Proprioceptive Isokinetic Repositioning, Functional Testing, and a Self-reported Questionnaire Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (PRO-ACL)

July 13, 2020 updated by: Joffrey DRIGNY, University Hospital, Caen

Measurement and Relationships of Proprioceptive Isokinetic Repositioning With Muscle Strength, Functional Testing, and Self-reported Questionaires Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Study With 12-months Post Operative Follow-up.

This prospectively study aims to evaluate the evolution of knee joint proprioception on isokinetic dynamometer before and after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction and its relationships with muscle strength, self reported questionnaire and return to sport. This study will include 30 athletes with isolated ACL rupture, and treated with ACL reconstruction surgery and 15 healthy volunteers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury in athletes. It has multiple consequences on the knee: instability, pain, loss of muscle strength, proprioceptive impairments, modification of the knee kinematics and premature knee osteoarthritis. In athletes, the majority of these injuries are treated with ACL reconstruction surgery. The main objective of this treatment is the reduction of knee instability to allow return to sport, and this at the same level prior to the injury. Thus, the athlete's follow-up after the surgery is essential to guide the return to sport and to ensure that the knee sensorimotor control allows the return to sport. Currently this assessment is based primarily on functional testings and measurement of muscle strength.

The investigators propose to prospectively study the evolution of instrumentally measured knee proprioception using isokinetic dynamometer before and after ACL reconstruction as well as a study of the factors associated with its favorable evolution and its impact in the return to sport and its level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Caen, France
        • Recruiting
        • CAEN University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Isolated and primary tear of the ACL
  • Individual candidate for an ACL reconstruction surgery.
  • Acute ACL injury (<6 weeks)
  • Athletes (person who competes in one or more sports that involve physical strength, speed or endurance) whatever their level of sport practice
  • Internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior knee surgery
  • Complex ligamentous lesion (lateral ligaments, posterior cruciate ligament)
  • Surgery for meniscal lesions (patients initially included but warranting meniscal surgery during arthroscopy will be secondarily excluded from the study.)
  • Recent muscle damage
  • History of significant injury on the healthy knee
  • ACL rupture recurrence
  • Pregnant woman
  • Neurological or vestibular antecedent with sequelae
  • Individuals taking treatment altering alertness (neuroleptics, sedatives)
  • Informed consent not obtained

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ACL
Intervention Group "ACL": 30 patient, athletes, with ACL deficiency candidate to a surgical ACL reconstruction
Proprioception measurement on isokinetic dynamometer using joint position sense (JPS) and the threshold to detection of passive motion (TTDPM)
Placebo Comparator: Control
Control Group: 15 healthy volunteers, athletes.
Proprioception measurement on isokinetic dynamometer using joint position sense (JPS) and the threshold to detection of passive motion (TTDPM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline passive proprioceptive evaluation after 7 months
Time Frame: ACL group: 6 weeks after surgery and 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
Measurement of knee proprioception by the passive repositioning technique (JPS, in degrees) on isokinetic dynamometer.
ACL group: 6 weeks after surgery and 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change from Baseline active proprioceptive evaluation after 7 months
Time Frame: ACL group: 6 weeks after surgery and 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
Measurement of knee proprioception by the active repositioning technique (JPS, in degrees) on isokinetic dynamometer.
ACL group: 6 weeks after surgery and 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change from Baseline TDPM (Threshold to Detection of Passive Motion) evaluation after 7 months
Time Frame: ACL group: 6 weeks after surgery and 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
Measurement of knee proprioception by the Threshold to Detection of Passive Motion (TDPM in degrees) on isokinetic dynamometer.
ACL group: 6 weeks after surgery and 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Strength
Time Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 3 months after surgery and (2) 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
Measurement of knee extensors and flexors peak strength (in newton.meter, Nm) on isokinetic dynamometer.
ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 3 months after surgery and (2) 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year
ACL-RSI questionnaire (Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury)
Time Frame: ACL group: Four evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 2 weeks before surgery, (2) 3 months after surgery, (3) 7 months after surgery and (4) 12 months after surgery
The ACL-RSI measures the patient's understanding of his knee. It comprises 12 questions with a score of 1 to 10 for each
ACL group: Four evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 2 weeks before surgery, (2) 3 months after surgery, (3) 7 months after surgery and (4) 12 months after surgery
Functional testing
Time Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 3 months after surgery and (2) 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year

Hop test. Single hop: Patients are instructed to stand on one leg and perform 1 jump as far as possible, landing on the same leg.

The total distance is recorded (in cm) .Triple hop: Patients are instructed to stand on one leg and perform 3 hops as far as possible, landing on the same leg.

The total distance for 3 consecutive hops is recorded (in cm). Cross-over hop test : The patient hops forward 3 times while alternately crossing over a marking The patient is instructed to position themselves such that the first of the 3 hops was lateral with respect to the direction of crossover The total distance hopped forward is recorded (in cm)

ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 3 months after surgery and (2) 7 months after surgery; Healthy group: one evaluation at a single point in time through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO-ACL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ACL Tear

Clinical Trials on Proprioception measurement on isokinetic dynamometer

3
Subscribe