C, Foster D, Petsche TS. Comparison of revision rates in bone-patella tendon-bone autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2010 Jan;33(1):12. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20091124-15.
- Pallis M, Svoboda SJ, Cameron KL, Owens BD. Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1242-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546512443945. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
- Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):564-74. doi: 10.1177/0363546506296042. Epub 2007 Jan 29.
- Shaw T, Williams MT, Chipchase LS. Do early quadriceps exercises affect the outcome of ACL reconstruction? A randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70048-9.
- Silvers HJ, Mandelbaum BR. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injury in the female athlete. Br J Sports Med. 2007 Aug;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i52-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.037200. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
- Tran KM, Ganley TJ, Wells L, Ganesh A, Minger KI, Cucchiaro G. Intraarticular bupivacaine-clonidine-morphine versus femoral-sciatic nerve block in pediatric patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1304-1310. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180218.54037.0B.
- Twycross A. Educating nurses about pain management: the way forward. J Clin Nurs. 2002 Nov;11(6):705-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00677.x.
- Wegener JT, van Ooij B, van Dijk CN, Hollmann MW, Preckel B, Stevens MF. Value of single-injection or continuous sciatic nerve block in addition to a continuous femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):481-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228c33a.
- Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-6533
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear
-
University GhentResearch Foundation FlandersRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | ACL | ACL Injury | ACL Tear | Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition | Arthrogenic Muscle ResponsesBelgium
-
Marshall UniversityArthrex, Inc.Active, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | ACL Injury | ACL Tear | ArthroscopyUnited States
-
Isabella JaramilloMcMaster UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) TearCanada
-
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.TerminatedACL Injury | ACL Tear | ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament DeficiencyUnited States
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheRecruitingACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament DeficiencyFrance
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingACL Injury | ACL AugmentationEgypt
-
University of LahoreCompletedLow Level Laser Therapy Versus Short Wave Diathermy in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) TearPakistan
-
University Hospital, CaenInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceUnknownACL Tear | ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament DeficiencyFrance
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThe Cleveland ClinicCompletedACL Injury | ACL Tear | ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | ACL SprainUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillWithdrawnAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction RehabilitationUnited States
Clinical Trials on Continuous sciatic PNB
-
Gulhane School of MedicineCompletedDiabetic Foot | Wound Heal | Regional Anesthesia | Catheter BlockageTurkey
-
Universidad de AntioquiaCompletedCritical Limb IschemiaColombia
-
Loma Linda UniversityCompletedBreast CancerUnited States
-
Kevin King, DOCompletedPain, Postoperative | Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)United States
-
Istinye UniversityNot yet recruitingLow Back Pain | Leg Pain and/or Back Pain
-
Bagcilar Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Yeungnam University College of MedicineUnknownPostoperative PainKorea, Republic of
-
University of California, San DiegoTerminatedFoot SurgeryUnited States
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruitingRegional Anaesthesia | Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block | Pediatric Regional AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
IntelligentUltrasound LimitedCompletedAn Evaluation of the Long-Term Impact of Assistive AI on Anaesthetists' Ultrasound Scanning for UGRAUltrasound Imaging of Anatomical StructuresUnited Kingdom